Elsevier

Surgical Oncology

Volume 6, Issue 3, November 1997, Pages 157-169
Surgical Oncology

Review
Advances in the early detection, diagnosis, and staging of pancreatic cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-7404(97)00025-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. It has long been regarded as one of the most difficult cancers to accurately diagnose and stage preoperatively. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the state-of-the-art for early detection, diagnosis, and staging of pancreatic cancer. These methods include spiral CT scans, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, laparoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, CA 19-9 serology, fine needle aspiration cytology, ERCP brush cytology, and screening for p53 and ras oncogenes. These advanced techniques should help us to detect pancreatic cancers in high-risk populations at a curative stage and to decrease pancreatico-duodenectomies for benign disease which could otherwise be treated with less morbid procedures. In addition, these tests will help reliably diagnose pancreatic cancer preoperatively.

References (79)

  • P.C. Freeny et al.

    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: diagnosis and staging with dynamic CT

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • W.A. Kalender et al.

    A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions

    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

    (1994)
  • D.E. Dupuy et al.

    Spiral CT of the pancreas

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • E.K. Fishman et al.

    Spiral CT of the pancreas with multiplanar display

    American Journal of Radiology

    (1992)
  • D.A. Bluemke et al.

    Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • K. Kaneko et al.

    Helical CT evaluation of arterial invasion in pancreatic tumors: comparison with angiography

    Abdominal Imagery

    (1997)
  • E.K. Outwater et al.

    MR imaging of pancreatic disorders

    Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    (1996)
  • A.D. Vellet et al.

    Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic ducts: comparative evaluation with CT and MR imaging at 1.5T

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • T. Gabata et al.

    Small pancreatic adenocarcinoma: efficacy of MR imaging with fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • R.C. Semelka et al.

    Pancreatic disease: prospective comparison of CT, ERCP, and 1.5T MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • M.F. Mueller et al.

    Pancreatic tumors; evaluation with endoscopic US. CT, and MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • H. Sittek et al.

    Static and dynamic MR tomography of the pancreas: contrast media kinetics of the normal pancreatic parenchyma in pancreatic carcinoma and chronic pancreatitis

    Rofo Fortschrift Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Verf

    (1995)
  • S.A. Mirowitz et al.

    Normal abdominal enhancement patterns with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • A.J. Megibow et al.

    Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability—report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • R. Bares et al.

    Positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine-18-labeled deoxyglucose (FDG) for the detection of pancreatic cancer: comparison with CT, ultrasonography (US), and ERCP

    Journal of Nuclear Medicine

    (1993)
  • T. Higashi et al.

    Differentiation of malignant from benign pancreatic tumors by FDG-PET: comparison with CT, US, and endoscopic ultrasonography

    Journal of Nuclear Medicine

    (1995)
  • C. Ho et al.

    FDG-PET evaluation of indeterminate pancreatic masses

    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

    (1996)
  • R. Bares et al.

    F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET in vivo evaluation of pancreatic glucose metabolism for detection of pancreatic cancer

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • J.P. Campbell et al.

    Pancreatic neoplasms: how useful is evaluation with US?

    Radiology

    (1988)
  • L.G. Strauss

    Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients

    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine

    (1996)
  • M.S. Ackerman et al.

    Identification and characterization of muscarinic receptors in cultured human pancreatic carcinoma cells

    Pancreas

    (1998)
  • L. Palazzo et al.

    Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan

    Endoscopy

    (1993)
  • K. Yasuda et al.

    Staging of pancreatic carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography

    Endoscopy

    (1993)
  • M.F. Muller et al.

    Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US. CT, and MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • K.C. Conlon et al.

    The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy

    Annals of Surgery

    (1996)
  • M.A. Cuesta et al.

    Laparoscopic ultrasonography for hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1993)
  • M. Muragiah et al.

    Early experience of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the management of pancreatic carcinoma

    Surgical Endoscopy

    (1993)
  • H.A. Mitty et al.

    Impact of fine-needle biopsy on management of patients with carcinoma of the pancreas

    American Journal of Radiology

    (1981)
  • P. Bret et al.

    Percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the pancreas

    Diagnostic Cytopathology

    (1986)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Hydrogen peroxide-response nanoprobe for CD44-targeted circulating tumor cell detection and H<inf>2</inf>O<inf>2</inf> analysis

      2020, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has difficulty conducting early diagnosis and therapy for pancreatic cancer because 1) most pancreatic cancer patients do not show any symptoms in the early stage. A few patents are accompanied with chronic pancreatitis, but are also difficult to diagnosis with current methods; 2) early solid tumors of pancreatic cancer are small and located in the retroperitoneum, which makes them insensitive to various of imaging techniques [3]; 3) most of tumor biomarkers in the serum of early pancreatic cancer patients do not show significant difference [4–6]; 4) pancreatic cancer tumor is easy to transfer to lung, brain, liver, bones and other organs; 5) pancreatic cancer patients are prone to develop resistance to chemotherapy drug such as gemcitabine [7,8]. Currently, early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer is mostly relied on the Computed Tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [9,10], of which shortcomings are obvious [11,12].

    • Effective screening for early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

      2015, Best Practice and Research: Clinical Gastroenterology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At present, CA19-9 remains the most commonly used serum tumor biomarker for PC. However, only 50% cases with PC < 20 mm are associated with a rise in CA19-9 [27]. In addition, its levels are also increased in benign pancreatic diseases.

    • Risk factors and early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

      2010, Gastroenterologia y Hepatologia
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text