Original article
Comparison of the Effects of Vapocoolant Spray and Topical Anesthetic Cream on Pain During Needle Electromyography in the Medial Gastrocnemius

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effects of a vapocoolant spray and an eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream in reducing pain during needle electromyography examination.

Setting

Physical medicine and rehabilitation department of a university hospital.

Participants

Adults who underwent needle electromyography (N=99) were randomized to 1 of 2 experimental groups or the control group. Two patients dropped out during the study.

Interventions

In the experimental groups, vapocoolant spray or EMLA cream were applied before needle electromyography. In the control group, needle electromyography was performed without pretreatment.

Main Outcome Measures

Intensity of pain associated with needle electromyography was assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction and preference for repeated use were measured using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

VAS score for pain intensity was significantly lower in the spray group (31.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.0–41.7) compared with the control group (52.9; 95% CI, 45.9–60.0; P=.002), whereas there was no significant difference between the EMLA cream group (42.4; 95% CI, 34.2–50.7) and the control group. Patient satisfaction and preference for repeated use were higher in the spray group than the EMLA group.

Conclusions

Vapocoolant spray was more effective than EMLA cream in reducing pain during needle electromyography.

Section snippets

Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients were informed of the study and provided written consent. The study was conducted on patients aged from 19 to 70 years old who had a normative schedule of needle electromyography in the lower extremity at the university hospital's electromyography clinic. The following patients were excluded from the study: those who refused to participate, those who were unable to understand a visual analog scale (VAS) or a Likert scale,

Results

A total of 99 patients were enrolled; 2 patients dropped out. One patient in the control group refused to continue the needle electromyography examination because of intolerable pain. One patient in the spray group was dropped because the electromyography practitioner entered the electromyography room while the spray was being applied. In total, 97 patients completed the study protocol (32 in the control group, 33 in the EMLA cream group, and 32 in the spray group) (fig 1). The groups did not

Discussion

In this study, vapocoolant spray was more effective than EMLA cream in preventing pain during needle electromyography examination. There was higher satisfaction and preference for the vapocoolant spray in the subjects.

During the needle electromyography examination, a needle connected to recording instruments must be inserted into not only the skin but also the muscle. The introduction of a needle through the skin into a muscle is a painful procedure, usually conducted without appropriate

Conclusions

On comparing the analgesic effects of vapocoolant spray and EMLA cream during needle electromyography, we reached the following conclusions: (1) the group that received vapocoolant spray during needle electromyography had significantly lower VAS scores than the control group; and (2) compared with the EMLA cream group, the vapocoolant spray group had a significantly higher level of satisfaction with the pain reduction method used during needle electromyography and a greater willingness to try

Suppliers

  • a.

    Walter Ritter GmbH and Co, Spaldingstraße 110 B, Hamburg, 20097, Germany.

  • b.

    Alpine Biomed, 1501 Industrial Rd, San Carlos, CA 94070.

  • c.

    SPSS Inc, 233 S Wacker Dr, 11th Fl, Chicago, IL 60606.

References (24)

  • K. El-Salem et al.

    Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain

    Muscle Nerve

    (2008)
  • R. Poveda Roda et al.

    Use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in dental practice. A review

    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal

    (2007)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Evaluation of vapocoolant spray effect on pain reduction during digital nerve block: A randomized clinical trial

      2021, American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In a study by Moon et al., it has been shown that Vapocoolant spray can be used effectively and rapidly to reduce pain during needle electromyography [15]. Another study has shown that Vapocoolant spray significantly reduces pain during intravenous cannulation in both adults and children compared to placebo spray or no treatment [6,15]. In their randomized controlled trial, Hijazi et al. have found Vapocoolant spray to be an effective, acceptable, and safe method of pain reduction for venous cannulation [16].

    • Comparison of the Effects of Vapocoolant Spray and Topical Anesthetic Cream on Pain During Intraarticular Injection of the Shoulder: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

      2020, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Adverse effects related to the vapocoolant spray are extremely rare and include alteration of the skin pigmentation and cutaneous sensitization, neither of which was observed in this trial.19 In addition, the vapocoolant spray has the advantages of extremely rapid effect, short application time, increased convenience, and low cost ($0.18 per procedure).19,22 In this trial, the spray group reported significantly greater participant satisfaction and preference for repeated use compared with the placebo group; however, there were no significant differences between the spray and EMLA groups.

    • <sup>18</sup> F-FDG positron emission tomography as a novel diagnostic tool for peripheral nerve injury

      2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Electromyography (EMG) detects abnormal muscle cell membrane potential, which indicates muscle denervation resulting from peripheral nerve injury and has since become a major electrodiagnostic tool (Daube and Rubin, 2009). However, it has several disadvantages, including its invasiveness and associated pain (Moon et al., 2013); moreover, it takes time for the nerve or muscle below the area damaged by peripheral nerve injury to display abnormalities (Buchthal and Rosenfalck, 1966). For example, in plexus injury, abnormal spontaneous activities (ASA) on EMG occur within 1 to 6 weeks after injury, depending on the distance between the injury site and the muscle fiber (Amato and Dumitru, 2002).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on the authors or on any organization with which the authors are associated.

    Clinical Trial No.: NCT01606046.

    View full text