Three-region MRI-based whole-body attenuation correction for automated PET reconstruction

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.11.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

In this study we proposed and developed a simple attenuation mapping approach based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the purpose of reconstructing positron emission tomography (PET) images in PET/MRI imaging devices.

Methods

After experimental development, an in vivo calibration was performed by whole-body scanning of five beagles on both a PET/CT and an MRI. The attenuation was determined by using an automated segmentation algorithm to segment regions of background, lung, soft tissue and bone, and assigning them values of 0.002, 0.030, 0.098 and 0.130 cm−1, respectively.

Results

The CT-attenuated and MRI-attenuated PET images had average standardized uptake values (SUVs) that differed by 1–6% for most regions of interest (ROIs). Also, mean relative differences (MRDs) between the images were between 5% and 9% for most regions. The only exception is bone, where the three-region MRI-attenuated PET images had an SUV 10% less on average than the CT-attenuation images, and the MRD averaged 14%. Also, additional segmentation of the bone in the four-region MRI-attenuated PET images reduced the SUV difference to 3% and the MRD to 6%.

Conclusion

Therefore, despite the improvements in the four-region segmentation, the three-region segmentation, without delineation of osseous tissues, produces high-quality images that are sufficient for most expected clinical and research purposes.

Introduction

Hybrid imaging, the combination of two distinct imaging systems, is a highly useful diagnostic tool that has been researched extensively in recent years [1], [2], [3]. Imaging systems such as positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT are widely used in both clinical and research settings due to the combined functional information concerning metabolic processes (PET, SPECT) and anatomical detail (CT). There is a lot of interest in simultaneous acquisition of high-resolution morphologic imaging with molecular imaging systems. Whereas PET/CT and SPECT/CT are acquired sequentially, the integration of PET/MRI is seen as one of the opportunities to do this in a simultaneous way [4], [5], [6]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also has several advantages over CT, including high soft tissue contrast, the ability to scan in all three dimensions, higher resolution, no ionizing radiation, and can be used with a wide variety of contrast materials. Several prototypes have been developed in research groups around the world including a 7-T MRI combined with an animal PET scanner that allows for simultaneous acquisition [7], [8], [9].

Attenuation correction is a necessary step in PET reconstruction to obtain adequate images [10]. Images without attenuation correction have poor contrast and artifacts, such as high signal in the lungs and on the surface of the body. The attenuation can be determined using a transmission scan, which uses one or more rotating radioactive sources to measure the attenuation along all the lines of response. The emergence of PET/CT hybrids has allowed the attenuation to be measured using CT, eliminating the need for an additional transmission scan [11], [12], [13], [14]. Likewise, PET/MRI systems could theoretically use the MRI scan to obtain the attenuation correction. This would eliminate the need for CT and transmission scans, which increase the radiation exposure to the patient and would require additional time and money to integrate them into the system. Therefore, the most feasible way to acquire attenuation information in PET/MRI systems is to approximate the attenuation from the MRI scan.

Acquiring attenuation information from MRI is challenging due to its measurement method. Whereas CT and transmission scans directly measure the attenuation of ionizing radiation passing through the body, MRI measures proton density and magnetic characteristics of various nuclei. One problem in particular is that proton MRI signal does not allow visualization of calcium and phosphorus, which are some of the strongest absorbers of ionizing radiation. This poses a technological problem due to the difficulty of distinguishing bone from surrounding tissues. However, some researchers have developed sequences for high bone contrast using ultrashort TE imaging, but the additional scan would be unfavorable due to the added time to the protocol [15], [16]. Zaidi et al. [17] and Hofmann et al. [18] have developed methods for segmenting the bone from surrounding tissues in the brain, but no one has yet presented a method for adequately segmenting bone from the entire body. It has also been suggested by Martinez-Möller et al. [19] that segmentation of the bone for attenuation corrections is not necessary.

This study concerns evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of estimating the attenuation based on segmentation of the acquired MRI images. This is achieved by approximating the attenuation by segmenting and categorizing tissue groups based on the pixel intensities of certain regions. The resulting PET images reconstructed using approximate MRI-based attenuation maps are compared to PET images reconstructed using CT-based attenuation maps. The goal of the study was to measure the effectiveness of a simple approximation of the attenuation on the resulting PET images.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

In vivo evaluations using an animal model were performed by deriving an approximate attenuation map from MRI as a method for reconstruction of PET. The PET was also reconstructed using attenuation maps derived from CT. The two approaches of using MRI and CT for attenuation correction were analyzed by a thorough investigation into the SUV of commonly imaged tissues.

