A PET-MRI registration technique for PET studies of the rat brain1,

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-8051(99)00098-0Get rights and content

Introduction

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful imaging technique to provide information regarding brain functions of humans and laboratory animals. PET studies of oncology, pharmacology, and physiology have been conducted on nonhuman primates, dogs, and cats 1, 7, 23, 25. PET has an advantage of being able to follow the time course or to measure a response to perturbations on the same individual.

With a recent improvement in the spatial resolution of the PET camera (20), the PET technique has been applied to studies of pharmacokinetics and receptor function in the rat brain 5, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 18, 27, 28. Rat PET studies are of great value, because a variety of disease models and genetic abnormalities have been developed for rats. However, due to limited spatial resolution, little morphologic information can be obtained for the rat brain from the PET images alone. The ability to image brain functions is substantially enhanced if functional images presented by PET are contrasted with underlying morphologic information visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Although previous investigators have used MRI as a morphologic reference 16, 18, they have only attempted to acquire corresponding slices for PET and MRI using a head holder or fiducial markers. No reports of a registration procedure have been made that post-process and reslice the images to obtain the same section so that PET and MRI could be superimposed.

Registration of brain PET to MRI with image superimposition has proven useful in human brain studies 2, 4, 20, 21, 22. The registration technique is based on the fact that the PET images contain some imperfect information about localization of the brain contour and major intracerebral structures, because typical tracers such as [18F]2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) and [15O]water ([15O]H2O) accumulate more in the brain parenchyma than outside of the brain and more in the gray matter than in the white matter. Such morphologic information is not sufficient to locate every detailed brain region by itself, but is instrumental in matching the PET to MRI either by inspection or by computation. In the case of rat imaging, however, we found that [18F]FDG-PET images provide little morphologic information because of the rat’s extremely small brain size, smaller volume ratio for white matter and ventricles to gray matter, and high radioactivity in glands, muscles, and other extracranial tissues. We also found that the rat PET images with the benzodiazepine receptor ligand [11C]flumazenil ([11C]FMZ) provides the brain contour because of a higher accumulation of [11C]FMZ in the cerebral cortex than in the central gray matters and outside the brain.

In the present study, we undertook registration of [11C]FMZ-PET images of the rat brain to MRI using the method of Ardekani et al. (2) with slight modifications. We applied the technique to rats in which dopamine receptor degeneration was induced by the unilaterally quinolinic acid (QA) injection. We examined whether the striatal PET images with the dopamine D1 receptor ligand [11C]SCH 23390 ([11C]SCH) or the D2 ligand [11C]raclopride ([11C]RAC) acquired in the same position matched the anatomical structure visualized by MRI. Recently, Shimada (24) has applied the PET-MRI registration technique to cat brain imaging.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

[11C]FMZ (11), [11C]RAC (13), and [11C]SCH (6) were prepared by 11C-methylation of the respective desmethyl compound with 11C-methyl iodide.

Results

Figure 1 shows the images of [11C]FMZ-PET (Fig. 1A) that have been registered to the MRI and the T2-weighted MRI (Fig. 1B) of the same individual normal rat. An ex vivo ARG with [11C]FMZ (Fig. 1C) of another normal rat brain is shown for comparison. Ex vivo ARG clearly represented that [11C]FMZ accumulated in the cerebral cortex, but not much in the striatum or cerebellum. [11C]FMZ-PET indicated little accumulation outside the brain and roughly delineated the brain contour, but it alone did

Discussion

In the present study, we have applied the PET-MRI registration technique developed by Ardekani et al. (2) to rat brain imaging with slight modifications. This algorithm, when applied to human brain images, does not need scalping but needs an additional step of MRI segmentation. Recently, Shimada (24) attempted a PET-MRI registration of the cat brain using two methods that had been developed for human brain imaging. He found that the Senda method, which utilized a two-step manual matching (22),

Acknowledgements

We deeply appreciate Dr. B. A. Ardekani for his valuable discussion and for providing the software for PET-MRI registration, which was appropriately modified for the rat PET.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (29)

  • S.R. Cherry et al.

    MicroPETA high resolution PET scanner for imaging small animals

    IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.

    (1997)
  • R. Dann et al.

    Evaluation of elastic matching system for anatomic (CT, MR) and functional (PET) cerebral images

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1989)
  • W.-D. Heiss et al.

    Dynamic penumbra demonstrated by sequential multitracer PET after middle cerebral artery occlusion in cats

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (1994)
  • K. Ishiwata et al.

    Metabolite analysis of [11C]flumazenil in human plasmaAssessment as the standardized value for quantitative PET studies

    Ann. Nucl. Med.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (35)

    • Quantification of dopamine D<inf>2/3</inf> receptors in rat brain using factor analysis corrected [<sup>18</sup>F]Fallypride images

      2012, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several methods are available to correct images for skull and gland radioactivity spillover. One approach is a partial volume correction (PVC) method based on anatomical information from MRI (Hayakawa et al., 2000; Muller-Gartner et al., 1992; Rousset and Zaidi, 2006; Rousset et al., 2008). However, the effectiveness of this method relies mainly on the accuracy of PET and MRI co-registration and tissue segmentation.

    • Anatomical standardization of small animal brain FDG-PET images using synthetic functional template: Experimental comparison with anatomical template

      2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Spatial normalization of functional images into anatomical space has already been investigated by means of three different methods: When an anatomical image of the same subject is available, PET images are co-registered to a magnetic resonance (MR) (Hayakawa et al., 2000) or computed tomography (CT) image. Then, the anatomical image is spatially normalized to an anatomical template and the normalization parameters are applied to the functional image.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) No. 10558115 from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.

    1

    Present address: National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.

    View full text