Clinical Investigation
Impact of [11C]Methionine Positron Emission Tomography for Target Definition of Glioblastoma Multiforme in Radiation Therapy Planning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.020Get rights and content

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to define the optimal margins for gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) and T2-weighted MRI (T2-MRI) for delineating target volumes in planning radiation therapy for postoperative patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) by comparison to carbon-11-labeled methionine positron emission tomography ([11C]MET-PET) findings.

Methods and Materials

Computed tomography (CT), MRI, and [11C]MET-PET were separately performed for radiation therapy planning for 32 patients newly diagnosed with GBM within 2 weeks after undergoing surgery. The extent of Gd-MRI (Gd-enhanced clinical target volume [CTV-Gd]) uptake and that of T2-MRI of the CTV (CTV-T2) were compared with the extent of [11C]MET-PET (CTV--[11C]MET-PET) uptake by using CT--MRI or CT--[11C]MET-PET fusion imaging. We defined CTV-Gd (x mm) and CTV-T2 (x mm) as the x-mm margins (where x = 0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mm) outside the CTV-Gd and the CTV-T2, respectively. We evaluated the relationship between CTV-Gd (x mm) and CTV-- [11C]MET-PET and the relationship between CTV-T2 (x mm) and CTV-- [11C]MET-PET.

Results

The sensitivity of CTV-Gd (20 mm) (86.4%) was significantly higher than that of the other CTV-Gd. The sensitivity of CTV-T2 (20 mm) (96.4%) was significantly higher than that of the other CTV-T2 (x = 0, 2, 5, 10 mm). The highest sensitivity and lowest specificity was found with CTV-T2 (x = 20 mm).

Conclusions

It is necessary to use a margin of at least 2 cm for CTV-T2 for the initial target planning of radiation therapy. However, there is a limit to this setting in defining the optimal margin for Gd-MRI and T2-MRI for the precise delineation of target volumes in radiation therapy planning for postoperative patients with GBM.

Introduction

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common type of primary brain tumor in adults, and the treatment of GBM remains one of the most challenging endeavors in oncologic treatment. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM is surgical resection, to the extent that it is feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy (1). Several studies over the past few decades have attempted to define the optimal radiation dose for GBM, yet the results have not been satisfying 2, 3, 4.

Highly accurate radiation therapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy, radiosurgery, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and proton therapy have recently developed. Improved survival by using such highly accurate radiation therapy is possible because high-dose irradiation to a limited target volume eradicates tumor cells while minimizing radiation exposure to normal, functional brain tissue. For this therapy to succeed, the first premise is that the extent of tumor must be correctly defined. Accurate definitions of the gross target volume (GTV) and the clinical target volume (CTV) are crucial.

To determine the radiation therapy treatment volume for GBM, many studies have used the enhanced area or peritumoral edema area on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), respectively, to determine initial radiation treatment volume as well as boost volume 5, 6, 7. For instance, the method for target delineation of GBM at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center has been to define the CTV as the enhanced area (GTV) plus 2 cm and the planning target volume (PTV) as the CTV plus 0.5 cm (5). An alternate method, used by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), is to define the initial field as the peritumoral edema plus 2 cm and the dose prescribed to this area is 46 Gy. The boost field is defined as the GTV plus 2.5 cm, and the dose prescribe to this area is 60 Gy 5, 6, 7. However, evidence for the margin of the enhanced area or the peritumoral edema of the GBM tumor is not sufficient (5).

Positron emission tomography (PET) has been used for 2 decades to assess the cerebral metabolism of patients with gliomas 8, 9. Carbon-11-labeled methionine PET ([11C]MET-PET) plays an especially important role in improving diagnostic procedures for treating brain tumors (10). [11C]Methionine is not taken up by normal brain tissue to a marked degree, and the sensitivity of [11C]MET-PET for detecting glioma tumors appears to be high 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. [11C]MET-PET uptake by normal brain parenchyma is relatively low, and so [11C]MET-PET shows promise for assessing cerebral tumor dimensions (17). It has been suggested that [11C]MET-PET may more precisely outline the true extent of viable tumor tissue than MRI, whereas MRI has the capability to better delineate the total extent of associated pathologic changes, such as edema, in adjacent brain areas (18).

