Morphological and functional MRI, MRS, perfusion and diffusion changes after radiosurgery of brain metastasis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.08.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Radiosurgery is a noninvasive procedure where spatially accurate and highly conformal doses of radiation are targeted at brain lesions with an ablative intent. Recently, radiosurgery has been established as an effective technique for local treatment of brain metastasis. After radiosurgery, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging plays an important role in the assessment of the therapeutic response and of any complications. The therapeutic approach depends on the imaging findings obtained after radiosurgery, which have a role in the decision making to perform additional invasive modalities (repeat resection, biopsy) to obtain a definite diagnosis and to improve the survival of patients. Conventional MR imaging findings are mainly based on morphological alterations of tumors. However, there are variable imaging findings of radiation-induced changes including radiation necrosis in the brain. Radiologists are sometimes confused by radiation-induced injuries, including radiation necrosis, that are seen on conventional MR imaging. The pattern of abnormal enhancement on follow-up conventional MR imaging closely mimics that of a recurrent brain metastasis. So, classifying newly developed abnormal enhancing lesions in follow-up of treated brain metastasis with correct diagnosis is one of the key goals in neuro-oncologic imaging. To overcome limitations of the use of morphology-based conventional MR imaging, several physiological-based functional MR imaging methods have been used, namely diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion MR imaging, and proton MR spectroscopy, for the detection of hemodynamic, metabolic, and cellular alterations. These imaging modalities provide additional information to allow clinicians to make proper decisions regarding patient treatment.

Introduction

Radiosurgery has been widely used to treat meningiomas, schwannomas, pituitary adenomas, metastatic brain tumors, malignant gliomas and other neurological diseases as an alternative method in place of surgical resection [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Follow-up imaging studies are needed to assess the results of radiosurgery and to detect any complications. The introduction of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has revolutionized the clinical effectiveness of radiosurgery by improving the identification and characterization of target tissues by precisely characterizing treatment response. The role of MR imaging in assessing the response to radiosurgery in post-treatment has been studied for variable diseases [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Conventional MR imaging is an anatomy-based procedure and morphologic alterations are the key to resolve abnormal findings on follow-up imaging studies after radiosurgery. However, the histological response of brain normal tissue and tumors to radiosurgery has confounded correct follow-up evaluations. Recurrent tumors and radiation-induced changes often appear at the same location within or near the region of the irradiated area, and both occurrences resemble contrast-enhancing, expansile brain lesions surrounded by edema. It is difficult with the use of conventional MR imaging to assess abnormal imaging findings after radiosurgery as lesions that are related to a residual or recurrent brain tumor, or as lesions that are related to non-tumorous, radiation-induced changes [14]. Thus, an accurate diagnosis of radiation-induced changes on MR imaging has been challenging. If a lesion deviates from usual conventional MR imaging findings on follow-up, additional information is required to make a correct diagnosis using functional MR imaging. Currently, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), perfusion-weighted imaging, and proton MR spectroscopy are used as physiological-based functional MR imaging methods. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is based on the detection of changes in the random motion of protons in water, and its use enables the characterization of tissues and pathological processes at a microscopic level [15], [16]. Perfusion-weighted imaging is an important tool to measure the degree of brain tumor angiogenesis and capillary permeability, both of which are major biological markers of malignancy, grading, and prognosis, especially for gliomas [17], [18], [19], [20]. MR spectroscopy can provide a noninvasive window to analyze neurometabolism. Pattern analysis of MR spectroscopy data can be successfully applied to detect metabolic alterations of brain tumors and other non-neoplastic lesions [21], [22].

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the radiation biology to understand MR imaging changes. In addition, this review evaluates conventional and functional MR imaging after radiosurgery of metastatic brain tumors in order to obtain more accurate follow-up results and ultimately to improve patient clinical outcome.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Written informed consent was obtained from every patient prior to treatment. From January 2004 to October 2007, 429 patients with brain metastasis were treated with 566 radiosurgery procedures at our institution. The mean age of patients was 56.4 years (range: 30–83 years). There were 208 men and 221 women. The primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 267), breast cancer (n = 61), renal cell carcinoma (n = 41), colorectal cancer (n = 23), gynecologic cancer (n = 12), and others (25), respectively.

For the

Radiation biology

Radiosurgery utilizes ionizing radiation. When ionizing radiation interacts with a cell, it can interact with water, lipids, proteins, carbohydrates and nucleotides. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is most likely the critical target for cellular radiation effects. Damage to DNA creates permanent cell injury or death. Injuries of other intracellular molecules such as lipids or proteins can also play a role in the cellular effects of radiation. Radiation may indirectly lead to cell death mediated by

Conventional MR imaging

The temporal biological effects of radiosurgery on normal brain tissue have been classified into three stages: (i) an early stage, with edema in the central region of the area treated by radiosurgery showing a swelling of the lesion and perilesional edema; (ii) an intermediate stage, with progressive cavitation and capillary proliferation surrounding the necrotic center, an occurrence compatible with ring enhancement and minute perilesional edema; (iii) a late stage, with central necrosis and a

Functional MR imaging

The radiological differentiation of radiation-induced changes from recurrence or progression after radiosurgery for brain tumor remains a challenge despite improvement of morphological-based conventional MR imaging. Although a lesion shows an increase in the degree of enhancement and the size of perilesional edema in addition to a blurred margin of a lesion on follow-up MR imaging after radiosurgery, these imaging findings are not always compatible for tumor recurrence [14], [33].

