Elsevier

Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Volume 17, August 2014, Pages 87-100
Current Opinion in Pharmacology

Chemical biology approaches to target validation in cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2014.07.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Target validation is especially critical in the context of drugging the cancer genome and clinical drug resistance.

  • We review how chemical biology approaches benefit target validation.

  • We illustrate how critically assessed small molecule chemical inhibitors complement genetic approaches.

  • We highlight recent progress, including reagents for less druggable targets.

Target validation is a crucial element of drug discovery. Especially given the wealth of potential targets emerging from cancer genome sequencing and functional genetic screens, and also considering the time and cost of downstream drug discovery efforts, it is essential to build confidence in a proposed target, ideally using different technical approaches. We argue that complementary biological and chemical biology strategies are essential for robust target validation. We discuss recent progress in the discovery and application of high quality chemical tools and other chemical biology approaches to target validation in cancer. Among other topical examples, we highlight the emergence of designed irreversible chemical tools to study potential target proteins and oncogenic pathways that were hitherto regarded as poorly druggable.

Section snippets

Introduction: setting the scene

Increasing numbers of potential therapeutic targets for cancer are being generated by an exponential growth in genomic information revealing oncogenic driver and dysfunctional tumour-suppressor proteins, coupled with data from other omics analyses, synthetic lethal screens based on RNA interference (RNAi) and classical hypothesis-driven approaches [1, 2, 3, 4, 5••, 6]. Current estimates reveal that approved drugs are available for only 5% of the 500 or so cancer-causing gene products [7••]. As

Recent examples of the value of complementary chemical and biological validation

Several recent studies reinforce the value of complementary chemical and biological approaches to target validation and in key examples demonstrate how different results may be obtained with orthogonal technical approaches. For example, the kinase TNIK was highlighted in elegant work as an essential activator of WNT target genes [30]. The siRNA-mediated depletion of TNIK and overexpression of mutant TNIK kinase abrogated WNT-dependent transcription, suggesting a likely essential function for

Need for high quality chemical tools

Quality chemical tools provide an ideal opportunity to test the therapeutic hypothesis with an agent close to the profile of the desired highly optimised clinical candidate. In our opinion, demonstration of the desired therapeutic phenotype in cellular and in vivo animal models, in the absence of undesirable toxicity, through the use of multiple fit-for-purpose chemical tools provides the most significant boost to confidence in target validation. Unfortunately, there continue to be frequent

Small molecule chemical tools: reversible target modulation

The value of quality small molecule chemical tools to the bioscience community is particularly highlighted by the enabling work of the Structural Genomics Consortium and their network of industrial and academic collaborators whose mission is to further biological understanding, particularly in the field of epigenetics, through the open provision of high quality chemical probes. This very successful initiative has already spawned a wealth of ground-breaking chemical probes and associated

Small molecule chemical tools: irreversible protein modulation

There has been an emergence of chemical tools, suitable for in vivo use in animals, that selectively bind their target protein via covalent modification. This is an attractive approach, particularly for the modulation of hitherto undruggable protein targets. Key advantages include the ability to completely ablate a specific protein function without removing the protein together with the avoidance of challenging pharmacokinetic (PK) optimisation as a result of essentially irreversible

Concluding remarks

There continues to be a major need to expand the drugged — and chemically probed — cancer genome. Attractive targets are those that represent addictions, vulnerabilities and synthetic lethalities in cancer, including those that are not oncogenes per se, as with the molecular chaperone HSP90. Target space can now be further extended with the emerging new evidence of the powerful therapeutic potential of immune modulation in oncology.

Especially given the explosion of potential drug targets from

Conflict of interest

PW and JB are employees of The Institute of Cancer Research, which has a commercial interest in the discovery and development of a range anticancer drugs and operates a rewards to discoverers scheme. PW is a former employee of AstraZeneca and JB is a former employee and shareholder of Pfizer. The authors declare relevant commercial interactions with Yamanouchi (now Astellas), Piramed Pharma (acquired by Roche), Genentech, Vernalis, Novartis, Chroma Therapeutics, Astex Pharmaceuticals,

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

PW and JB are grateful for major core support from Cancer Research [grant number C309/A11566]. PW is a Cancer Research UK Life Fellow [grant number C309/A8992]. The authors acknowledge funding to The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust as a Cancer Research UK Centre and from the National Institute of Health Research to our Biomedical Research Centre. We apologise to the authors of numerous excellent papers that could not be cited because of space constraints.

References (111)

  • L.B. Alexandrov et al.

    Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer

    Nature

    (2013)
  • C. Curtis et al.

    The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups

    Nature

    (2012)
  • C. Kandoth et al.

    Mutational landscape and significance across 12 major cancer types

    Nature

    (2013)
  • B. Vogelstein et al.

    Cancer genome landscapes

    Science

    (2013)
  • P. Workman et al.

    Drugging cancer genomes

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2013)
  • I. Bajrami et al.

    Genome-wide profiling of genetic synthetic lethality identifies CDK12 as a novel determinant of PARP1/2 inhibitor sensitivity

    Cancer Res

    (2014)
  • M.N. Patel et al.

    Objective assessment of cancer genes for drug discovery

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2013)
  • R.A. Burrell et al.

    The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution

    Nature

    (2013)
  • M. Greaves et al.

    Clonal evolution in cancer

    Nature

    (2012)
  • A. Crockford et al.

