Coronary artery diseaseDiagnostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring in Low-Intermediate Risk Patients Evaluated in the Emergency Department for Acute Coronary Syndrome
Section snippets
Methods
From March 2007 to January 2009, all consecutive patients who were evaluated in the ED for suspected ACS with nondiagnostic electrocardiographic findings and negative initial cardiac troponin and subsequently underwent CCTA and coronary artery calcium scoring were retrospectively studied. Exclusion criteria included known significant coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as coronary artery stenosis ≥50% and/or previous coronary revascularization. Troponin I was considered negative when <0.5
Results
From March 2007 to January 2009, 247 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with suspected ACS underwent CCTA. Of them, 22 patients did not have calcium score scans performed, because of histories of coronary revascularization or young age (<30 years). Therefore, the final cohort consisted of 225 patients. Study population characteristics are listed in Table 1. The prevalence of significant CAD was 9% and increased along with higher pretest probability and higher TIMI risk score (Figure 2).
Discussion
The main finding of our study is that a CACS of 0 demonstrated a high negative predictive value to exclude significant CAD in low- to intermediate-risk patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain and provided additional diagnostic value over CAD risk factors. The negative predictive value and the sensitivity of a CACS of 0 to exclude significant CAD in our study population were high (99% and 91%, respectively). Indeed, only 2 patients with absence of calcification had moderate lesions
References (28)
- et al.
Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1990) - et al.
Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis
J Am Coll Cardiol
(1997) - et al.
Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2007) - et al.
The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2010) - et al.
Screening patients with chest pain in the emergency department using electron beam tomography: a follow-up study
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2001) - et al.
Noninvasive evaluation with multislice computed tomography in suspected acute coronary syndrome: plaque morphology on multislice computed tomography versus coronary calcium score
J Am Coll Cardiol
(2008) - et al.
Utility of electron beam computed tomography to stratify patients presenting to the emergency room with chest pain
Am J Cardiol
(1999) - et al.
Coronary artery calcium scoring in the emergency department: identifying which patients with chest pain can be safely discharged home
Ann Emerg Med
(2010) - et al.
Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
(2009) - et al.
Electron beam computed tomographic coronary calcium scanning: a review and guidelines for use in asymptomatic persons
Mayo Clin Proc
(1999)
Prevalence and extent of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients with zero or low calcium score undergoing 64-slice cardiac multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of a chest pain syndrome
Am J Cardiol
A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain
J Am Coll Cardiol
Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial
J Am Coll Cardiol
Use of electron-beam computed tomography in the evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department
Ann Emerg Med
Cited by (39)
The Prognostic Value of CAC Zero Among Individuals Presenting With Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis
2022, JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingCoronary Calcium to Rule Out Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Acute Chest Pain
2022, JACC: Cardiovascular ImagingCitation Excerpt :Studies have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of CAC testing to rule out obstructive CAD on CCTA among low- to intermediate-risk patients in the ED. Among these studies, the prevalence of patients without any CAC ranged from 36% to 75%, and the prevalence of obstructive CAD among those with CAC = 0 ranged from 1.8% to 5.2% (10,11). Additionally, CAC testing ruled out obstructive CAD with a sensitivity of 91% to 100% and an NPV of 94% to 100%.
Geographic and Individual Correlates of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in an Asymptomatic Rural Appalachian Population
2018, American Journal of the Medical SciencesCitation Excerpt :Perhaps, CAC screening can be incorporated in CV healthcare in such a high CVD prevalence environment, given that presence of calcification in coronary arteries is a quantifiable marker for coronary atherosclerosis and a measure of plaque burden,46,61-63 CAC is associated with the traditional CVD risk factors,64-71 and CAC improves CV risk prediction when added to traditional risk factors.6,72 Moreover, the expert consensus is that CAC screening is appropriate for individuals at intermediate risk on traditional risk assessment tools1,61,67,73,74 such as those in Central Appalachia where significant proportion of the population has more than 1 CVD risk factor.42 With the high prevalence of subclinical atherosclerosis among asymptomatic individuals, the key issue was identifying predisposition factors.
The evolving purpose of imaging for low risk patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes
2017, International Journal of CardiologyCoronary artery calcium scoring for ruling-out acute coronary syndrome in chest pain CT
2017, American Journal of Emergency MedicineExercise echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography for the evaluation of acute chest pain
2015, Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
This work was partially supported by Instituto de Formacion e Investigacion “Marques de Valdecilla,” Santander, Spain (PostMIR Wenceslao Lopez Albo grant to Dr. Fernandez-Friera), the Spanish Society of Cardiology (postresidency grant to Drs. Fernandez-Friera and Garcia-Alvarez), and Centro Nacional de Investigacion Cardiovascular, Madrid, Spain (Drs. Garcia-Alvarez and Mirelis).