Transgenerational carcinogenesis: induction and transmission of genetic alterations and mechanisms of carcinogenesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.06.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Parental exposure, i.e. germ cell exposure to radiation and chemicals, increased the incidence of tumors and malformations in the offspring, and the germ-line alterations that cause cancer are transmissible to further generations. However, tumor incidences were 100-fold higher than those of ordinary mouse mutations and there were apparent strain differences in the types of induced tumors. In human, higher risk of leukemia is reported in the children of fathers who had been exposed to radionuclides at the nuclear reprocessing plants or to diagnostic doses of radiation. However, these findings in mice and men have not been confirmed in the children of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Another important finding was that germ-line exposure was very weakly tumorigenic by itself. However, the transmissible alterations caused persistent hypersensitivity to tumor induction in the offspring, e.g. enhanced by postnatal treatment with tumor promoting/carcinogenic agents. The above results suggest that transmissible alterations might be imprinted in germ cells for the future development of cancer by the postnatal environment. Many gene loci concerning immunological, biochemical and physiological function might be involved, and the cumulative changes in such genes may slightly elevate or enhance tumor incidences, although mutations of tumor suppressor genes such as p53 were also detected in some offspring and genomic instability may modify tumor occurrence in transgenerational manner. In fact, Gene Chip analysis showed suppression and/or over-expression of many functional genes rather than cancer-related genes in the preconceptionally irradiated cancer prone progeny.

Introduction

Radiation and chemicals are known to produce visible and lethal mutations in germ cells of higher plants and animals. In mice, parental exposure to radiation and chemicals also induced tumors and congenital malformations [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The increase in the incidence of malformations has been confirmed by Kirk and Lyon [6] with radiation, and risk of the offspring from father’s exposure to toxic agents is suggested [7], [8]. Preconceptional exposure of females also induces such defects in the offspring [1], [2], [3], [9]. The first and large scale mouse experiments on tumor induction in the offspring after parental exposure to radiation were carried out by Nomura [2], [3]. Dose dependent increases of tumors were observed in the F1 offspring of male and female ICR mice exposed to acute doses of X-rays (0.36–5.04 Gy). Postmeiotic stages of germ cells were twice as sensitive to tumor induction as the spermatogonial stage. Oocytes were resistant to low doses (∼1 Gy) of X-rays but very sensitive to higher doses. Protracted parental irradiation (0.36 Gy at 2 h intervals) at the spermatogonia and mature oocyte stages significantly reduced the tumorigenic effects of radiation in the offspring, compared to single irradiation with the same total doses (2.16, 3.6 and 5.04 Gy) [2], [3]. However, such reduction was not observed, when postmeiotic stages were irradiated. The pattern of the radiation sensitivity of germ cell stages for tumor induction was similar to that for ordinary mouse mutations [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Furthermore, significantly high incidences of tumors were observed in the F2 generation only when F1 progeny had tumors, suggesting that germ-line alterations causing tumors transmitted to the next generation [2], [3]. However, both induced and spontaneous incidences of tumors are 100-fold higher than those of ordinary mouse mutations [3], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Doubling dose of tumor-causing alteration in spermatogonia was about 1.5 Gy for adult type tumors in the lung and ovary [5]. Postnatal treatment of irradiated offspring with tumor promoting agents, urethane, etc. enhanced tumor incidences [4], [15]. Some of the original findings by Nomura were confirmed with different strains of mice N5, LT, etc. with radiation and chemicals [1], [2], [3], [5], [16]. However, the above studies have not been supported by a large epidemiological survey in the children of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki until now.

In this review, evidences for the induction and transmission of genetic alterations and a possible mechanism for the induction of transgenerational carcinogenesis are presented.

Section snippets

Induction and transmission of genetic alterations

Transmission of genetic alterations that cause cancer is influenced and/or modified by postnatal environments. Consequently, these investigations have to be carried out carefully using well-controlled procedures such as the use of inbred animals, high quality animal facilities, and strict coding system. Fig. 1 indicates the experimental procedure of transgenerational carcinogenesis in our department. Mice were expanded from a single pair of inbred mice. Some mice were exposed to radiation and

Germ-line alteration causing tumors

If germ-line alteration can lead to cancer, all cells composing that organ must be mutated and have an equal likelihood to form tumors. However, only one tumor nodule was induced in the organ. Presumably, such changes induced in the offspring by parental exposure to X-rays must be weakly carcinogenic by itself, and their expression will be influenced by aging, naturally existing carcinogenic and promoting agents in the diet and environment. This hypothesis was proven by the fact that unusually

Transgenerational cytogenetic and molecular changes

All of the above findings suggest that radiation and chemical induced germ-line alteration is weakly carcinogenic by itself, but it is essential and transmissible to further generations, causing hypersensitivity or high susceptibility to tumor induction with tumor promoting agents. What is the germ cell alteration causing tumors in the next generation?

