Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 76, 30 September 2014, Pages 2-20
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

New radiotracers for imaging of vascular targets in angiogenesis-related diseases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.07.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Tremendous advances over the last several decades in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allow for targeted imaging of molecular and cellular events in the living systems. Angiogenesis, a multistep process regulated by the network of different angiogenic factors, has attracted world-wide interests, due to its pivotal role in the formation and progression of different diseases including cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and inflammation. In this review article, we will summarize the recent progress in PET or SPECT imaging of a wide variety of vascular targets in three major angiogenesis-related diseases: cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and inflammation. Faster drug development and patient stratification for a specific therapy will become possible with the facilitation of PET or SPECT imaging and it will be critical for the maximum benefit of patients.

Introduction

Angiogenesis is critical for various growth and development relevant events including embryogenesis, tissue remodeling, and wound healing [1]. The sophisticated process is usually regulated in a spatial and temporal manner via active interactions between angiogenic factors, extracellular matrix (ECM) components, and various types of cells. Imbalanced angiogenesis will lead to angiogenic disorders and destructive process of diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases (CVD, e.g. atherosclerosis), inflammation, and tumor growth/metastasis [2].

The pivotal process of angiogenesis can be divided into multiple stages. At the initial stage, the angiogenic stimuli activate the endothelial cells (ECs, the essential building blocks of all vessels) by enhancing their permeability and proliferation, resulting in new capillary sprout elongation [3]. The following stage involves the degradation of membrane matrix components to promote the invasion of ECs into the stroma from the proximal tissue [4], where matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are of critical importance. After the migration of ECs, the buildup of lumen is confirmed with the formation of multicellular vessel sprout. The final stage of angiogenesis is the stabilization of newly formed capillary. Disruption of angiogenesis is a critical factor of many pathological disorders, such as insufficient vascular density observed in myocardial or limb ischemia [5], [6] or irregular vascular growth and abnormal remodeling in primarily tumor [7] development.

In normal conditions, angiogenesis and inflammation are collaborators in tissue repair and remodeling following tissue damage or destructive process of disease. In contrast, a detrimental relationship between angiogenesis and inflammation can result in diseases like asthma, atherosclerosis, diabetes, abdominal aortic aneurysm, inflammatory bowel diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Acute inflammation usually triggers a protective defense against the “intruders”, which involves rapid recruitment and activation of various immune/inflammatory cells to fight against pathogens [13], [14]. On the other hand, chronic inflammation can cause substantial tissue damage which might facilitate carcinogenicity [15], where pathological angiogenesis (i.e. angiogenesis process under pathological states, e.g. tumorigenesis and inflammation) promotes a continuous recruitment of inflammatory cells, exacerbating inflammation and damage [16]. A number of inflammatory cells (e.g. neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs)) are involved in inducing and promoting angiogenesis. Under hypoxia condition, these inflammatory cells can secrete a plethora of angiogenesis-boosting molecules, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and various cytokines, resulting in enhanced vascular permeability and additional recruitment of immune cells. Multiple types of leukocytes and macrophages are also involved in the proteolytic remodeling of the ECM by releasing different types of proteases (MMPs, cathepsins, plasminogen, urokinase etc.) to stimulate blood vessel formation. Activation of these inflammatory cells will also lead to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), important stimuli of angiogenesis.

The interactions between these constituents result in an intricate and heterogeneous complex of cells and matrix in the pathological angiogenesis. To explore the mechanisms of angiogenesis in molecular level and identify potential targets for disease therapy/prevention, precise knowledge about the role/network of these molecules (e.g. pro- or anti-angiogenic factors, vascular targets) inside the angiogenic cascades will be extremely beneficial.

With an aim to demonstrate the pros and cons of the different vascular targets (Scheme 1 and Table 1) in the diagnosis and therapy of various diseases, herein we will summarize newly developed radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging of these vascular targets in three major angiogenesis-related diseases (i.e. cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and inflammation). Future research directions in the field of molecular imaging of angiogenesis will also be discussed.