Beagle images

Four slices of a beagle for each of four different attenuation maps are shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 4 shows a CT topogram indicating the head, neck, chest and hind slices used in Fig. 3. None refers to no attenuation, MR3R refers to a three-region segmentation, MR4R refers to a four-region segmentation and CT refers to CT attenuation. The unattenuated PET images had much lower pixel values in the neck and hind regions as well as high pixel values in the lung compared to the CT. MR3R and MR4R are

Discussion

Before CT was used for attenuation correction, germanium-68 transmission scans were the gold standard [26]. PET transmission scans do not make visually noticeable distinctions between different organ groups. The most visually apparent regions are the regions of background, lung and other tissues, and Martinez-Möller et al. [19] showed that histograms of transmission scans show only the two peaks of lung and other tissues above the background. It may be reasonable to approximate nearly all

Conclusion

A three-region segmentation of a whole-body MRI scan is a good approximation for an attenuation map for PET reconstruction, and it does not differ much from the CT-attenuated PET images. This result shows that small changes in attenuation between various tissues, such as in the heart, liver and brain, do not greatly affect the resulting reconstruction. So, it is reasonable to assign a single attenuation value to fat, muscles and even bone. However, it was shown that assigning a higher

References (34)

  • KeidarZ. et al.

    SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications

    Semin Nucl Med

    (2003)
  • KinahanP. et al.

    X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners

    Semin Nucl Med

    (2003)
  • TownsendD.W. et al.

    A combined PET/CT scanner: the path to true image fusion

    Br J Radiol

    (2002)
  • AntochG. et al.

    Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • GaaJ. et al.

    Whole-body imaging with PET/MRI

    Eur J Med Res

    (2004)
  • SeemannM.D.

    Whole-body PET/MRI: the future in oncological imaging

    Technol Cancer Res Treat

    (2005)
  • ZaidiH. et al.

    Simultaneous PET/MR will replace PET/CT as the molecular multimodality imaging platform of choice

    Med Phys

    (2007)
  • JudenhoferM.S. et al.

    Simultaneous PET-MRI: a new approach for functional and morphological imaging

    Nat Med

    (2008)
  • SchlyerD. et al.

    Preliminary studies of a simultaneous PET/MRI scanner based on the RatCAP small animal tomograph

    IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec

    (2006)
  • CatanaC. et al.

    Simultaneous acquisition of multislice PET and MR images: initial results with a MR-compatible PET scanner

    J Nucl Med

    (2006)
  • TownsendD.W.

    Physical principles and technology of clinical pet imaging

    Ann Acad Med Singapore

    (2004)
  • KinahanP.E. et al.

    Dual energy CT attenuation correction methods for quantitative assessment of response to cancer therapy with PET/CT imaging

    Technol Cancer Res Treat

    (2006)
  • KamelE. et al.

    CT vs 68Ge attenuation correction in a combined PET/CT system: evaluation of the effect of lowering the ct tube current

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2002)
  • KinahanP.E. et al.

    Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner

    Med Phys

    (1998)
  • RobsonM.D. et al.

    Clinical ultrashort echo time imaging of bone and other connective tissues

    NMR Biomed

    (2006)
  • TylerD.J. et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging with ultrashort TE (UTE) PULSE sequences: technical considerations

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2007)
  • ZaidiH. et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography

    Med Phys

    (2003)
  • Cited by (38)

    • PET/MRI in Lung Cancer

      2014, Seminars in Roentgenology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the segmentation technique, the tissue is segmented into different classes and assigned corresponding attenuation coefficients based on the MR SI.11 A 3-segment model (air, soft tissue, and lungs) is performed in the Philips system using a T1W 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence (Fig. 1),12 whereas a 4-segment model (air, soft tissue, lung, and fat) is performed in Siemens system using a 3D 2-point Dixon volumetric breath-hold sequence. Distinguishing air from bone can be performed (5 segmentation) only using an ultrashort echo time sequence, however it is used only in the head owing to the high noise, streak artifacts, and misinterpretation of tissue edges.13

    • MR-based PET attenuation correction for PET/MR imaging

      2013, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Subsequently, we discuss specific problems that occur in MRAC and highlight concerns for clinical implementation. Methods that use techniques from image processing to segment MR imaging data into different tissue classes have been proposed for brain7-12,14,16-21,29 and whole-body23-27 applications. Predefined 511-keV attenuation coefficients are assigned to each tissue class to create PET AC maps.

    • Attenuation correction for PET/MR: Problems, novel approaches and practical solutions

      2012, Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since bone cannot be robustly segmented in whole-body MR images, the method ignored the specific contribution of bone. Steinberg et al. [39] and Schulz et al. [40] proposed segmentation-based approaches using instead T1-weighted turbo spin echo sequences, also ignoring the contribution by bone and allowing a faster acquisition at the expense of not differentiating between fat (μ=0.086 cm-1) and soft tissue (μ=0.096 cm-1). It should be noted that whole-body segmentation approaches represent an approximation of the true attenuation map and the performance depends on the number of tissue classes considered [42,43].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text