Prognostic factors in MR imaging

With conventional MR imaging, an abnormal enhancing lesion after brain metastatic tumor radiosurgery shows a decrease in perilesional edema, the degree of enhancement, and a decrease of mass size with a more discrete margin, representing good prognosis as seen on serial follow up imaging studies. With functional MR imaging, an abnormal enhancing lesion after brain metastatic tumor radiosurgery shows diffusion restriction by diffusion-weighted imaging, and an increase in the value of the rCBV in

Summary

Conventional MR imaging is a useful tool for follow-up of a brain metastatic tumor after radiosurgery. However, radiologists are sometimes confused by radiation-induced changes including radiation necrosis seen on conventional MR imaging. To overcome these limitations, the use of functional MR imaging can lead to more accurate follow-up findings and ultimately to an improved patient clinical outcome.

References (45)

  • W.W. Lam et al.

    Diffusion MR imaging in glioma: does it have any role in the pre-operation determination of grading of glioma?

    Clin Radiol

    (2002)
  • D.P. Friedman et al.

    Stereotactic radiosurgical pallidotomy and thalamotomy with the gamma knife: MR imaging findings with clinical correlation--preliminary experience

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • A.J. Ulm et al.

    Radiosurgery in the treatment of malignant gliomas: the University of Florida experience

    Neurosurgery

    (2005)
  • A.K. Bindal et al.

    Surgery versus radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastasis

    J Neurosurg

    (1996)
  • D. Kondziolka et al.

    Stereotactic radiosurgery of meningiomas

    J Neurosurg

    (1991)
  • J.C. Flickinger et al.

    Results of acoustic neuroma radiosurgery: an analysis of 5 years’ experience using current methods

    J Neurosurg

    (2001)
  • M. Izawa et al.

    Gamma knife radiosurgery for pituitary adenomas

    J Neurosurg

    (2000)
  • J.H. Suh et al.

    Update of stereotactic radiosurgery for brain tumors

    Curr Opin Neurol

    (2004)
  • H. Nakamura et al.

    Serial follow-up MR imaging after gamma knife radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2000)
  • J. Shinoda et al.

    Radiological response and histological changes in malignant astrocytic tumors after stereotactic radiosurgery

    Brain Tumor Pathol

    (2002)
  • A.M. Peterson et al.

    MR imaging response of brain metastases after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

    Radiology

    (1999)
  • G.A. Tung et al.

    MR imaging of pituitary adenomas after gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2001)
  • D.P. Friedman et al.

    MR imaging findings after stereotactic radiosurgery using the gamma knife

    AJR Am J Roentgenol

    (2001)
  • O.W. Meijer et al.

    Tumor-volume changes after radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma: implications for follow-up MR imaging protocol

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2008)
  • M.E. Mullins et al.

    Radiation necrosis versus glioma recurrence: conventional MR imaging clues to diagnosis

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2005)
  • C. Asao et al.

    Diffusion-weighted imaging of radiation-induced brain injury for differentiation from tumor recurrence

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2005)
  • P.A. Hein et al.

    Diffusion-weighted imaging in the follow-up of treated high-grade gliomas: tumor recurrence versus radiation injury

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2004)
  • J.L. Boxerman et al.

    Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2006)
  • S.J. Lee et al.

    Perfusion MR imaging in gliomas: comparison with histologic tumor grade

    Korean J Radiol

    (2001)
  • A.C. Maia et al.

    MR cerebral blood volume maps correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and tumor grade in nonenhancing gliomas

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2005)
  • M. Law et al.

    Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2004)
  • E.E. Graves et al.

    Serial proton MR spectroscopic imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas after gamma knife radiosurgery

    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

    (2001)
  • Cited by (47)

    • The development of numerous radiation-induced cavernous malformations in a germ cell tumor patient: A case report

      2021, Current Problems in Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      They are occasionally surrounded by a perilesional edema with a high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and with a low signal intensity on T1-weighted images.15,16 The tumor volume tends to decrease along with the surrounding edema, causing the margin to appear blurred over time.17 Therefore, it may be helpful to compare images before and after treatment.

    • Therapy Monitoring with Functional and Molecular MR Imaging

      2016, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
    • Comparison between magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion weighted imaging in the evaluation of gliomas response after treatment

      2015, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      It contributes to accurately define margins but it shows some limitations in defining tumor size and activity, due to vascular damage, for LGG that in 90% of cases don't show contrast enhancement and are better evaluable in T2 and FLAIR sequences [8]. Today MRI benefits from the use of functional imaging techniques, such as diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) [11] and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) [12], that may allow early detection of treatment induced changes in tumor biology and physiology. The DWI and the derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to evaluate the radiation damage or disease recurrence after radiotherapy in brain tumors, lower values of ADC are related to a reduced diffusivity of water molecules in the extracellular compartment for greater cellularity, so in tumor recurrence, than in areas of radio necrosis, there is a higher ADC value [13].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +82 2 3410 2507; fax: +82 2 3410 2559.

    View full text