Validation and clinical application of computer-combined computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose head and neck images

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00313-3Get rights and content

Background

Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (PET-FDG) improves the detection of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), but lacks anatomical detail. The accuracy of registered computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) and PET-FDG in delineation of HNSCC at the primary site and its clinical application was investigated.

Method

Preoperatively 30 patients were staged clinically and each had either CT (23), MR (5), or both CT and MR (2) scans, as well as CT/MR-PET-FDG registration. Tumor margins or infiltrationspecific anatomical landmarks on the different scans were compared and judged against histology.

Results

For primary tumors CT-PET-FDG (97%) and MR-PET-FDG (100%) delineated the tumor more accurately than CT (69%) or MR (40%) alone. Similarly, CT-PET-FDG (98%) and MR-PET-FDG (100%) were better than CT (70%) and MR alone (80%) in identifying tumor invasion of specific anatomical structures. Management was altered in 7 of 30 patients. The registered images were particularly useful in delineating tumor extension in the infratemporal fossa, maxilla and mandible, and identifying recurrences obscured by scar tissue.

Conclusions

It is possible to accurately register CT, MR, and PET-FDG data sets in the head and neck. The initial results show that registered CT/ MR-PET-FDG images provide additional clinically relevant information over that obtained from clinical evaluation or conventional CT imaging.

References (14)

  • PhelpsPD

    Carcinoma of the larynx: the role of imaging in staging and pre-treatment assessments

    Clin Radiol

    (1992)
  • Van den BrekelMWM et al.

    Magnetic Resonance imaging vs palpation of cervical lymph node metastases

    Arch Otoloaryngol

    (1991)
  • MadisonT et al.

    Radiologic diagnosis and staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

    Radiol Clin North Am-Staging Neoplasms

    (1994)
  • WarburgO

    On the origin of cancer cells

    Science

    (1956)
  • StraussLG et al.

    The application of PET in clinical oncology

    J Nucl Med

    (1991)
  • BailetJW et al.

    Positron emission tomography: a new, precise imaging modality for detection of primary head and neck tumours and assessment of cervical adenopathy

    Laryngoscope

    (1992)
  • HaberkornU et al.

    Glucose uptake, perfusion, and cell proliferation in head and neck tumours: relation of positron emission tomography to flow cytometry

    J Nucl Med

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (69)

  • PET-CT for Staging and Detection of Recurrence of Head and Neck Cancer

    2021, Seminars in Nuclear Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The value of positron emission tomography (PET) for head and neck (H&N) cancer was recognised very early in the history of PET. H&N cancer was identified as one of the first clinical indications for PET.1,2 The advent PET-CT saw an acceleration of the clinical utility of this technique.

  • Target volume delineation in oropharyngeal cancer: Impact of PET, MRI, and physical examination

    2012, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
  • 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Occult Primary Head and Neck Cancers - An Audit and Review of Published Studies

    2012, Clinical Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, FDG PET provides limited anatomical information and localisation of small foci of tracer uptake is a challenge even with morphological imaging side by side with PET. Image fusion algorithms, which combine FDG PET to computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR), have been successfully developed in the head and neck, but their implementation into a clinical setting is difficult because application of these techniques is both labour intensive and time consuming [14]. Another important limitation of image fusion is that some misregistration is almost inevitable, even if the patient’s head and neck is in identical positions for the two separate scans.

  • Segmentation of positron emission tomography images: Some recommendations for target delineation in radiation oncology

    2010, Radiotherapy and Oncology
    Citation Excerpt :

    More importantly, the ground truth behind these images is nearly out of reach. In order to measure the tumour volume and its contours, the physician needs to acquire images with another modality than PET (e.g., CT) and/or to surgically extract the tumour [12,23,67,68]. Both ways are paved with difficulties.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text