Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 44, Issue 12, December 1995, Pages 1617-1625
Metabolism

Is it possible to derive a reliable estimate of human visceral and subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue from simple anthropometric measurements?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-0495(95)90084-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of the study was to generate equations predicting visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal adipose tissue (AT) from simple anthropometric measurements. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to measure VAT and SAT cross-sectional areas at the level of L4 in 49 subjects (19 men and 30 women) with a large range of age and body mass index (BMI). BMI, waist and hip circumferences, waist to hip ratio (WHR), subscapular and paraumbilical skinfolds (ie, “simple” anthropometric measurements), total body fat content by the isotope-dilution method, and abdominal sagittal diameter by MRI (ie, “nonsimple” anthropometric measurements) were also measured. Equations to estimate VAT and SAT from age and simple anthropometric measurements (ie, excluding total body fat and abdominal sagittal diameter) were developed. These equations were then used in 24 subjects (nine men and 15 women) to Cross-validate them. The best regression equations, including waist circumference in men and waist circumference and age in women, explained 56% and 68% of VAT variability, respectively. The corresponding standard error of the estimate (SEE) in men was approximately 40% and in women approximately 37% of the mean value of VAT measured by MRI. The best regression equations developed to predict SAT had a higher explained variability (∼87% in both men and women) and a lower SEE (<20% of the mean values of SAT measured by MRI). In men, the equation included BMI and hip circumference, and in women, BMI and age. The inclusion of a higher number of simple anthropometric parameters in the predictive models neither significantly increased the explained variability of VAT or SAT nor significantly decreased the SEE of VAT or SAT. Also, inclusion in the multiple regression analysis of total body fat content and abdominal sagittal diameter did not improve prediction. In the cross-validation study, differences between predicted and observed values of VAT were large, with a tendency to overestimation in both men and women. Incontrast, differences between predicted and observed values of SAT were small. We suggest that SAT but not VAT can be estimated from age and simple anthropometric measurements. Direct methods (MRI, computed tomography [ct], or other options) should be used for assessment of VAT.

References (55)

  • AK Dixon

    Abdominal fat assessed by computed tomography: Sex differences in distribution

    Clin Radiol

    (1983)
  • S Fujioka et al.

    Contribution of intra-abdominal fat accumulation to the impairment of glucose and lipid metabolism in human obesity

    Metabolism

    (1987)
  • MC Pouliot et al.

    Waist circumference and abdominal sagittal diameter: Best simple anthropometric indexes of abdominal visceral adipose tissue accumulation and related cardiovascular risk in men and in women

    Am J Cardiol

    (1994)
  • JP Despres et al.

    Estimation of deep abdominal adipose-tissue accumulation from simple anthropometric measurements

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1991)
  • JC Seidell et al.

    Assessment of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: Relation between anthropometry and computed tomography

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1987)
  • H Kvist et al.

    Total and visceral adipose-tissue volumes derived from measurements with computed tomography in adult men and women: Predictive equations

    Am J Clin Nutr

    (1988)
  • AH Kissebah et al.

    Relation of body fat distribution to metabolic complications of obesity

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (1982)
  • M Krotkiewski et al.

    Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women

  • RK Kalkhoff et al.

    Relationship of body fat distribution to blood pressure, carbohydrate tolerance, and plasma lipids in healthy obese women

    J Lab Clin Med

    (1983)
  • JC Seidell et al.

    Measures of fat distribution as determinant of serum lipids in healthy volunteers consuming a uniform standardized diet

    Eur J Clin Invest

    (1988)
  • AJ Anderson et al.

    Body fat distribution, plasma lipids, and lipoproteins

    Arteriosclerosis

    (1988)
  • RB Terry et al.

    Regional adiposity patterns in relation to lipids, lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein subfraction mass in men

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (1989)
  • NM Kaplan

    The deadly quartet

  • D Blair et al.

    Evidence for an increased risk for hypertension with centrally located body fat and the effect of race and sex on the risk

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1984)
  • JV Selby et al.

    Precursors of essential hypertension

  • RL Weinsier et al.

    The relative contribution of body fat and fat pattern to blood pressure level

    Hypertension

    (1985)
  • KB Reichley et al.

    Centralized obesity and cardiovascular disease risk in Mexican Americans

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1987)
  • Cited by (0)

    Supported by grants from the Italian National Research Council and the Italian Ministry of University and Technological Research, and in part by National Institutes of Health Grant No. DK24092, a Veterans Affairs Merit Award, the Veterans Administration Medical Research Service, the General Research and Educational Clinical Center, and Clinical Research Center Grant No. M01-RR-0.1346.

    View full text