Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 54, Issue 2, February 1999, Pages 90-94
Clinical Radiology

Original paper
Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of cervical nodal metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91066-8Get rights and content

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The accurate pre-operative assessment of cervical lymph nodes is a well recognized problem in the management of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Imaging techniques have improved the accuracy of staging but cannot determine if nodal enlargement is due to reactive changes or malignant involvement. We assessed the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting metastatic disease within the neck in oral cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 58 patients treated for oral squamous cell carcinoma. All patients had pre-operative MR imaging including axial and coronal short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences and pre- and post-gadolinium axial TI weighted sequences. Nineteen patients had bilateral neck dissections giving 77 sides of neck for study. MR images were reviewed for nodal involvement at each anatomical level within the neck and correlated with findings at histology.

RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 77 sides of neck contained histologically positive nodes (35.1 %). MRI sensitivity was 66.7 % and specificity 68 %. There was a false-negative rate of 20.9 % and false-positive rate of 47.1 %. Some enlarged, histologically positive nodes were not detected by MRI. Furthermore, in five cases the only histological evidence of nodal malignancy was the presence of a micrometastasis (<3 mm tumour deposit). MRI detected two of these.

CONCLUSION: MRI lacks sufficient sensitivity and specificity to replace elective neck dissection for both staging and prognostic purposes.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (22)

  • Prognostic Factors in Oral, Oropharyngeal, and Salivary Gland Cancer

    2017, Maxillofacial Surgery, 3rd Edition: Volume 1-2
  • Improving Target Definition for Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Place for Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 18-Fluoride Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography?

    2012, Clinical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A study that found that only micro-metastases of less than 3 mm were present in 25% of pathologically proven tumour-positive neck dissections showed that anatomical imaging intrinsically fails to detect malignant involvement of ‘normal’ sized lymph nodes [35]. CT and anatomical MRI have a comparable sensitivity and sensitivity of 50–80 and 70–90%, respectively [37,38]. The use of functional imaging with PET has the potential to improve upon the identification of malignant lymph nodes based upon anatomical features alone (Figure 1).

  • Accuracy of MRI in prediction of tumour thickness and nodal stage in oral squamous cell carcinoma

    2012, Oral Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The prognosis of OSCC is closely related to features of the primary tumour such as tumour thickness2,3 and of the cervical metastases such as extracapsular spread (ECS).4 Although it is recognised that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lacks the sensitivity to replace elective neck dissection,5 it remains a widespread imaging modality in the assessment of the primary tumour. Accurate prediction of histological tumour thickness (HTT) may influence management regarding surgical access, planned margins, use of reconstruction and elective neck dissection.

  • Management of clinically negative neck for the patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in the modern era

    2008, Oral Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The calculated sensitivity of CT and MRI for detecting lymph node metastases ranges from 36% to 94%, whereas the reported specificity ranges from 50% to 98%.15 The sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI are comparable.16,17 For marginally enlarged lymph nodes, examination by ultrasound imaging with fine needle aspiration cytology is superior to CT and MRI, if performed by an experienced radiologist, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 76% and 100%, respectively.18,19

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text