Comparison of 18F-FET and 18F-FDG PET in brain tumors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2009.05.005Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) in patients with brain lesions suspicious of cerebral gliomas.

Methods

Fifty-two patients with suspicion of cerebral glioma were included in this study. From 30 to 50 min after injection of 180 MBq 18F-FET, a first PET scan (18F-FET scan) was performed. Thereafter, 240 MBq 18F-FDG was injected and a second PET scan was acquired from 30 to 60 min after the second injection (18F-FET/18F-FDG scan). The cerebral accumulation of 18F-FDG was calculated by decay corrected subtraction of the 18F-FET scan from the 18F-FET/18F-FDG scan. Tracer uptake was evaluated by visual scoring and by lesion-to-background (L/B) ratios. The imaging results were compared with the histological results and prognosis.

Results

Histology revealed 24 low-grade gliomas (LGG) of World Health Organization (WHO) Grade II and 19 high-grade gliomas (HGG) of WHO Grade III or IV, as well as nine others, mainly benign histologies. The gliomas showed increased 18F-FET uptake (>normal brain) in 86% and increased 18F-FDG uptake (>white matter) in 35%. 18F-FET PET provided diagnostically useful delineation of tumor extent while this was impractical with 18F-FDG due to high tracer uptake in the gray matter. A local maximum in the tumor area for biopsy guidance could be identified with 18F-FET in 76% and with 18F-FDG in 28%. The L/B ratios showed significant differences between LGG and HGG for both tracers but considerable overlap so that reliable preoperative grading was not possible. A significant correlation of tracer uptake with overall survival was found with 18F-FDG only. In some benign lesions like abscesses, increased uptake was observed for both tracers indicating a limited specificity of both techniques.

Conclusions

18F-FET PET is superior to 18F-FDG for biopsy guidance and treatment planning of cerebral gliomas. The uptake of 18F-FDG is associated with prognosis, but the predictive value is limited and a histological evaluation of tumor tissue remains necessary. Therefore, amino acids like 18F-FET are the preferred PET tracers for the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Introduction

Today, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the method of choice for the diagnosis of brain tumors, but positron emission tomography (PET) may provide significant additional clinical information in many circumstances [1]. The most widely used PET tracer is [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) that has been applied successfully for tumor grading of cerebral gliomas, as a prognostic parameter, to guide biopsy and to differentiate tumor recurrence from radionecrosis [2], [3], [4]. The specificity of 18F-FDG for tumor tissue, however, is limited owing to high uptake in inflammatory tissue and clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of tumor recurrence is controversial [1], [4]. Another problem for brain tumor imaging is the high uptake of 18F-FDG in the normal brain tissue, which prohibits the definition of tumor extent. In contrast to 18F-FDG, the uptake of radiolabelled amino acids in the normal brain is low and brain tumors are delineated from normal brain tissue with a high tumor-to-brain contrast. Numerous studies have demonstrated that brain tumor imaging using amino acids such as 11C-methionine (11C-MET) are especially useful to determine the extent of cerebral gliomas for treatment planning and for biopsy guidance [5]. The role of amino acid imaging for grading and prognosis of cerebral gliomas is controversial [5]. In spite of convincing clinical results, the use of 11C-MET remains restricted to a few centers with an on-site cyclotron due to the short-lived 11C (20-min half-life versus 109 min for 18F). In recent years some 18F-labelled amino acids have been developed that allow a more widespread use of amino acid imaging. One of the most promising tracers is O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) that can be produced in large amounts for clinical purposes like 18F-FDG [6], [7]. A number of studies have proven the clinical value of 18F-FET PET to determine the extent of cerebral gliomas for treatment planning and biopsy guidance, the detection of tumor recurrences and prognosis especially in low-grade gliomas (LGG) [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Some studies have compared the diagnostic potential of 18F-FDG PET in brain tumors to that of 11C-MET [2], [3], [13], [14], [15] and to that of SPECT using 123I-iodo-alpha-l-methyl-tyrosine (123I-IMT) [16], [17], [18]. A comparison of 18F-FET PET and 18F-FDG PET is not yet available. In this prospective study, we compared PET imaging with 18F-FDG and 18F-FET and clinical follow-up in patients who were admitted between 2004 and 2005 with the clinical suspicion of a brain tumor.

Section snippets

Patient population

Within a 2-year period from 2004 to 2005, a group of 59 consecutive adult patients admitted with suspicion of a cerebral glioma or a recurrence of a previously operated glioma was investigated by 18F-FET and 18F-FDG PET. The study was approved by the university ethics committee and federal authorities. All subjects gave written informed consent for their participation in the study. Seven patients with suspicion of a LGG or a benign lesion had to be excluded from further evaluation because they

Results

A total of 52 patients who had 18F-FET and 18F-FDG PET scans prior to histological diagnosis were analyzed. Forty-three patients had diffuse cerebral gliomas, of whom 33 had primary tumors and 10 recurrences. Twenty-two patients had LGG corresponding to WHO Grade II, 13 patients had anaplastic gliomas of WHO Grade III and 11 patients had glioblastomas of WHO Grade IV. One patient turned out to carry an intracerebral malignant lymphoma; one patient had a giant, invasive pituitary adenoma and

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of 18F-FET and 18F-FDG PET in patients with brain lesions suspicious of cerebral gliomas because which of the two tracers should be preferred for brain tumor imaging is still under discussion. A number of studies have already compared the potential of PET imaging with radiolabeled amino acids to that of 18F-FDG and reported concordantly that diagnostics using amino acids is more helpful for the clinical management of glioma patients

Conclusion

18F-FET PET is superior to 18F-FDG for biopsy guidance and treatment planning of cerebral gliomas. The uptake of 18F-FDG correlates with prognosis but the predictive value is limited and histological evaluation of tumor tissue remains necessary. Therefore, amino acids like 18F-FET are the preferred PET tracers for the clinical management of cerebral gliomas.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Suzanne Schaden, Elisabeth Theelen and Barbara Elghahwagi for assistance in the patient studies, and Silke Grafmüller, Erika Wabbals and Sascha Rehbein for radiosynthesis of 18F-FET. This work was supported by the Brain Imaging Center West (BICW) and a grant from the Deutsche Krebshilfe to G.R. (70-3088-Sa I). The facility for magnetic resonance imaging at the Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine-Forschungszentrum was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung

References (35)

  • PauleitD. et al.

    O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET combined with magnetic resonance imaging improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas

    Brain

    (2005)
  • PöpperlG. et al.

    Value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2004)
  • RachingerW. et al.

    Positron emission tomography with O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent gliomas

    Neurosurgery

    (2005)
  • FloethF.W. et al.

    Prognostic value of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET and MRI in low-grade glioma

    J Nucl Med

    (2007)
  • ChungJ.K. et al.

    Usefulness of 11C-methionine PET in the evaluation of brain lesions that are hypo- or isometabolic on 18F-FDG PET

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2002)
  • PirotteB. et al.

    Comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine for PET-guided stereotactic brain biopsy of gliomas

    J Nucl Med

    (2004)
  • Van LaereK. et al.

    Direct comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET in suspected recurrence of glioma: sensitivity, inter-observer variability and prognostic value

    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging

    (2005)
  • Cited by (161)

    • Positron emission tomography imaging in primary brain tumors

      2022, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Volume 1-4
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text