We undertook the present study of quantified results of [11C]MET-PET and those of MRI to compare their abilities to delineate the extent of GBM and to show the implications of [11C]MET-PET for treatment planning. Therefore, the extent of gadolinium (Gd) enhancement on T1-weighted MRI and the high-intensity area on T2-weighted MRI were compared with the extent of uptake of [11C]MET-PET by using CT--MRI or CT--[11C]MET-PET fusion imaging. We conducted this study to investigate the extent to which tumor growth was present and to quantify this growth in GBM by comparing MRI and [11C]MET-PET. We assumed [11C]MET-PET was the gold standard in this study for delineating the CTV, and we determined the optimal margins of Gd enhancement and high-intensity areas on T2-weighted imaging. We evaluated the validity of the margins by comparison with those reported in a study by Jansen et al. (19), which correlated results of histopathologic observations with CT/MR images.

Section snippets

Methods and Materials

During the 2-year period between April 2006 and December 2008, 32 postoperative patients, newly diagnosed and histologically confirmed with GBM (Table 1), underwent stereotactic radiotherapy treatment planning at our department.

CT, Gd-enhanced T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI, and [11C]MET-PET were performed separately within 2 weeks after the 32 patients (18 men and 14 women; age range, 21-85 years; mean age, 64 years) underwent surgery. Steroid doses were not changed during the week in which

Results

The clinical characteristics and tumor locations of the 32 patients included in this study are given in Table 1. Patients were grouped according to the RTOG recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class (21). Most patients were put into RPA class IV (n = 19), and smaller numbers were in classes VI (n = 8), III (n = 3), and V (n = 8).

Table 2 shows sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CTV-Gd (x mm) and CTV-T2 (x mm). The sensitivity of CTV-Gd (20 mm) (86.4%) was significantly higher than that

Discussion

Brain tumor tissue can be visualized with MRI and CT because of the increased water content (edema) compared with normal brain tissue and because of disruption of the blood--brain barrier, and the tumor tissue is visualized as contrast enhancement. However, neither contrast enhancement nor edema is always a real measure of the extent of tumor for gliomas. Tumor cells have been detected beyond the margins of contrast enhancement, in the surrounding edema and even in adjacent brain tissue that

Conclusion

It is necessary to use a margin of at least 2 cm in T2-MRI for the initial target planning of radiation therapy. However, in radiation planning for postoperative patients with GBM, the CTV-Gd and CTV-T2 margins differed considerably from that of CTV- [11C]MET-PET. There is a limit to the optimal margin in this setting of the Gd-MRI and T2-MRI. Thus, rather than using Gd-MRI and T2-MRI, [11C]MET-PET has promising potential for precisely delineating target volumes in planning radiation therapy

References (32)

  • J.L. Chan et al.

    Survival and failure patterns of high-grade gliomas after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2002)
  • G. Di Chiro et al.

    Glucose utilization of cerebral gliomas measured by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography

    Neurology

    (1982)
  • N.J. Patronas et al.

    Glycolytic rate (PET) and contrast enhancement (CT) in human cerebral gliomas

    Am J Nucl Res

    (1983)
  • M. Bergstrom et al.

    Discrepancies in brain tumor extent as shown by computed tomography and positron emission tomography using [68Ga]EDTA [11C]glucose, and [11C]methionine

    J Comput Assist Tomogr

    (1983)
  • J.M. Derlon et al.

    [11C]l-methionine uptake in gliomas

    Neurosurgery

    (1989)
  • A. Lilja et al.

    Dynamic study of supratentorial gliomas with l-methyl-11C-methionine and positron emission tomography

    Am J Neuroradiol

    (1985)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Dissociation Between 11C-Methionine-Positron Emission Tomography and Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Longitudinal Features of Glioblastoma After Postoperative Radiotherapy

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      This dose was prescribed using the 95% isodose line, which covered the GTV-1. The irradiation dose of the organs at risk (eye, optic nerve, and brain stem) was planned to be <5 Gy.18,19 Patients received concomitant TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m2/day during the simultaneously integrated boost with hypofractionated IMRT, followed by adjuvant TMZ at a dose of 150–200 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 28 days, in accordance with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–National Cancer Institute of Canada regimen,1 starting 1 month after RT completion.

    • <sup>11</sup>C-methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation of recurrent glioblastoma in re-irradiation planning

      2018, Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      When the irradiation is targeted to these CTVs, some part of the tumor would not be irradiated in most cases. The study in27 focused on patients with GBM receiving initial therapy; it is necessary to add at least a 2-cm margin for the high-intensity area on T2-weighted images. In this study, the sensitivity of the CTV-Gd was only 57%.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflict of interest: none.

    View full text