Section snippets

Vascular targets of pathological angiogenesis

The vascular targets of pathological angiogenesis can be categorized into three major types: (1) targets on the ECs, (2) targets on non-ECs (i.e. monocytes, macrophages, and stem cells etc.), and (3) ECM proteins and proteases [17]. Numerous studies have been performed to identify the roles in angiogenesis of various molecule families including VEGFs and their receptors (VEGFRs) [18], [19], Tie receptors [20], integrins [21], other growth factor receptors [22], [23], [24], as well as various

Molecular imaging modalities: PET vs SPECT

With the support of different radionuclides, SPECT and PET are molecular imaging techniques that enable expression profile evaluation of molecular targets within a living subject. Both techniques have deep signal penetration and demonstrate high sensitivity in imaging of molecular targets/processes; hence they have been routinely used in the clinic for more than a decade [42]. The spatial resolution of PET or SPECT is not as high as CT or MRI (which has sub-millimeter resolution) [43]. However,

PET or SPECT imaging of vascular targets in cardiovascular diseases (CVD)

Cardiovascular diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality world-wide. Even though efficient treatments have been developed for specific patient groups, significant amount of cardiovascular diseases are still challenging to treat especially in elderly patients [194]. The maturation of PET or SPECT imaging for different vascular targets will yield new insights into the pathophysiological changes underlying these cardiovascular diseases, which will be discussed below.

PET or SPECT imaging of vascular targets in inflammation

Imaging of inflammation has been quite challenging in the past. Despite the fact that FDG is well known to be taken up in inflammation, more agents are needed due to its low specificity for inflammation detection [220], and till date the quest to find optimal imaging agents is still ongoing [221]. PET or SPECT imaging of various vascular targets that are involved in inflammation can pave the way to this ultimate goal. Even though 18F-FDG, the most widely-used PET tracer in clinic, is well-known

Conclusion and future perspectives

Different imaging techniques have been applied for collecting structural, functional and molecular information inside tissue vasculature from pathological angiogenesis, many of which have served as indispensable tools in anti-angiogenic drug evaluation. Due to the high sensitivity and high tissue penetration capacity, PET or SPECT will probably provide the highest clinical relevance in this aspect for widespread use in future clinical scenarios [17], [39], [49]. Moreover, the toxicity concerns

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for financial support from the University of Wisconsin — Madison (Graduate School Grant 135-PRJ68QC and Radiology R&D 1211-001), the National Institutes of Health (NIBIB/NCI 1R01CA169365 and P30CA014520), the Department of Defense (W81XWH-11-1-0644), and the American Cancer Society (125246-RSG-13-099-01-CCE).

References (247)

  • M. Eder et al.

    ScVEGF–PEG–HBED–CC and scVEGF–PEG–NOTA conjugates: comparison of easy-to-label recombinant proteins for [68Ga]PET imaging of VEGF receptors in angiogenic vasculature

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2010)
  • M.G. Scheer et al.

    Imaging liver metastases of colorectal cancer patients with radiolabelled bevacizumab: lack of correlation with VEGF-A expression

    Eur. J. Cancer

    (2008)
  • O. Ilovich et al.

    Labeled 3-aryl-4-indolylmaleimide derivatives and their potential as angiogenic PET biomarkers

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2010)
  • O. Ilovich et al.

    Formation of fluorine-18 labeled diaryl ureas-labeled VEGFR-2/PDGFR dual inhibitors as molecular imaging agents for angiogenesis

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (2008)
  • M. Jiang et al.

    Comparison of two cross-bridged macrocyclic chelators for the evaluation of 64Cu-labeled-LLP2A, a peptidomimetic ligand targeting VLA-4-positive tumors

    Nucl. Med. Biol.

    (2013)
  • J.M. Rubatt et al.

    Independent prognostic relevance of microvessel density in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer and associations between CD31, CD105, p53 status, and angiogenic marker expression: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

    Gynecol. Oncol.

    (2009)
  • A.W. Griffioen et al.

    Angiogenesis: potentials for pharmacologic intervention in the treatment of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and chronic inflammation

    Pharmacol. Rev.

    (2000)
  • S. Goel et al.

    Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2011)
  • M.S. Pepper

    Role of the matrix metalloproteinase and plasminogen activator–plasmin systems in angiogenesis

    Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.

    (2001)
  • S.A. Siefert et al.

    Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular physiology and disease

    Vascular

    (2012)
  • S. Mitsos et al.

    Therapeutic angiogenesis for myocardial ischemia revisited: basic biological concepts and focus on latest clinical trials

    Angiogenesis

    (2012)
  • B.H. Annex

    Therapeutic angiogenesis for critical limb ischaemia

    Nat. Rev. Cardiol.

    (2013)
  • G. Bergers et al.

    Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch

    Nat. Rev. Cancer

    (2003)
  • J.C. Sluimer et al.

    Novel concepts in atherogenesis: angiogenesis and hypoxia in atherosclerosis

    J. Pathol.

    (2009)
  • Z. Szekanecz et al.

    Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in rheumatoid arthritis

    Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.

    (2010)
  • B. Vijaynagar et al.

    Potential role for anti-angiogenic therapy in abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Eur. J. Clin. Investig.

    (2013)
  • B.J. Rabquer et al.

    Angiogenesis and vasculopathy in systemic sclerosis: evolving concepts

    Curr. Rheumatol. Rep.

    (2012)
  • D.M. Noonan et al.

    Inflammation, inflammatory cells and angiogenesis: decisions and indecisions

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2008)
  • Y.W. Kim et al.

    Inflammation and oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease

    J. Mol. Med. (Berl.)

    (2013)
  • C. Costa et al.

    Angiogenesis and chronic inflammation: cause or consequence?

    Angiogenesis

    (2007)
  • M.R. Stacy et al.

    Targeted molecular imaging of angiogenesis in PET and SPECT: a review

    Yale J. Biol. Med.

    (2012)
  • N. Ferrara

    Vascular endothelial growth factor: basic science and clinical progress

    Endocr. Rev.

    (2004)
  • A.K. Olsson et al.

    VEGF receptor signalling — in control of vascular function

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2006)
  • M. Barczyk et al.

    Integrins

    Cell Tissue Res.

    (2010)
  • L.C. Harshman et al.

    Targeting the hepatocyte growth factor/c-Met signaling pathway in renal cell carcinoma

    Cancer J.

    (2013)
  • C.H. Heldin

    Targeting the PDGF signaling pathway in tumor treatment

    Cell Commun. Signal.

    (2013)
  • J. Welti et al.

    Recent molecular discoveries in angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapies in cancer

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2013)
  • D. Ribatti et al.

    Tumor endothelial markers as a target in cancer

    Expert Opin. Ther. Targets

    (2012)
  • D.R. Principe et al.

    TGF-beta: duality of function between tumor prevention and carcinogenesis

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (2014)
  • J. Folkman

    Angiogenesis: an organizing principle for drug discovery?

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2007)
  • A. Bonauer et al.

    Vascular microRNAs

    Curr. Drug Targets

    (2010)
  • Y. Crawford et al.

    VEGF inhibition: insights from preclinical and clinical studies

    Cell Tissue Res.

    (2009)
  • Z. Eroglu et al.

    Targeting angiopoietin-2 signaling in cancer therapy

    Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs

    (2013)
  • M. Jeltsch et al.

    Receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated angiogenesis

    Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.

    (2013)
  • C. Scaringi et al.

    Integrin inhibitor cilengitide for the treatment of glioblastoma: a brief overview of current clinical results

    Anticancer Res.

    (2012)
  • J.M. Ebos et al.

    Antiangiogenic therapy: impact on invasion, disease progression, and metastasis

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2011)
  • D.A. Mankoff

    A definition of molecular imaging

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2007)
  • M.L. James et al.

    A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2012)
  • W. Cai et al.

    Multimodality molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2008)
  • L. Zhu et al.

    Preclinical molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis

    Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging

    (2010)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Coordination polymers nanoparticles for bioimaging

      2021, Coordination Chemistry Reviews
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on “Targeted Imaging”.

    1

    Hao Hong and Feng Chen contributed equally to this work.

    View full text