Elsevier

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume 15, Issue 4, July–August 2008, Pages 518-525
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Original article
Variability of myocardial ischemic responses to mental versus exercise or adenosine stress in patients with coronary artery disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.04.005Get rights and content

Background

Mental stress precipitates myocardial ischemia in a significant percentage of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. Exercise or adenosine stresses produce different physiologic responses and cause myocardial ischemia via different mechanisms. Little is known about the comparative severity and location of myocardial ischemia provoked by these different stressors. In this study we sought to compare the within-individual ischemic responses to mental versus exercise or adenosine stress in a cohort of CAD patients.

Methods and Results

All patients underwent mental stress and either exercise or adenosine testing within a 1-week period. Mental stress was induced via a public speaking task. Rest-stress myocardial perfusion imaging was used with all testing protocols. Participants were 187 patients (65 women [35%]) with a documented history of CAD and a mean age of 64 ± 9 years. Mental stress–induced myocardial ischemia (MSIMI) was less prevalent and frequently of less magnitude than exercise- or adenosine-induced ischemia. Ischemia induced by exercise or adenosine testing did not accurately predict the development or the location of MSIMI. The overall concordance between these stressors for provoking ischemia was weak (percent agreement, 71%; κ [± SE], 0.26 ± 0.07). In a minority of patients (11%) mental stress provoked ischemia in the absence of exercise- or adenosine-induced ischemia. Moreover, in patients who had myocardial ischemia during both stressors, there were significant within-individual differences in the coronary artery distribution of the ischemic regions. MSIMI was more likely to occur in a single-vessel distribution (86%) compared with exercise- or adenosine-induced ischemia (54%). The stressors had moderate agreement if the ischemic region was in the right coronary artery territory (percent agreement, 76%; κ, 0.52 ± 0.19) or the left anterior descending coronary artery (percent agreement, 76%; κ, 0.51 ± 0.19) and significantly lower agreement in the left circumflex territory (percent agreement, 62%; κ, 0.22 ± 0.18).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that mental and exercise or adenosine stresses provoke different myocardial ischemic responses. These observations suggest that exercise or adenosine testing may not adequately assess the likelihood of occurrence or severity of MSIMI and that different mechanisms are operative in each condition.

Section snippets

Study Design

The study protocol was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (Gainesville, Fla). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. In random order, all patients underwent mental stress and exercise or adenosine stress testing on separate mornings within a 1-week period. None of the participants had any changes in their medications or clinical status between the testing sessions. The tests were conducted after an overnight fast. β-Blockers, calcium channel blockers,

Patient Characteristics and Baseline Data

A total of 187 patients were studied; 65 of these (35%) were women. The mean age was 64 ± 9 years. The majority of patients (88%) were white, whereas 7% were black. All participants had CAD. Of the patients, 65% satisfied entry criteria based on abnormal coronary angiograms, 35% had a history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 19% had prior MI, and 63% had a history of anginal symptoms. Other comorbid medical conditions included diabetes (32%), hypertension (78%), hyperlipidemia (89%),

Discussion

Our findings in this study indicate that there is a significant variability in ischemic responses to mental versus exercise or adenosine stress. The overall concordance for provoking ischemia between these testing modalities was weak (percent agreement, 71%; κ, 0.26). In a minority of patients (11%) mental stress provoked ischemia in the absence of exercise- or adenosine-induced ischemia. Moreover, among the patients who had myocardial ischemia during both stressors, there were significant

Limitations

Arguably, many factors may be involved in the observed variability reported in this study. Variabilities in image acquisition techniques, image interpretation, image quality, and attenuation artifacts may all account for some of the observed differences. Differences in the potency of stressors used is another factor. There are established criteria for ensuring adequacy of exercise stress testing—that is, patients having achieved at least 85% of their age-predicted HR.13 No such criterion has

Conclusion

Our findings in this study indicate that there is marked variability in ischemic responses to exercise or adenosine versus mental stress testing. Whatever the underlying mechanisms, it will be important to determine whether mental stress testing provides additional risk prediction above and beyond the other traditional risk stratification tools in different categories of patients.

Acknowledgment

The authors have indicated they have no financial conflicts of interest.

References (32)

Cited by (20)

  • A study of myocardial perfusion in patients with panic disorder and low risk coronary artery disease after 35% CO<inf>2</inf> challenge

    2014, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is possible that the physiological stress induced by the challenge on the myocardium was not sufficient to induce ischemia in patients with normal exercise stress tests. In fact, a few recent reports have shown that only between 11 and 29% of CAD patients with normal nuclear exercise stress tests have mental stress-induced ischemia [15,33,34]. In addition, animal work suggests that normal coronary arteries tend to dilate during mental stress, whereas diseased portions of arteries constrict [35].

  • Mechanistic and Methodological Considerations for the Imaging of Mental Stress Ischemia

    2010, Clinical Nuclear Cardiology: State of the Art and Future Directions
View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported by grants HL 070265 and HL 072059 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. This material is also the result of work supported by resources and the use of facilities at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Fla.

View full text