Elsevier

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume 6, Issue 3, May–June 1999, Pages 278-285
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Original article
Comparison of Tc-99m sestamibi and TI-201 gated perfusion SPECT

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-3581(99)90040-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. To determine the interpretability of gated thallium-201 perfusion SPECT compared with that performed by use of technetium-99m sestamibi (MIBI), 33 patients with prior myocardial infarction were studied. Patients received 22 to 30 mCi (814 to 1110 MBq) MIBI at peak stress, and a 15-minute gated SPECT acquisition was begun 30 to 40 minutes thereafter. On a subsequent day gated TI-201 SPECT was acquired for 15 minutes, 4 hours after a resting 3.5 mCi (130 MBq) injection. SPECT was performed over a 180-degree arc by use of a 90-degree angled 2-detector camera.

Results. Gated studies were interpreted independently by 4 experienced physicians. Study quality was graded (0 = uninterpretable to 4 = excellent). Wall motion (0 = normal to 2 = akinetic/dyskinetic) and wall thickening (0 = normal to 2 = absent) were graded for each of 10 segments viewed in orthogonal planes. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was calculated by use of software thus far validated only for MIBI. The average count density of mid-ventricular end-diastolic short axis tomograms with sestamibi was 3.47 times greater than with thallium. Mean study quality was 3.4 for MIBI and 1.8 for thallium (P < 10p−6). No gated MIBI SPECTs, but 2 gated thallium studies (6%) were judged uninterpretable. Among interpretable scans, interobserver agreement (Kendall statistic) in assessing wall motion was 0.73 for MIBI and 0.66 for thallium (P = .01). For assessing wall thickening, the Kendall statistic was 0.73 for MIBI and 0.69 for thallium (P = .05). Correlation (r) of LVEFs was 0.91, SEE = 6.4.

Conclusions. We conclude that gated thallium SPECT is inferior to MIBI because of much poorer image quality and somewhat poorer interobserver agreement among experienced physicians. However, LVEF can be determined reliably from gated thallium SPECT.

References (8)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (48)

  • Thallium-201 gated single-photon emission tomography for assessing left ventricular volumes and function in patients with aortic valve stenosis: Comparison with echocardiography as the reference standard

    2014, IJC Heart and Vasculature
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the current study, we demonstrated the following: 1) patients with AS had a larger LVM index and a larger EDV compared to control subjects; 2) there were good correlations in EDV and ESV between echocardiography and QGS even in patients with AS and 3) there was a good correlation in EF between the 2 methods even in patients with AS, but Bland–Altman plot for EF showed a negative proportional error. Compared to technetium-99m (Tc-99m)-labeled agents, Tl-201 is considered to possess poor image quality due to its lower photon energy [13]. However, recent development of myocardial collimeters and its better physiological properties have resulted in a renewed interest in the use of Tl-201 for gated SPECT.

  • Use of multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function

    2009, Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography
    Citation Excerpt :

    Despite the validation of electrocardiographic (ECG)–gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and its automated software analysis packages against other imaging methods,23–26 the accuracy of SPECT can be hampered when severe perfusion defects or attenuation artifacts are present, as well as in patients with small or large hearts.27 Moreover, higher variability in measurements were observed with Tl-201 compared with Tc-99m radioisotopes28,29 and between any pair of software algorithms.30 The ability of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to combine adequate tissue-blood pool contrast with excellent spatial and temporal resolution in one study, free from geometric assumptions and exposure of the patient to ionizing radiation, was instrumental to its high degree of accuracy and reproducibility in numerous reports.31–33

  • Nuclear Cardiology: Present and Future

    2006, Current Problems in Cardiology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text