Treatment and survival of patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastasis: A retrospective cohort analysis
Introduction
Neoplastic meningitis, or leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), is the result of spread of malignant cells to the subarachnoid space within the compartment of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [1]. It occurs in many types of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LM is associated with poor prognosis and rapid deterioration of performance status [1]. Radiotherapy, surgery and intrathecal chemotherapy all have been described as treatment options for NSCLC-patients with LM. However, the efficacy of these treatments for LM-patients is unclear and there is no consensus which (combination) provides the optimal therapeutic strategy [2], [3]. Treatment should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team involved in the treatment of this complication of cancer.
It has been reported that central nervous system (CNS) metastases (including LM) are more often diagnosed in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated (EGFR+) NSCLC-patients [4]. This may be due to the prolonged survival of EGFR+ NSCLC-patients and/or the poor penetration of first generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) into the CSF [5]. Several studies have reported on LM in NSCLC-patients. However, in most studies, EGFR-mutation status was not provided or only in a small subset (N = 6–23) of patients [2], [3], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15].
Small series suggest that EGFR-TKI naïve EGFR+ patients who received EGFR-TKI treatment after diagnosis of LM may experience a better survival than patients who do not receive EGFR-TKI treatment after diagnosis of LM [3], [6], [15]. However, since LM is usually a late event, most EGFR+ NSCLC-patients have already been treated with EGFR-TKIs prior to diagnosis of LM. In addition to the previous mentioned treatment modalities for LM, high-dose EGFR-TKIs and switch of EGFR-TKI-treatment have been described as treatment option for EGFR+ NSCLC-patients with LM [7], [14], [16], [17].
Altogether, data on LM in EGFR+ NSCLC are scarce. We therefore retrospectively evaluated a multi-institutional cohort of EGFR+ NSCLC-patients for diagnosis of LM. The purpose of this study was to describe diagnosis of LM and treatment modalities and survival after diagnosis of LM, in EGFR+ NSCLC-patients.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Medical records of EGFR+ NSCLC-patients from 11 Dutch hospitals (4 academic and 7 non-academic) who were diagnosed with advanced-stage (stage IIIB or IV) NSCLC between August 2000 and June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed for diagnosis of LM. A diagnosis of LM was defined as focal or diffuse enhancement of leptomeninges, nerve roots or ependymal surface diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or a cytopathological diagnosis of malignant cells in the CSF. Detection of atypical and/or
Leptomeningeal metastases in EGFR+ NSCLC-patients
Medical records of 356 advanced-stage NSCLC-patients with an EGFR-mutation were screened for diagnosis of LM. Median follow-up of these patients was 21.0 months (range 0.2–144.9). Two patients were lost to follow-up after 24.5 and 44.5 months. LM was diagnosed in 9.0% of the patients (32 patients). Patient and tumour characteristics are provided in Table 1.
In 19 patients (59.4%) LM was diagnosed by MRI, in three patients (9.4%) by CSF cytology and in 10 patients (31.3%) by both MRI and CSF
Discussion
In this cohort of EGFR+ NSCLC-patients LM was detected in 9.0%, comparable to the previously reported rate of LM in EGFR-wild type NSCLC-patients [19]. To the best of our knowledge, this report describes the largest group of EGFR+ NSCLC-patients with LM. The median survival after diagnosis of LM was a disappointing 3.1 months, which is similar to unselected NSCLC-patients with LM [2], [3]. Interestingly, a considerable part of the patients had a longer than expected survival with 43.8% and
Conflicts of interest
A.M.C. Dingemans received consultancy fees from Roche, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Pfizer. H.J.M. Groen received fees for participation in review activities from Roche and consultancy fees from Roche, MSD, GSK, Eli Lilly and Pfizer. F.H. Krouwels received consultancy fees from Boehringer and payment for lectures from GSK, Boehringer and Novartis. A.J. van der Wekken received money through his institution for board membership from Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly and
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Lian Roebers (Rijnstate hospital) for her assistance in data collection.
There was no funding source and no writing assistance.
References (37)
- et al.
Neoplastic meningitis
Lancet Neurol
(2006) - et al.
Analysis of treatment outcomes of intraventricular chemotherapy in 105 patients for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from non-small-cell lung cancer
J Thorac Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Leptomeningeal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: survival and the impact of whole brain radiotherapy
J Thorac Oncol
(2012) - et al.
Erlotinib versus gefitinib for control of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small-cell lung cancer
J Thorac Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: impact on survival and correlated prognostic factors
J Thorac Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Clinical outcomes of leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the modern chemotherapy era
Lung Cancer
(2012) - et al.
Prolonged survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in the modern treatment era
Clin Lung Cancer
(2014) - et al.
Detection of epithelial growth factor receptor mutations in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with lung adenocarcinoma suspected of neoplastic meningitis
J Thorac Oncol
(2011) - et al.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for leptomeningeal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive EGFR mutation or other predictive factors of good response for EGFR TKI
Lung Cancer
(2009) - et al.
Clinical outcome in patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer: Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group
Lung Cancer
(2012)
Efficacy of erlotinib for brain and leptomeningeal metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma who showed initial good response to gefitinib
J Thorac Oncol
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eur J Cancer
High-dose, weekly erlotinib is not an effective treatment in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer-patients with acquired extracranial progressive disease on standard dose erlotinib
Eur J Cancer
High-dose, pulsatile erlotinib in two NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases-One with a remarkable thoracic response as well
Lung Cancer
Efficacy of the irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease
J Thorac Oncol
Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
High incidence of disease recurrence in the brain and leptomeninges in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after response to gefitinib
Cancer
Cerebrospinal fluid concentration of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
Cited by (106)
Determining plasma and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of EGFR-TKI in lung cancer patients
2023, Analytical BiochemistryOsimertinib Improves overall survival of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases
2023, Translational OncologyMolecular characteristics and prognostic factors of leptomeningeal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer
2023, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery