Current trends in scintillator detectors and materials

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)00955-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The last decade has seen a renaissance in inorganic scintillator development for gamma ray detection. Lead tungstate (PbWO4) has been developed for high-energy physics experiments, and possesses exceptionally high density and radiation hardness, albeit with low luminous efficiency. Lutetium orthosilicate or LSO (Lu2SiO5:Ce) possesses a unique combination of high luminous efficiency, high density, and reasonably short decay time, and is now incorporated in commercial positron emission tomography cameras. There have been advances in understanding the fundamental mechanisms that limit energy resolution, and several recently discovered materials (such as LaBr3:Ce) possess energy resolution that approaches that of direct solid state detectors. Finally, there are indications that a neglected class of scintillator materials that exhibit near band-edge fluorescence could provide scintillators with sub-nanosecond decay times and high luminescent efficiency.

Introduction

This paper attempts to summarize some of the recent developments in scintillator materials. Most applications desire the same properties for an “ultimate” scintillator (high density and atomic number, high light output, short decay time without afterglow, convenient emission wavelength, mechanical ruggedness, radiation hardness, and low cost), but the lack of a perfect material has resulted in a number of different scintillators being developed and used for different applications [1], [2]. This paper briefly describes two such scintillation materials that have been developed in the past decade for use in high-energy physics and nuclear medical imaging. The properties of one of these materials spurred the investigation of the fundamental mechanisms that limit energy resolution, and has lead to some newly discovered scintillation materials that have unprecedented energy resolution. Finally, there has been recent revived interest in a scintillation mechanism that appears capable of producing scintillation materials that are both fast and luminous.

Section snippets

Lead tungstate

The present generation of high-energy physics experiments requires levels of radiation hardness >106 rads, a level unreached by existing materials. Short decay time is required because of the high bunch crossing (i.e. event) rate, but the high photon energies involved imply that materials with low scintillation efficiency can be used. The Crystal Clear Collaboration initially developed CeF3 to meet these needs [3]; CeF3 possesses a light output of 4000 photons/MeV, a decay time of 27 ns, and a 1.7

Lutetium orthosilicate

Many other applications, such as nuclear medical imaging, well logging, and treaty verification, desire to do gamma ray spectroscopy at high rates. There have been a number of Ce3+-doped materials developed in the past decade that provide this, and lutetium-based materials appear to yield particularly good properties [2]. The best known example is lutetium orthosilicate (usually known as LSO or Lu2SiO5:Ce), which has a light output of 25,000 photons/MeV, a decay time of 40 ns, and a density of

Non-proportionality

One aspect of LSO's performance has puzzled researchers—although it has a high luminous efficiency, its energy resolution is significantly worse than is expected from counting statistics. Many alkali–halide scintillators (including NaI:Tl and CsI:Tl) also share this undesirable feature and there has been a recent revival in efforts to understand this effect. Fig. 1 plots, for a variety of alkali–halide and non-alkali–halide scintillators, the energy resolution (for 662 keV gamma ray excitation)

Energy resolution

In the past few years, a number of other materials that have been investigated have extremely promising properties, including LaBr3:Ce [13], LaCl3:Ce [14], and RbGd2Br7:Ce [15]. These materials possess high luminous efficiency with excellent energy resolution and fast (∼50 ns) decay time, but have relatively low density (∼5 g/cc) and atomic number. Of these, LaBr3:Ce is probably the most promising material, with a light output of 61,000 photons/MeV (50% higher than NaI:Tl), a primary decay time

Scintillation from wide band-gap semiconductors

Most inorganic scintillators used today are based on insulating host crystals in which luminescent ions or complexes are imbedded. Sometimes the luminescent centers are intrinsic, such as the cerium in CeF3 or the tungstate complex in cadmium tungstate (CdWO4), and sometimes they are dopants, such as the thallium in NaI:Tl or cerium in LSO. In these materials, the ionizing radiation initially forms holes in the valence band and electrons in the conduction band, with enough energy being

Conclusion

There has been a significant amount of recent progress in scintillators. New materials for high-energy physics and positron emission tomography (lead tungstate and LSO, respectively) have recently completed the “development” phase of research and development and have just entered large-scale production. There have been significant efforts to understand the fundamental limits of energy resolution in scintillators, and it recently has been shown that the energy-dependent nature of the

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank several people for providing me with the data that is included in this paper, including E. Auffray, P. Dorenbos, J. Valentine, and S. Derenzo. This work was supported in part by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research, Medical Science Division of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098 and in part by Public Health Service grant number R01 CA48002 awarded by the National Cancer Institutes, Department of

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (244)

  • Gamma radiation detector selection for CT scanner

    2023, Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
  • Development of (C<inf>6</inf>H<inf>5</inf>C<inf>2</inf>H<inf>4</inf>NH<inf>3</inf>)<inf>2</inf>Pb<inf>1-x</inf>Cd<inf>x</inf>Br<inf>4</inf> crystal scintillators with two-dimensional quantum-well structures

    2021, Journal of Luminescence
    Citation Excerpt :

    The representative applications of scintillators are security [4,5], resource exploration [6,7], high energy physics [8–10], and medical imaging [11–13]. To detect ionizing radiations effectively and accurately, ideal scintillators need to meet the properties such as high density and large effective atomic number (Zeff) for the high X-and γ-ray sensitivity, fast luminescence decay without afterglow, and high light yield (LY) [14,15]. Scintillators are generally classified into two types based on their chemical compositions: organic and inorganic types [1].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text