Elsevier

Radiotherapy and Oncology

Volume 89, Issue 3, December 2008, Pages 278-286
Radiotherapy and Oncology

PET/CT in esophageal cancer
Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: Response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET–CT: Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

We determined whether evaluation of treatment response is feasible by measuring metabolic tumor volume parameters on 18F-FDG (Fluorodeoxyglucose) PET–CT (Positron emission tomography–Computed tomography). We compared the response evaluation based on metabolic tumor volume parameters to a histopathologic and clinical response evaluation (clinical response criteria: RECIST criteria = Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, and WHO criteria = World health organization).

Patients and methods

A total of 51 study subjects with adenocarcinomas (Type I due to Siewert classification) of the esophagus underwent PET–CT scans before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Tumor volume, maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV) were assessed before and after chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) was calculated by multiplying the tumor volume by the mean SUV of the volume. Clinical response evaluation was performed with endoscopic ultrasound and CT using RECIST and WHO criteria. The reference standard for treatment response was the postsurgical histopathology.

Results

The decrease of tumor volume between the pre- and post-treatment PET–CT scans was a better predictor of histopathologic response and survival than the decrease of the SUV and of the clinical response evaluation based on RECIST and WHO criteria. The highest accuracy, however, was achieved when using the TLG for the identification of treatment responders. A decrease of the TLG by >78% between pre- and post-therapy scans predicted histopathologic response with a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 93%, respectively.

Conclusions

Tumor volume and TLG can be used to assess treatment response and survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Section snippets

Patients

Fifty-one patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagus who had undergone PET–CT scans before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included in this study. Tumor grade and tumor type of all malignant esophageal lesions were determined by histological examination. The histopathology after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was the reference standard for assessing treatment response. Histopathologic response was defined as <10% viable cells in the postsurgical tumor specimen as used in

Association between histopathologic response and metabolic tumor volume

All pre- and post-treatment tumor volumes were measurable with the above-mentioned technique of tumor delineation both on PET and on PET–CT images. Table 2 demonstrates the association between the decrease of tumor volume parameters (maximum SUV, volume, SUV of volume, and TLG) and the histopathologic response to chemoradiotherapy. The decrease was calculated as the relative difference (in %) in tumor volume parameters between the pre-treatment and the post-treatment PET–CT scans. Table 2 shows

Discussion

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer has been studied for more than 25 years, its usefulness has remained controversial [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. However, based on the recent publications of randomized controlled trials, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has become the standard choice for the treatment of locally advanced carcinomas of the esophagus [1], [2].

Unfortunately until today, no reliable methods for response prediction to chemoradiotherapy exist for esophageal

References (33)

Cited by (111)

  • Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis for Detection of Minimal Residual Disease After Chemoradiotherapy for Localized Esophageal Cancer

    2020, Gastroenterology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Given the observation that ctDNA analysis appeared to be more sensitive for prediction of future distant metastasis than local recurrence, we hypothesized that integration of ctDNA with an imaging biomarker capable of detecting residual local disease would further improve performance. Prior studies have suggested that changes in fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on PET-CT after treatment for localized ESCA are associated with response to therapy and survival.32–34 In an exploratory analysis, we identified a cutpoint for total lesion glycolysis (TLG) that optimally stratified patients who experienced recurrence from those who did not.

  • The clinical value of PERCIST to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

    2020, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The use of SUL reduces dependence on patient weight as compared to the standard body weight normalised SUV and SULpeak reduces potential inconsistencies of single pixel measurements due to noise.28 The usefulness of 18F-FDG-volumetric parameters such as MTV and TLG for predicting treatment response also have been investigated in patients with various types of cancer including oesophageal cancer.29,30 To the authors' knowledge, a few studies have evaluated pathological response to NACRT using SUV parameters, volumetric parameters or PERCIST in oesophageal cancer patients.14,31,32

  • Intratreatment Response Assessment With 18F-FDG PET: Correlation of Semiquantitative PET Features With Pathologic Response of Esophageal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

    2018, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    In our analysis, volumetric PET parameters (which extracted volume and SUV data from the entire hypermetabolic tumor) were more accurate than intensity PET parameters, which extracted data from only the most metabolically active region. Other studies, mostly using posttreatment PET scans, have similarly reported that volumetric PET parameters are better correlated to histopathologic response than are conventional SUV features such as SUV max (9, 21-23). A significant independent association with pretreatment volumetric PET parameters (MTV) and survival has also been demonstrated (24, 25).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text