Elsevier

The Lancet Oncology

Volume 6, Issue 7, July 2005, Pages 520-528
The Lancet Oncology

Review
New insights on cell death from radiation exposure

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70246-1Get rights and content

Summary

Ionising radiation has been an important part of cancer treatment for almost a century, being used in external-beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and targeted radionuclide therapy. At the molecular and cellular level, cell killing has been attributed to deposition of energy from the radiation in the DNA within the nucleus, with production of DNA double-strand breaks playing a central part. However, this DNA-centric model has been questioned because cell-death pathways, in which direct relations between cell killing and DNA damage diverge, have been reported. These pathways include membrane-dependent signalling pathways and bystander responses (when cells respond not to direct radiation exposure but to the irradiation of their neighbouring cells). New insights into mechanisms of these responses coupled with technological advances in targeting of cells in experimental systems with microbeams have led to a reassessment of the model of how cells are killed by ionising radiation. This review provides an update on these mechanisms.

Introduction

Radiotherapy is based on the idea that exposure to a sufficient quantity (dose) of ionising radiation kills or sterilises cells. The first clinical use of radiation for the treatment of tumours was recorded in 1897, and during the past 50 years the specialty of radiation biology has led to the development of ideas that form a mechanistic framework of the predicted pathways between energy deposition in a tumour cell and probability of cell survival.1 Fundamental to this mechanism has been the dogma that initial damage to the DNA within a cell nucleus is central to the killing of a cell by reproductive cell death. This idea has resulted in much investigation of how cells prevent perpetuation of damage to their DNA by a complex series of pathways, to recognise and repair DNA damage.

Despite the wealth of information on DNA-damage-mediated mechanisms of cell killing by ionising radiation, a new framework is now emerging. During the past 10 years, there has been a shift away from a totally DNA-centric approach to include models that invoke complex signalling pathways in cells and between cells within tissues (figure 1). Several newly recognised responses have been classified as so-called non-targeted responses,2 in which biological effects are not directly related to the amount of energy deposited in the DNA of the cells traversed by the radiation. The effects include signalling pathways that are not dependent on DNA damage, bystander responses,3 adaptive responses,4 low-dose hypersensitivity,5 genomic instability,3 and the inverse dose-rate effect.6 A common feature is that most of these responses manifest themselves after exposure to low doses of radiation (<0·5 Gy) or in conditions when cells have not been exposed uniformly or irradiated directly. Given findings that the patterns of gene expression after radiation exposure are highly dose dependent, with different patterns of genes expressed after low doses from those expressed after high doses,7 many of the non-targeted responses could be a consequence of differential gene expression, cell signalling, or epigenetic responses predominating at low doses.

The aims of this review are to reassess some of these findings on mechanisms of cell killing and to put them into a clinical context. The delivery of radiation in a clinical setting is rapidly changing with the advent of approaches such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, proton and heavy-ion treatment, improved imaging, and new combinations of radiation with chemoagents.8 New insights into mechanisms of radiation effects in tumours and healthy tissues need to be coupled to these other advances to maximise future therapeutic benefit.

Section snippets

Cell killing

Ionising radiation is an effective DNA-damaging agent, producing a range of lesions in cellular DNA, including over 20 types of base damage, single-strand breaks, double-strand breaks, and DNA–DNA and DNA–protein crosslinks. DNA double-strand breaks have long been thought to be the most important for cell killing, with about 40 double-strand breaks induced per 1 Gy in a typical cell.9 Although cells have two complex repair mechanisms for dealing with double-strand breaks,10 many are not

Conclusions

Radiation biology is undergoing rapid change, with advances in molecular, cellular, and tissue biology and new technological approaches such as the use of microbeams. Our understanding of the mechanisms of cell death, which is the main driver of tumour therapy, has undergone a change from a view locked into the notion of direct DNA damage and repair to one that encompasses the important intracellular and intercellular signalling pathways present at the cell and tissue level. The findings of new

Search strategy and selection criteria

Referenced papers were identified through searches of MEDLINE from 1992 onwards. Search terms included “radiation”, “bystander”, “apoptosis”, and “cell death”. Because of the large number of references we have given, only selected examples, published in English, that are important or highlight further reading are listed.

References (89)

  • VV Moiseenko et al.

    In-field and out-of-field effects in partial volume lung irradiation in rodents: possible correlation between early DNA damage and functional endpoints

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2000)
  • GW Morgan et al.