Of mice and men

In 1990, Gardner et al. reported that there was about 6–8-fold higher risk of leukemia in the children of fathers who were employed at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant and had been exposed to 10–100 mSv of radiation before conception [17]. As a possible cause of leukemia induction, the sperm damage by fathers’ exposure to radiation was considered from Nomura’s mouse experiments [3], [4], [5], [38]. However, it has not been supported in the children of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and

Acknowledgements

The author is very grateful to all the past and present members in the Department of Radiation Biology and Medical Genetics, Osaka University, especially H. Nakajima, H. Ryo, S. Adachi and M. Maeda for their help, and to Professor W.W. Au, University of Texas, for his advice and help in editing the manuscript.

References (45)

  • H.J. Evans

    Parental mutagenesis and familial cancer

    Nature

    (1982)
  • N.A. Brown

    Are offspring at risk from their father’s exposure to toxins?

    Nature

    (1985)
  • W.L. Russell et al.

    Dependence of mutation rate on radiation intensity

    Science

    (1958)
  • M.F. Lyon et al.

    Dose-rate and mutation frequency after irradiation of mouse spermatogonia, Nature (London)

    New Biol.

    (1972)
  • W.L. Russell et al.

    Specific-locus mutation frequencies in mouse stem-cell spermatogonia at very low radiation dose rates

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1982)
  • W.L. Russell et al.

    Mutation frequencies in male mice and the estimation of genetic hazards of radiation in men

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (1982)
  • U.H. Ehling, Methods to estimate the genetic risk, in: G. Obe (Ed.), Mutations in Man, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984,...
  • T. Nomura, Role of radiation-induced mutations in multigeneration carcinogenesis, in: N.P. Napalkov, J.M. Rice, L....
  • IARC, IARC Monograph on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, vol. 75, Physical Agents: Ionizing Radiation,...
  • M.J. Gardner et al.

    Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria

    Br. Med. J.

    (1990)
  • T. Nomura

    Transplacental and transgenerational late effects of radiation and chemicals

    Congenit. Anom.

    (2000)
  • T. Takahashi et al.

    252Cf relative biological effectiveness and inheritable effects of fission neutrons in mouse liver tumorigenesis

    Cancer Res.

    (1992)
  • Cited by (44)

    • The Pediatrician's Role in Protecting Children from Environmental Hazards

      2023, Pediatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease hypothesis has also been expanded beyond the effects of nutritional deprivation described by Barker and colleagues16–19 to recognize the broader range of subtler insults, including environmental exposures, which can also disrupt developmental programming.37 The science of epigenetics has further unraveled the multigenerational consequences of environmental hazards,38–42 and reinforced the reality that EDCs need not be structurally similar to hormones to have effects on their function.34 Beginning in 1997, the NIEHS-EPA Children’s Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research Centers (Children’s Centers) produced much of the direct evidence of harm induced by environmental exposures, and particularly EDCs.

    • Sins of fathers through a scientific lens: Transgenerational effects

      2021, Genome Stability: From Virus to Human Application
    • Sins of Fathers Through a Scientific Lens: Transgenerational Effects

      2016, Genome Stability: From Virus to Human Application
    • DNA alterations and effects on growth and reproduction in Daphnia magna during chronic exposure to gamma radiation over three successive generations

      2015, Aquatic Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fourth, the comparison of dose rates at which genotoxicity was detected between mothers and neonates (especially between generation P and F0) showed that, at the molecular level, embryos were more radiosensitive than adult females. To date, the majority of studies investigating genotoxic effects of radionuclides in a multigenerational context focused on vertebrates, including mouse and fish models (Kubota et al., 1995; Morgan, 2003; Nomura, 2003; Shimada and Shima, 2004; Barber and Dubrova, 2006; Barber et al., 2006; Tsyusko et al., 2007; Ryabokon, 2010; Grygoryev et al., 2013). In invertebrates, an accumulation of DNA alterations and transmission to their offspring were reported in two successive generations of D. magna exposed to depleted U (Plaire et al., 2013) and in the butterfly Z. maha exposed to environmental doses of gamma radiation (Hiyama et al., 2013).

    • Non-targeted effects as a paradigm breaking evidence

      2010, Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
    • The effects of in utero irradiation on mutation induction and transgenerational instability in mice

      2009, Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text