Elsevier

Cancer Treatment Reviews

Volume 32, Issue 6, October 2006, Pages 423-436
Cancer Treatment Reviews

TUMOUR REVIEW
Primary bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age: State of the art

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.05.005Get rights and content

Summary

The current combination treatment, chemotherapy and surgery, has significantly improved the cure rate and the survival rate of primary bone osteosarcoma. The 5-year survival rate has increased in the last 30 years from 10% to 70%. Even in patients with poor prognosis, such as those with metastases at diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate has reached 20–30% due to chemotherapy and the surgical removal of metastases and primary tumor. However, the most effective drugs are still the same as those employed over the last 20 years as front line neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy: Doxorubicin, Cisplatin, Methotrexate, Ifosfamide. No standard, second line therapy exists for those who relapse. At relapse, due to the lack of new non-cross-resistant drugs, surgery is still the main option when feasible. Other drugs have been employed in relapsed patients with poor results. This article reviews the state of the art of treatment for bone osteosarcoma in the pediatric age.

Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone tumor in childhood and adolescence. It usually involves long bones and is a highly aggressive tumor that metastasizes primarily to the lung.1 Until 30 years ago, when surgery was the only therapy, most patients died within 1 year from diagnosis, and the overall 5-year survival rate was 10%. With the present protocols of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (4–6 cycles with the four most effective drugs before surgery and 9–13 cycles postoperatively) the 10-year disease free survival (DFS) is about 60% in patients with localized disease, and around 30% in patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis.2, 3, 4 The incidence of OS is about 3 new cases per million people per year. The median peak age is 16 years, and males are affected more than females with a ratio of 1.6:1; females have a peak incidence a little earlier than males due to the earlier onset of their growth spurt.5, 6

Section snippets

Etiology

Exposure to radiation is the only proven exogenous risk factor but with a long interval, 10–20 years,7 so radiation-induced osteosarcoma is typical of adult age and is very rare.

There is an association with a number of rare inherited syndromes8, 9, 10, 11, 12 like hereditary bilateral retinoblastoma, Li–Fraumeni syndrome, Bloom syndrome, Rothmund–Thomson syndrome or in association with multiple exostoses, and Paget’s disease. But the majority of osteosarcomas occur without a familial

Clinical presentation and diagnosis

Pain is usually but not always the first symptom.1 It usually arises after strenuous exercise or a trauma, usually appearing 2–4 months before diagnosis,3 and progressing over time. Swelling appears later with a hard consistency mass. Pathologic fracture can occur. The laboratory findings may show an increase in alkaline phosphatase (AP) and in 30% of cases an increase in lactic de-hydrogenase.31 In the absence of metastases abnormal AP values are correlated with tumor volume and prognosis;32

Treatment of localized osteosarcoma

Surgery is still the cornerstone of OS treatment, but alone it cannot cure patients. Until the 1970s, OS was treated by surgery (mostly amputation) or radiotherapy alone. Despite good local control, most patients died within a short time as a result of metastases, the first location of which was nearly always pulmonary. With surgery alone, the 5-year DFS was 12%, and 3 out of 4 patients died within 2 years of diagnosis. For this reason, in 1970 adjuvant chemotherapy was conceived. Doxorubicin

Chemotherapy toxicity

Nearly a half of young adult survivors of childhood cancer have at least one major adverse outcome of their health status as a result of their cancer therapy.71

Early toxicity consists of hematological toxicity (manageable with growth factors), acute liver (MTX) and renal toxicity (CDP and IFO). Longer survival has led to the increase in late chemotherapy toxicity. The main late toxicities are: cardiac, second tumor, sterility, chronic renal failure and neurologic toxicities (mainly ototoxicity

Treatment of primary metastatic osteosarcoma and multifocal osteosarcoma

About 20% of osteosarcomas are metastatic at presentation. For patients with a good performance status a multiple aggressive treatment with chemotherapy and surgery of the primary tumor and all metastases is the standard therapy. However, despite aggressive treatment, mean 5-year EFS is 30% ranging from 16% (European Osteosarcoma Intergroup; 45 patient)84 to 53% (Pediatric Oncology Group; 30 pts).85.

In a COSS study86 on 202 patients with metastases at diagnosis only 60 were alive after a median

Treatment of metastatic relapsed osteosarcoma

Despite chemotherapy and surgical resection, 30–40% of patients with localized osteosarcoma of the extremities relapse, mostly within the first 3 years of diagnosis. Recurrence of osteosarcoma is most common in the lungs. The achievement of a complete remission of recurrent disease is the most important prognostic factor at first relapse with an overall survival after recurrence that ranges from 13% to 57%.90, 91 Series on relapsed osteosarcoma are small and often heterogeneous including

Radiotherapy

Osteosarcoma is known to be quite resistant to RT.

Anyway, in certain locations (pelvis, vertebra) where surgery is not feasible or for palliation in case of bone metastases or in multifocal osteosarcoma, radiotherapy can prolong survival and control pain. A recent study110 reported the results of radiotherapy in 41 patients who received 10–80 Gy for osteosarcoma located in the face/head (17 patients), spine (8), the pelvis (7), and in the trunk (1). The 5-year overall local control rate was 68% ± 

New experimental drugs

Some studies have been published on drugs not commonly used in first line treatments of osteosarcoma. Some of them are quite promising.

Topotecan, employed in 26 metastatic OS patients at presentation followed by multiagent chemotherapy, did not show an effective improvement over traditional chemotherapy.113

Gemcitabine was employed alone with minimal response,114 but in one study it was employed together with Docetaxel in 35 patients with different sarcomas and a RR of 43% was reported.115

Surgery

In the past 20 years, the use of amputation has progressively decreased and more patients have been treated by local resection and functional reconstruction of the limb in almost 90% of cases.124, 125 The type of surgical procedure depends not only on tumor stage, and response to adjuvant treatments, but also on the patient’s age, gender, general condition, life expectancy and quality of life. The percentage of local recurrence is strictly correlated to resection margins and to response to

Prognostic factors

Many studies have been performed to determine the most reliable prognostic factors.

Significant prognostic factors are: first of all metastatic vs localized disease with a difference in 5-year EFS of 60–70% vs. 20–30%, tumor necrosis after preoperative chemotherapy, tumor site (limbs vs. axial skeleton), surgical margins, and tumor volume.

Coss55 studied 1702 patients over 18 years and found that significant prognostic factors were: primary metastases vs. localized (10-year EFS of 26% vs. 64.4%, P

Conclusions

A lot of progress has been made in the treatment of osteosarcoma over the last 30 years, due to chemotherapy development and surgery improvement. A multi-disciplinary approach has increased the number of conservative procedures (85%) and the probability of a better prognosis up to a 70% 5-year DFS for non-metastatic patients.

We think that the best approach to osteosarcoma can be obtained in specialized centers with a very skilled multidisciplinary team and the possibility to evaluate

References (166)

  • E. Cvitkovic

    Cumulative toxicity from Cisplatin therapy and current cytoprotective measures

    Cancer Treat Rev

    (1998)
  • P.A. Voute et al.

    A phase II study of cisplatin, ifosfamide and doxorubicin in operable primary axial,skeletal and metastatic osteosarcoma: European Sarcoma Intergroup (EOI)

    Ann Oncol

    (1999)
  • G. Bacci et al.

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities with metastases at presentation: recent experience at the Rizzoli Institute in 57 patients treated with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and a high dose of methotrexate and ifosfamide

    Ann Oncol

    (2003)
  • N. Martini et al.

    Multiple pulmonary resections in the treatment of osteogenic sarcoma

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (1971)
  • M. Campanacci

    Bone tumors

    (1999)
  • G. Bacci et al.

    Long-term outcome for patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity treated at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli according to the IOR/OS2 protocol: an update report

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • A. Huvos

    Bone tumors :diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

    (1991)
  • S. Bielack et al.

    Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities. Results from the Cooperative osteosarcoma study group COSS of 925 patients

    Klin Padiatr

    (1999)
  • M. Rytting et al.

    Osteosarcoma in preadolescent patients

    Clin Orthop

    (2000)
  • J.F. Fraumeni

    Stature and malignant tumors of bones in childhood and adolescence

    Cancer

    (1967)
  • A. Longhi et al.

