Collaborative Review – Prostate CancerPositive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy: Outlining the Problem and Its Long-Term Consequences
Introduction
The ultimate success of any cancer operation with curative intent relies on complete surgical extirpation of the tumor. Cancer cells at the inked surgical resection margin may suggest an incomplete local resection and suboptimal patient outcome [1]. The importance of achieving negative surgical margins to reducing the risk of recurrence is paramount and has been recognized in all solid malignancies, including prostate cancer (PCa). However, despite the evolution of surgical technique and the introduction of novel surgical approaches, positive surgical margins (PSM) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens are not uncommon, leading to an increased risk of biochemical, local, and possibly systemic disease progression. Unfortunately, the optimal treatment strategy for men with PSM remains open to disagreement.
In this review, we focus on the issue of PSM in PCa, addressing the pathologic pitfalls confounding surgical margins interpretation and the impact of PSM on long-term oncologic outcomes, providing technical recommendations to help surgeons minimize their positive margin rate, and discussing available data to assist clinicians in counseling patients with PSM after RP.
Section snippets
Evidence acquisition
A literature search in English was performed using the National Library of Medicine database and the following key words: prostate cancer, surgical margins, and radical prostatectomy. A free-text strategy was applied without limiting the year of publication. Seven hundred sixty-eight references were initially scrutinized, and 115 pertinent publications were identified and rigorously reviewed. Reference lists of retrieved articles were scrutinized for additional relevant articles. Seventy-three
Surgical recommendations and lessons learned
The goals of RP are to remove the cancer completely with negative surgical margins, minimize perioperative complications, and optimize recovery of potency and urinary continence. No surgeon uniformly achieves these results [27]. RP is one of the most complex operations urologists perform, and outcomes are highly sensitive to technique. The success of surgery and the incidence of PSM vary greatly among surgeons [28], [29]. Even among highly experienced surgeons, intraoperative video
Conclusions
PSM in RP specimens are uniformly acknowledged as an adverse outcome indicator associated with an increased hazard of BCR and local disease recurrence as well as the need for secondary cancer treatment. Tumor biology (volume, distribution, and aggressiveness) and surgical factors (type of procedure, technique, and experience) are the primary determinants of margin status. Although a PSM at the posterolateral location appears to confer the greatest probability of relapse, the prognostic
References (73)
- et al.
Do close but negative margins in radical prostatectomy specimens increase the risk of postoperative progression?
J Urol
(1997) - et al.
Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy
Urology
(1997) - et al.
Should a positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy be pathological stage T2 or T3? Results from the SEARCH database
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1,000 cases a Montsouris Institute
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
Urology
(2007) - et al.
Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients
Urology
(2005) - et al.
Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Biochemical failure in men following radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact of surgical margin status and location
J Urol
(2004) - et al.
Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
J Urol
(2005) - et al.
Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment: data from the CaPSURE database
J Urol
(2000)
An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series
J Urol
The actual value of the surgical margin status as a predictor of disease progression in men with early prostate cancer
Eur Urol
Prostate specific antigen recurrence rates are low after radical retropubic prostatectomy and positive margins
J Urol
Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer?
Urology
Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression
J Urol
The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens
Hum Pathol
Pathological features and prognostic significance of prostate cancer in the apical section determined by whole mount histology
J Urol
Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression
Urology
Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
J Urol
Quality improvement in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer: impact of video documentation review on positive surgical margin
J Urol
Use of intraoperative video documentation to improve sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy
Urology
Risk-adjusted analysis of positive surgical margins following laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy
Eur Urol
Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
Eur Urol
Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results
Eur Urol
Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique
Eur Urol
Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy
Eur Urol
Positive surgical margins and accessory pudendal artery preservation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
Eur Urol
Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy
Urol Clin North Am
Preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for side-specific positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
Eur Urol
The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
J Urol
Influence of nerve-sparing (NS) procedure during radical prostatectomy (RP) on margin status and biochemical failure
Eur Urol
Dynamic endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for local staging and detection of neurovascular bundle involvement of prostate cancer: correlation with histopathologic results
Urology
Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins
J Urol
Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination
J Urol
Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy
J Urol
Invasion of Denonvilliers’ fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens
J Urol
Cited by (206)
Optimization of ODAP-Urea-based dual-modality PSMA targeting probes for sequential PET-CT and optical imaging
2022, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry