Taxanes in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Efficacy and management of toxicity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.02.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Androgen deprivation is the therapy of choice in the majority of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. However, a state of castration resistance ultimately occurs after hormone therapy, thus defining metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). mCRPC has historically been considered a relatively chemoresistant tumor. However, due to its ability to improve survival and the quality of life in comparison with mitoxantrone, docetaxel has been established as the standard chemotherapeutic agent for first-line therapy since 2004. Moreover, recent results have shown that the novel taxane cabazitaxel is able to prolong the overall survival of patients with mCRPC previously treated with docetaxel. Even though these taxanes display a favorable toxicity profile, their routine use in clinical practice requires knowledge about the most frequent and distinct adverse events that may result from their administration.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed at early stages, often through transrectal biopsy triggered by elevated levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) [1], [2]. In part due to the PSA screening programs, it is now the most common cancer in the male population in the United States, with an estimated 241,740 new cases in 2012 [2]. Despite its indolent course in most cases and the curability of localized disease by prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy in most patients, nearly over 10,000 men in the US alone are newly diagnosed with metastatic disease each year, and many other recur after local therapy, and it was responsible for an estimated 28,170 deaths in 2012 [2], [3], [4]. For these patients, who typically have involvement of the axial skeleton, treatment is done with a palliative intent and often consists in androgen deprivation through surgical or pharmacological means [5]. Due to the reliance of prostate cancer cells on testosterone, androgen deprivation is initially active in 80–90% of patients and is associated with median progression-free survival (PFS) times that range from 12 to 30 months after treatment initiation [5], [6]. However, prostate tumor cells eventually acquire the ability to proliferate in a serum androgen-depleted environment [3], [7], and a median overall survival (OS) of only 8–16 months has been historically observed after the appearance of such androgen independency [5], [6]. Along the years, the terms ‘androgen-independent’, and ‘hormone-refractory’, were used interchangeably – but today given the demonstrated sensitivity of CRPC to various androgen-targeted therapies, castrate-resistant is the current preferred term [8] – to denote disease that progresses despite castrate levels of testosterone [9], [10]. Over the past 15 years, substantial progress has been achieved in the treatment of patients with of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with chemotherapy. In the following review, we will present historical developments and current perspectives on the treatment of these patients with taxanes, the most active class of chemotherapeutic agents in this setting.

Section snippets

Historical development of chemotherapy for mCRPC

Historically, prostate cancer has been considered a relatively chemoresistant tumor. Until the early 90s, several authors pointed out that the response rates to the agents that were then available were typically low and varied widely [11], [12], [13]. Moreover, authors postulated that the documentation of responses in metastatic prostate cancer was complicated by the lack of established criteria, as nearly 80% of patients with this disease have no measurable soft tissue lesions [14]. Thus,

Docetaxel in the first line

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane that is able to inhibit the depolymerization of microtubules approximately twice as effectively as paclitaxel in pre-clinical models [33]. After the demonstration of its promising single-agent activity in phase II trials in mCRPC [34], [35], docetaxel was assessed in two phase III trials with slightly different designs [28], [36]. In the first trial, named TAX 327, 1006 patients with mCRPC were randomized to receive mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks),

Cabazitaxel in the second line

Cabazitaxel, a novel taxane identified in a systematic screening for novel compounds in this class, is active in preclinical models that are resistant to paclitaxel and docetaxel [44], [45]. Cabazitaxel inhibits the depolymerization of microtubules as effectively as docetaxel [46]. Furthermore, pre clinical models show that cabazitaxel is able to cross the blood–brain barrier, a potential advantage in the treatment of some malignancies [44]. Based on the results of phase I and II trials,

Incidence and management of taxane-associated toxicity

Despite their activity, all taxanes are associated with adverse events that may compromise patient quality of life and that may lead to dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment, potentially compromising its efficacy. In some circumstances, inadequately managed toxicity may outweigh the potential benefits of treatment with these agents. Thus, knowledge about the most frequent and the most distinct adverse events that may result from their administration is one of the keys to the successful

Conclusions

The introduction of docetaxel started a new era for patients with mCRPC, whose median OS was extended for the first time in randomized trials [28], [36]. Over the past 5 years, additional progress has resulted from the introduction of novel agents, including cabazitaxel, abiraterone, ezalutamide and radium-223, with activity in docetaxel-refractory disease and with the potential to improve OS also in the second line [49], [52], [53], [70]. As a result, a median OS approaching 30 months can now

Conflict of interest

FAS: None to declare.

ACB: Member of the advisory board of Sanofi-Aventis.

OS: Investigator and consultant, Sanofi.

Role of the funding source

Editorial support was provided by Dr. Everardo D. Saad from Dendrix Ltd. and supported by Sanofi. Neither Dendrix Ltd. nor Sanofi had any role in the final content of this manuscript. The authors had the final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Reviewers

Joaquim Bellmunt, MD, PhD, Section Chief, Solid Tumor Oncology (GU & GI), Hospital del Mar, Medical Oncology Service, Passeig Marítimo 25-29, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain.

Prof. Cora Sternberg, San Camillo and Forlanini Hospitals, Department of Medical Oncology, Nuovi Padiglioni, Circonvallazione Gianicolense 87, I-00152 Rome, Italy.

Dr. Dominik R. Berthold, Medical Oncology, Rue Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dr. Everardo D. Saad for the editorial support in this manuscript.

Dr. Fabio A.B. Schutz is a former Research Associate at Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology department. Currently, Dr. Schutz is a staff medical oncologist of Hospital Sao Jose and the clinical coordinator of Medical Oncology of the Hospital Sao Joaquim from the Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo. Dr. Schutz authored and co-authored several manuscripts in genitourinary oncology.

References (71)

  • S. Oudard et al.

    Impact of cabazitaxel (CBZ) + prednisone (P) on overall survival (OS) at 2 yrs and in patients (pts) with aggressive disease: post-hoc analyses of TROPIC trial

    Ann Oncol

    (2012)
  • A. Heidenreich et al.

    Cabazitaxel plus prednisone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel: results from the German compassionate-use programme

    Eur Urol

    (2013)
  • J. Baker et al.

    Docetaxel-related side effects and their management

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2009)
  • M.S. Aapro et al.

    2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours

    Eur J Cancer

    (2011)
  • B. Esmaeli et al.

    Canalicular stenosis secondary to weekly docetaxel: a potentially preventable side effect

    Ann Oncol

    (2002)
  • K.R. Broglio et al.

    Detecting an overall survival benefit that is derived from progression-free survival

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2009)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2012

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2012)
  • K.J. Pienta et al.

    Advances in prostate cancer chemotherapy: a new era begins

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2005)
  • E.G. Garmey et al.

    Second-line chemotherapy for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer

    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol

    (2008)
  • B.A. Hellerstedt et al.

    The current state of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2002)
  • M. Diaz et al.

    Management of androgen-independent prostate cancer

    Cancer Control

    (2004)
  • H.I. Scher et al.

    Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • E.D. Crawford et al.

    Castration-resistant prostate cancer: descriptive yet pejorative?

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • H.I. Scher et al.

    Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • E.M. Basch et al.

    American Society of Clinical Oncology endorsement of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guideline on nonhormonal therapy for men with metastatic hormone-refractory (castration-resistant) prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • M.A. Eisenberger et al.

    A reevaluation of nonhormonal cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma

    J Clin Oncol

    (1985)
  • A. Yagoda et al.

    Cytotoxic chemotherapy for advanced hormone-resistant prostate cancer

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • W.D. Figg et al.

    Lack of correlation between prostate-specific antigen and the presence of measurable soft tissue metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

    Cancer Invest

    (1996)
  • W.K. Kelly et al.

    Prostate-specific antigen as a measure of disease outcome in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (1993)
  • G.J. Bubley et al.

    Eligibility and response guidelines for phase II clinical trials in androgen-independent prostate cancer: recommendations from the Prostate-Specific Antigen Working Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • L. Collette et al.

    Is prostate-specific antigen a valid surrogate end point for survival in hormonally treated patients with metastatic prostate cancer? Joint research of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Limburgs Universitair Centrum, and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals

    J Clin Oncol

    (2005)
  • A.J. Armstrong et al.

    Prostate-specific antigen and pain surrogacy analysis in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2007)
  • S. Halabi et al.

    Prostate-specific antigen changes as surrogate for overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • M. Hussain et al.

    Prostate-specific antigen progression predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer: data from Southwest Oncology Group Trials 9346 (Intergroup Study 0162) and 9916

    J Clin Oncol

    (2009)
  • G. Hudes et al.

    Vinblastine versus vinblastine plus oral estramustine phosphate for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group and Fox Chase Network phase III trial

    J Clin Oncol

    (1999)
  • Cited by (27)

    • Three-year Safety of Radium-223 Dichloride in Patients with Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and Symptomatic Bone Metastases from Phase 3 Randomized Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer Trial

      2018, European Urology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Agents approved for use in patients with CRPC have been associated with significant toxicities. These include the taxanes docetaxel and cabazitaxel, which have a range of chemotherapy-related effects [4–6]. Beta-emitting radiopharmaceuticals such as strontium-89 and samarium-153, used for pain palliation in CRPC patients with bone metastases, are associated with significant myelosuppression [1,2,7,8].

    • A new approach to produce drug nanosuspensions CO<inf>2</inf>-assisted effervescence to produce drug nanosuspensions

      2016, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we investigated the efficiency of ISN for producing CTX nanosuspensions for intravenous administration. Due to its poor water solubility, CTX is clinically formulated using Tween 80 and ethanol (JEVTANA®), which may cause severe side effects such as hypersensitivity, neurotoxicity, allergic reaction, etc [13]. The pharmaceutical form of JEVTANA® includes a concentrate vial and solvent vial.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dr. Fabio A.B. Schutz is a former Research Associate at Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology department. Currently, Dr. Schutz is a staff medical oncologist of Hospital Sao Jose and the clinical coordinator of Medical Oncology of the Hospital Sao Joaquim from the Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo. Dr. Schutz authored and co-authored several manuscripts in genitourinary oncology.

    View full text