    Implications of intratumour heterogeneity for treatment stratification

    J Pathol

    (2014)
  • B. Al-Lazikani et al.

    Combinatorial drug therapy for cancer in the post-genomic era

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2012)
  • D.V. Titov et al.

    Identification and validation of protein targets of bioactive small molecules

    Bioorg Med Chem

    (2012)
  • J.A. Lee et al.

    Modern phenotypic drug discovery is a viable, neoclassic pharma strategy

    J Med Chem

    (2012)
  • M.J. Cooper et al.

    Application of multiplexed kinase inhibitor beads to study kinome adaptations in drug-resistant leukemia

    PLOS ONE

    (2013)
  • M.E. Bunnage

    Getting pharmaceutical R&D back on target

    Nat Chem Biol

    (2011)
  • R.M. Plenge et al.

    Validating therapeutic targets through human genetics

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2013)
  • C.G. Begley et al.

    Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research

    Nature

    (2012)
  • F. Prinz et al.

    Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?

    Nat Rev Drug Discov

    (2011)
  • E. Iorns et al.

    The role of SATB1 in breast cancer pathogenesis

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2010)
  • M. Steckel et al.

    Determination of synthetic lethal interactions in KRAS oncogene-dependent cancer cells reveals novel therapeutic targeting strategies

    Cell Res

    (2012)
  • R. Brough et al.

    Functional viability profiles of breast cancer

    Cancer Discov

    (2011)
  • B. Haibe-Kains et al.

    Inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies

    Nature

    (2013)
  • F.S. Collins et al.

    Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility

    Nature

    (2014)
  • M.E. Bunnage et al.

    Target validation using chemical probes

    Nat Chem Biol

    (2013)
  • M. Cortés-Cros et al.

    The path to oncology drug target validation: an industry perspective

    Methods Mol Biol

    (2013)
  • P. Workman

    Auditing the pharmacological accounts for Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: unfolding the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

    Mol Cancer Ther

    (2003)
  • T. Mahmoudi et al.

    The kinase TNIK is an essential activator of Wnt target genes

    EMBO J

    (2009)
  • K.K. Ho et al.

    Discovery of 4-phenyl-2-phenylaminopyridine based TNIK inhibitors

    Bioorg Med Chem Lett

    (2013)
  • C. Babij et al.

    STK33 kinase activity is nonessential in KRAS-dependent cancer cells

    Cancer Res

    (2011)
  • J.R. Smith et al.

    Silencing the cochaperone CDC37 destabilizes kinase clients and sensitizes cancer cells to HSP90 inhibitors

    Oncogene

    (2009)
  • J.R. Smith et al.

    Restricting direct interaction of CDC37 with HSP90 does not compromise chaperoning of client proteins

    Oncogene

    (2013)
  • A.G. Patel et al.

    Failure of iniparib to inhibit poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in vitro

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2012)
  • X. Liu et al.

    Iniparib nonselectively modifies cysteine-containing proteins in tumor cells and is not a bona fide PARP inhibitor

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2012)
  • S.J. Pettitt et al.

    A genetic screen using the PiggyBac transposon in haploid cells identifies Parp1 as a mediator of olaparib toxicity

    PLOS ONE

    (2013)
  • J. Murai et al.

    Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors

    Cancer Res

    (2012)
  • S.V. Frye

    The art of the chemical probe

    Nat Chem Biol

    (2010)
  • P. Workman et al.

    Probing the probes: fitness factors for small molecule tools

    Chem Biol

    (2010)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Characterization of the novel broad-spectrum kinase inhibitor CTx-0294885 as an affinity reagent for mass spectrometry-based kinome profiling

    J Proteome Res

    (2013)
  • M. Bantscheff et al.

    Chemoproteomic approaches to drug target identification and drug profiling

    Bioorg Med Chem

    (2012)
  • Cited by (32)

    • The role of mixed lineage kinase 3 (MLK3) in cancers

      2022, Pharmacology and Therapeutics
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, studies have focused on the MLKs for the development of novel targeted therapeutics. To this end, major targeted therapeutic approaches available are in-vivo knockout mouse models, inhibitors (pharmacological agents), RNA interference, and CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Blagg & Workman, 2014; Jorda et al., 2018; Wang, Gallo, & Conrad, 2013). Although, there are demerits, the aforementioned therapeutic approaches have been commonly used to target specific molecules, such as G-protein coupled receptors and protein kinases (Gotwals, Cameron, Cipolletta, et al., 2017).

    • Advancement of multi-target drug discoveries and promising applications in the field of Alzheimer's disease

      2019, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is a complex, time-consuming and costly process demanding wider expertise. Under controlled laboratory conditions, target validation is achieved mainly by the chemical biology approach, which is reported to be a particularly powerful and versatile method for target validation [82,83]. The most widely used methods in the chemical biology approach for target identification are highlighted below.

    • Changes in cell morphology guide identification of tubulin as the off-target for protein kinase inhibitors

      2018, Pharmacological Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kinase inhibitors targeting tubulin cannot be recognized in the commonly used kinome-wide screens and overall toxicity screens. Identification of off-targets, particularly those that contribute to the desired cellular efficacy, requires detailed, orthogonal and multidisciplinary drug-target validation approach [1,3,4,13]. These extensive studies are usually performed for a limited number of kinase inhibitors.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text