    Radiation-induced osteosarcoma arising 20 years after the treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma

    Tumorigenesis

    (2003)
  • B. Fuchs et al.

    Etiology of osteosarcoma

    Clin Orthop

    (2002)
  • J.J. Swaney

    Familial osteogenic sarcoma

    Clin Orthop

    (1973)
  • J.W. Smith et al.

    Familial cancer: the occurrence of bone cancer in male members of a family in multiple generations

    Clin Res

    (1980)
  • L.L. Wang et al.

    Association between osteosarcoma and deleterious mutations in the RECQL4 gene in Rothmund–Thomson syndrome

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2003)
  • M.F. Hansen

    Molecular genetic considerations in osteosarcoma

    Clin Orthop

    (1991)
  • R.B. Scholtz et al.

    Studies of the RB1 gene and p53 gene in human osteosarcoma

    Pediatr Hematol Oncol

    (1992)
  • T.P. Drya et al.

    Chromosome 13 homozygosity in osteosarcoma without retinoblastoma

    Am J Hum Genet

    (1986)
  • J.G. Gurney et al.

    Incidence of cancer in children in the United States. Sex-, race-, and 1-year age-specific rates by histologic type

    Cancer

    (1995)
  • H. Masuda et al.

    Rearrangement of the p53 gene in human osteogenic osteosarcomas

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1987)
  • P. Ragazzini et al.

    Analysis of SAS gene and CDK4 and MDM2 proteins in low grade osteosarcoma

    Cancer Detect Prev

    (1999)
  • Z.A. Khatib et al.

    Coamplification of the CDK4 gene with MDM2 and GLI in human sarcomas

    Cancer Res

    (1993)
  • H. Barrios et al.

    Amplification of the c-myc proto-oncogene in soft tissue sarcomas

    Oncology

    (1994)
  • S. Van den Berg et al.

    Overexpression of the c-fos increases recombination frequency in human osteosarcoma cells

    Carcinogenesis

    (1993)
  • M.P. Finkel et al.

    Virus induction of osteosarcomas in mice

    Science

    (1966)
  • S.M. Mendoza et al.

    Integration of SV40 in human osteosarcoma DNA

    Oncogene

    (1998)
  • E.A. Engels

    Cancer risk associated with receipt of vaccines contaminated with simian virus 40: epidemiologic research

    Expert Rev Vaccines

    (2005)
  • K.H. Gelberg et al.

    Growth and development and other risk factors for osteosarcoma in children and young adults

    Int J Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • S.J. Withrow et al.

    Comparative aspects of osteosarcoma. Dog versus man

    Clin Orthop Related Res

    (1991)
  • R.A. Tjalma

    Canine bone sarcoma: estimation of relative risk as a function of body size

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1966)
  • S.J. Cotterill et al.

    Stature of young people with malignant bone tumors

    Pediatr Blood Cancer

    (2004)
  • A. Longhi et al.

    Height as a risk factor for osteosarcoma

    J Ped Hem Oncol

    (2005)
  • M.P. Link et al.

    Adjuvant chemotherapy of high grade osteosarcoma of the extremity. Update results of Multi-Institutional Osteosarcoma Study

    Clin Orthop

    (1991)
  • G. Bacci et al.

    Prognostic significance of serum alkaline phosphatase in osteosarcoma of the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: recent experience at Rizzoli Institute

    Oncol Rep

    (2002)
  • E. Hannisdal et al.

    Alterations of blood analyses at relapse of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma

    Acta Oncol

    (1990)
  • G.M. Jeffree et al.

    The metastatic spread of osteosarcoma

    Br J Cancer

    (1975)
  • K.R. Sajadi et al.

    The incidence and prognosis of osteosarcoma skip metastases

    Clin Orthop Relat Res

    (2004)
  • D.C. Dahlin

    Osteosarcoma of bone and a consideration of prognostic variables

    Cancer Treat Rep

    (1978)
  • M.P. Link et al.

    Osteosarcoma in principles and practice of pediatric oncology

    (2002)
  • A.M. Aisen et al.

    MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft tissue tumours

    Am J Roentgenol

    (1986)
  • Cited by (552)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text