A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience

https://doi.org/10.1016/0720-048X(93)90048-RGet rights and content

Abstract

The association between mammographic parenchymal patterns and the risk of subsequent breast cancer was studied in a cohort of 17911 women aged 40–70 years, enrolled in a mammographic screening program. The cohort was prospectively followed-up for 5 years after blind attribution of mammographic pattern. Incident cancers, either screen- or interval-detected, were monitored through the screening program and by the local cancer registry. Multivariate analysis adjusting for the confounding effect of age, demonstrated an independent and significant association between mammograpic patterns and breast cancer risk. The relative risk of subsequent breast cancer, assumed to be 1 for N1 pattern, was 2.39 (1.0–5.7) for P1, 4.02 (1.7–9.3) for P2, and 5.01 (1.9–13.3) for DY category, respectively. The relative risk of P2-DY with respect to N1-P1 categories was 2.09 (1.4–3.1). A diagnostic delay, possibly due to the ‘masking effect’ of a radiologically dense breast, was evident for P2-DY with respect to N1-P1 cancers (proportion of Stage I cancers = 42% vs. 69%). These results suggest the adoption of a shorter rescreening interval in P2-DY subjects.

References (23)

  • JN Wolfe

    Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer

    AJR

    (1976)
  • JN Wolfe

    Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern

    Cancer

    (1976)
  • RL Egan et al.

    Breast cancer mammographic patterns

    Cancer

    (1977)
  • ER Fisher et al.

    The histopathology of mammographic patterns

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (1978)
  • L Mendell et al.

    Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer? A reappraisal

    AJR

    (1977)
  • J Brisson et al.

    Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1982)
  • IH Gravelle et al.

    The relations between radiographic features and determinants of risk of breast cancer

    Br J Radiol

    (1989)
  • S Hainline et al.

    Mammographic patterns and risk of breast cancer

    AJR

    (1978)
  • PM Krook et al.

    Mammographic parenchymal patterns as risk indicators for incident cancer in a screening program: an extended analysis

    AJR

    (1978)
  • RG Peyster et al.

    Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the prevalence of breast cancer

    Radiology

    (1977)
  • E Wilkinson et al.

    Mammographic parenchymal patterns and the risk of breast cancer

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (1977)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Delayed diagnosis of symptomatic breast cancer

      2018, The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases
    • Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer?

      2013, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is no standardization of HBD definition, and quantification methods of measurements of HBD are variable and debated. Numerous studies established that mammographic high breast density (HBD) is an important breast cancer risk factor [2–11]. Other authors considered increased breast density as a moderate independent risk factor for breast cancer [12,13].

    • Bilateral mammographic density asymmetry and breast cancer risk: A preliminary assessment

      2012, European Journal of Radiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Second, although mammographic density has been widely recognized as one of strongest known risk factors and used in many of previous risk assessment studies or epidemiology-based models to date [9], previous studies have generated controversial or inconsistent results. Some studies concluded that mammographic density was an strong and/or important breast cancer risk factor [28–30], while others showed that high mammographic density was only a weak and quite confused risk factor [20,31,32] because these authors believed that assessing mammographic breast density could be quite biased. Breast density is not only influenced by many woman's life style factors (i.e., using hormonal agents, smoking and drinking alcohol) [33], but also difficult to be accurately measured from mammograms without knowing the exact X-ray exposure value and breast compression ratio [34].

    • A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification

      2012, Breast
      Citation Excerpt :

      Radiological breast density has been associated with breast cancer risk on an individual1–4 or familial basis5–7 and to mammography sensitivity, a significant association of interval cancer risk being associated with dense breast.8–12

    • Delayed Diagnosis of Symptomatic Breast Cancer

      2009, The Breast: Comprehensive Management of Benign and Malignant Diseases
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text