    Radiation and the lung: a reevaluation of the mechanisms mediating pulmonary injury

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (1995)
  • EJ Hall et al.

    Radiation-induced second cancers: the impact of 3D-CRT and IMRT

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

    (2003)
  • EJ Hall

    Radiobiology for the radiologist

    (2000)
  • WF Morgan

    Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I, radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro

    Radiat Res

    (2003)
  • S Wolff

    The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications

    Environ Health Perspect

    (1998)
  • RC Miller et al.

    The inverse dose-rate effect for oncogenic transformation by charged particles is dependent on linear energy transfer

    Radiat Res

    (1993)
  • SA Amundson et al.

    Differential responses of stress genes to low dose-rate gamma irradiation

    Mol Cancer Res

    (2003)
  • J Bernier et al.

    Radiation oncology: a century of achievements

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2004)
  • JF Ward

    Nature of lesions formed by ionising radiation

  • SP Jackson

    Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks

    Carcinogenesis

    (2002)
  • M Lobrich et al.

    Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific. Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1995)
  • L-C Huang et al.

    Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1996)
  • CB Bennett et al.

    Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand breaks in a dispensible yeast plasmid

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1993)
  • JS Bedford et al.

    Radiation Research Society. 1952–2002. Historical and current highlights in radiation biology: has anything important been learned by irradiating cells?

    Radiat Res

    (2002)
  • DT Goodhead

    Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage to DNA

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1994)
  • M de Gulston et al.

    Processing of clustered DNA damage generates additional double-strand breaks in mammalian cells post-irradiation

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2004)
  • BM Sutherland et al.

    Clustered DNA damages induced by x rays in human cells

    Radiat Res

    (2002)
  • L Harrison et al.

    Multiply damaged sites in DNA: interactions with Escherichia coli endonucleases III and VIII

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (1998)
  • CG Pearson et al.

    Enhanced mutagenic potential of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine when present within a clustered DNA damage site

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2004)
  • AR Clarke et al.

    Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways

    Nature

    (1993)
  • A Haimovitz-Friedman et al.

    Ionizing radiation acts on cellular membranes to generate ceramide and initiate apoptosis

    J Exp Med

    (1994)
  • IR Radford et al.

    Importance of DNA damage in the induction of apoptosis by ionizing radiation: effect of the scid mutation and DNA ploidy on the radiosensitivity of murine lymphoid cell lines

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1999)
  • R Kolesnick et al.

    Radiation and ceramide-induced apoptosis

    Oncogene

    (2003)
  • KD Held

    Radiation-induced apoptosis and its relationship to loss of clonogenic survival

    Apoptosis

    (1997)
  • CA Vidair et al.

    Apoptosis induced by X-irradiation of rec-myc cells is postmitotic and not predicted by the time after irradiation or behavior of sister cells

    Cancer Res

    (1996)
  • T Alper

    Lethal mutations and cell death

    Phys Med Biol

    (1963)
  • T Alper

    Cellular radiobiology

    (1979)
  • KM Prise et al.

    The use of microbeams in radiation biology: an overview

  • LA Braby

    Microbeam studies of the sensitivity of structures within living cells

    Scanning Microsc

    (1992)
  • M Folkard et al.

    A charged-particle microbeam: I, development of an experimental system for targeting cells individually with counted particles

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1997)
  • G Randers-Pehrson et al.

    The Columbia University single-ion microbeam

    Radiat Res

    (2001)
  • M Folkard et al.

    A charged particle microbeam: II, a single-particle micro-collimation and detection system

    Int J Radiat Biol

    (1997)
  • RC Miller et al.

    The oncogenic transforming potential of the passage of single alpha particles through mammalian cell nuclei

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1999)
  • Cited by (304)

    • Electrostatic focusing lens system for low MeV-ion microprobe: A simulation and optimization study

      2022, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particle microbeam irradiation [13–21], charged particles, at several to a few hundred MeV range, are focused into a sub-micron beam spot such that the cellular or subcellular matrix can be irradiated in a finely-controlled way. Combined with a fluorescence microscopic system, various important intra-cellular radiation-induced processes, for example, the spatiotemporal evolution of DNA damage repair [22], bystander effect [23–25], intra- and inter- cellular signaling [26], etc., were able to be probed. However, more efforts are required to fully understand the combined radiobiological effects under a broad radiation spectrum or to elucidate the reaction process in greater details.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text