Applications of PET in lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-2998(98)80035-4Get rights and content

An estimated 180,000 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed in the United States this year, and lung cancer accounts for approximately 25% of all cancer deaths. The overall 5-year survival rate is 14%, and this has not changed over the past several decades. Lung cancer diagnosis and treatment is a major health problem globally. Most lung cancers are detected initially on chest radiographs, but many benign lesions have radiologic characteristics similar to malignant lesions. Thus, additional studies are required for further evaluation. Computed tomography (CT) is most frequently used to provide additional anatomic and morphologic information about the lesion, but it is limited in distinguishing benign from malignant abnormalities in the lung, pleura, and mediastinum. Because of the indeterminate results from anatomic imaging, biopsy procedures including thoracoscopy and thoracotomy may be used even though one-half of the lesions removed are benign and do not need to be removed. FDG-PET imaging provides physiologic and metabolic information that characterizes lesions that are indeterminate by CT and that accurately stages the distribution of lung cancer. Exploiting the fundamental biochemical differences between cancer and normal tissues, FDG imaging takes advantage of the increased accumulation of FDG in transformed cells. FDG-PET is very sensitive (∼95%) for the detection of cancer in patients who have indeterminate lesions on CT. The specificity (∼85%) of PET imaging is slightly less than the sensitivity because some inflammatory processes such as active granulomatous infections accumulate FDG avidly. The high-negative predictive value of PET suggests that lesions considered negative on the study are benign, biopsy is not needed, and radiographic follow-up is recommended. Several studies have documented the increased accuracy of PET compared with CT in the evaluation of the hilar and mediastinal lymph node status in patients with lung cancer. If the mediastinum is normal on PET imaging and there is no other evidence of metastatic disease, the patient has a thoracotomy. If the mediastinum is abnormal on PET imaging, mediastinoscopy is performed with the PET images providing the lymph node stations to target. Whole-body PET studies detect metastatic disease that is unsuspected by conventional imaging and demonstrate some of the anatomic abnormalities detected by CT to be benign lesions. Management changes have been reported to occur in up to 41% of patients based on the results of the whole-body studies.

References (63)

  • KuriharaM et al.
  • MagrathI et al.

    Cancer in developing countries: opportunity and challenge

    J Nat Cancer Instit

    (1993)
  • BoringCC et al.

    Cancer statistics—1992

    CA

    (1992)
  • SmithTAD

    FDG uptake, tumour characteristics, and response to therapy: a review

    Nucl Med Commun

    (1998)
  • GinsbergRS et al.

    Non-small cell cancer of the lung

  • LindholmP et al.

    Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer: a PET study

    J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • HohCK et al.

    Cancer detection with whole-body positron emission tomography using flurodeoxyglucose

    J Comput Assist Tomogr

    (1993)
  • LoweVJ et al.

    Semiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities

    J Nucl Med

    (1994)
  • PatzEF et al.

    Focal pulmonary abnormalities: Evaluation with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • LoweVJ et al.

    Optimum scanning protocol for FDG-PET evaluation of pulmonary malignancy

    J Nucl Med

    (1995)
  • WahlRL et al.

    Staging of mediastinal non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET, CT and fusion images: preliminary prospective evaluation

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • LoweVJ et al.

    Application of PET in oncology imaging

  • MoriK et al.

    Small nodular lesions in the lung periphery: new approach to diagnosis with CT

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • KuriyamaK et al.

    Prevalence of air bronchograms in small peripheral carcinomas of the lung on the thin-section CT: comparison with benign tumors

    AJR

    (1991)
  • KubotaK et al.

    Differential diagnosis of lung tumor with positron emission tomography: A prospective study

    J Nucl Med

    (1990)
  • DehdashtiF et al.

    FDG-PET evaluation of suspicious pulmonary and mediastinal masses

    J Nucl Med

    (1992)
  • HunterGJ et al.

    Quantitative[18F] FDG PET in the monitoring and management of response to lung cancer therapy

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • StraussLG et al.

    PET follow-up studies to evaluate tumor perfusion and metabolism in patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • SlosmanDO et al.

    Satellite PET and lung cancer: A prospective study in surgical patients

    Nucl Med Comm

    (1993)
  • KnoppMV et al.

    Clinical application of FDG-PET for staging of bronchogenic carcinoma

    J Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • KhonsarySA et al.

    PET-FDG scanning in pulmonary mass lesions

    Clin Nucl Med

    (1993)
  • Cited by (87)

    • The role of dual time point FDG PET imaging in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules with an initial standard uptake value less than 2.5

      2011, Clinical Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SUVmax of the lesion can then be calculated according to the formula:SUVmax = tissue activity (MBq/ml tissue)/injected dose (MBq/body weight in g) In the evaluation of an SPN, an SUVmax of 2.5 or more is frequently used as a criterion for malignancy in interpreting single time point FDG PET imaging (when image acquisition starts at 60 min post-tracer injection).6,7 However, FDG as a marker of glucose metabolism is not a tumour-specific radiotracer8,9 and increased uptake does not always represent malignancy.

    • Evaluation of gross tumor size using CT, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET, integrated <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and pathological analysis in non-small cell lung cancer

      2009, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      When combined with the anatomic imaging it will provide better staging information for both local disease and the extent of metastases, especially in the definition of target volumes for radiotherapy [5]. Results of clinical studies of 18F-FDG PET have demonstrated its value in the diagnosis, staging, restaging and monitoring therapy response of cancer [11,12]. For treatment planning purposes, it was shown that the combined use of CT and 18F-FDG PET in lung cancer resulted in an improved delineation of GTV compared with that at CT alone.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text