Elsevier

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volume 3, Issue 3, May–June 1996, Pages 204-211
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Original article
Comparison between dipyridamole and adenosine as pharmacologic coronary vasodilators in detection of coronary artery disease with thallium 201 imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-3581(96)90034-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Both dipyridamole and adenosine are widely used as pharmacologic stressors with 201Tl imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. The purpose of this study was to compare dipyridamole and adenosine 201Tl imaging directly in patients with angiographically proved coronary artery disease.

Methods and Results. Fifty-four patients were submitted to two planar 201Tl studies: one with dipyridamole and the other with adenosine. The interval between the two studies varied from 2 to 7 days and the order was assigned randomly. Three standard planar views were obtained 10 minutes and 4 hours after the injection of 3.0 mCi 201Tl. Administration of dipyridamole was as follows: 0.142 mg/kg/min during 4 minutes, followed by a slight exercise and 201Tl injection. The infusion of adenosine was as follows: 0.140 mg/kg/min during 6 minutes with injection of 201Tl after the third minute of infusion. Patients were asked to give their preference considering the number, type, severity, and duration of side effects on a scale from 0 (worst) to 5 (best). Reading was done by two experienced observers. The heart was divided into three segments per view. The change in systolic blood pressure was −12 ± 11 mm Hg for adenosine and −5 ± 10 mm Hg for dipyridamole (p < 0.001), and the change in heart rate was 18 ± 10 beats/min for adenosine and 8 ± 7 beats/min for dipyridamole (p < 0.001). With regions of interest, ischemic/normal wall ratios were determined: 0.78 ± 0.06 for adenosine and 0.83 ± 0.08 for dipyridamole (p < 0.001). Adenosine detected 295 normal, 170 ischemic, and 21 scar segments, whereas dipyridamole detected 326, 135, and 25 segments, respectively. Patients preferred adenosine (4.3 ± 1.0 for adenosine vs 3.8 ± 1.5 for dipyridamole; p < 0.04) mainly because of the short duration of side effects.

Conclusion. This study shows that the use of adenosine with 201Tl imaging may have some advantages over dipyridamole.

References (32)

Cited by (48)

  • Coronary Artery Disease Detection: Pharmacologic Stress SPECT. Pharmacologic Stress SPECT.

    2010, Clinical Nuclear Cardiology: State of the Art and Future Directions
  • Direct comparison of adenosine and adenosine 5′-triphosphate as pharmacologic stress agents in conjunction with Tl-201 SPECT: Hemodynamic response, myocardial tracer uptake, and size of perfusion defects in the same subjects

    2006, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although ATP has a greater initial action, adenosine as the metabolic product of ATP then plays a role in maintaining vasodilation.18 As such, when 2 pharmacologic stress agents with similar effects and indications, such as adenosine and ATP, are available for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease, a comparison of the diagnostic accuracy, technical feasibility, incidence of side effects, and cost is important for routine clinical application.4 The overall sensitivity and specificity of Tl-201 SPECT imaging with ATP for coronary artery disease detection are 84% to 92% and 87% to 89%, respectively, which are similar to those reported with adenosine or dipyridamole.19-21

  • Effect of Caffeine on Ischemia Detection by Adenosine Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging

    2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This is an important difference because caffeine is a competitive inhibitor, which means that the very high adenosine interstitial concentration may overwhelm the receptors and continue to produce coronary hyperemia. This difference between adenosine and dipyridamole is seen as a more robust blood pressure decrease and heart rate increase and more defect severity and extent with adenosine compared with dipyridamole (26–28). Further, even if the degree of hyperemia is slightly reduced, it may have no important impact on the results of perfusion imaging because the tracer extraction levels off at flow rates above 2.5-fold of the baseline flow.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text