Regular paper
σ Binding site ligands inhibit cell proliferation in mammary and colon carcinoma cell lines and melanoma cells in culture

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(95)00115-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests a role for sigma (σ) binding sites in maintenance of cell growth and/or proliferation. The present study examines, for the first time, the effect of σ binding site ligands on in vitro growth of tumour cells derived from human mammary adenocarcinoma (MCF-7, MDA) and colon carcinoma (LIM 1215, WIDr), and melanoma (Chinnery). Addition of the σ ligands haloperidol, reduced haloperidol, 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine (DTG), (+)- and (-)-N-allylnormetazocine (SKF 10,047), (+)- and (-)-pentazocine and rimcazole at 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 μM at the beginning of culture or 24 h later, inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Light microscopy revealed cell detachment, rounding and cell death. The potency of σ ligands on melanoma cells was rimcazole > reduced haloperidol > haloperidol = (+)-pentazocine, whereas DTG and (+)- and (-)-SKF 10,047 and (-)-pentazocine had no effect even at 100 μM. In contrast, in MCF-7 cells, rimcazole > reduced haloperidol > haloperidol > (-)-pentazocine > DTG > (+)-pentazocine > (+)-SKF 10,047 > (-)-SKF 10,047. For colon cancer cells, reduced haloperidol > DTG > haloperidol = (-)-pentazocine = (+)-pentazocine = (+)-SKF 10,047. Of all the ligands tested, rimcazole and reduced haloperidol were the most potent inhibitors of cell proliferation. With the exception of one slow-growing colon cancer cell line (LIM 1215), the order of sensitivity of various cell lines to reduced haloperidol. SKF 10,047, DTG, haloperidol and (+)- and (-)-pentazocine was colon carcinoma > mammary adenocarcinoma > melanoma, whereas to rimcazole, the sensitivities of mammary adenocarcinoma and melanoma cells were comparable. The effect of σ ligands in MCF-7 and melanoma cells was not due to blockade of dopamine D1 and D2 receptors, serotonin (5-HT2) receptors, N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)/phencyclidine receptors, β-adrenoceptors or opioid receptors, since 100 μM SCH 23390, raclopride, mianserin, (+)-MK-801, propranolol and 1 μM naloxone respectively, were ineffective. However, mianserin and raclopride were inhibitory to melanoma cells and one colon carcinoma cell line, respectively. Taken together, the results are consistent with the recent observation that σ binding sites may play a role in cell growth and/or cell proliferation.

References (41)

  • G. Thomas et al.

    Sigma and opioid receptors in human brain tumours

    Life Sci.

    (1990)
  • B.J. Vilner et al.

    σ Receptor-active neuroleptics are cytotoxic to C6 glioma cells in culture

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1993)
  • J. Barg et al.

    In vitro and in vivo expression of opioid and σ receptors in rat C6 glioma and mouse N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells

    J. Neurochem.

    (1994)
  • A.S. Basile et al.

    Modulation of (+)-[3H]pentazocine binding to guinea-pig cerebellum by divalent cations

    Mol. Pharmacol.

    (1992)
  • W.T. Bem et al.

    Overexpression of sigma receptors in non-neural human tumors

    Cancer Res.

    (1991)
  • W.D. Bowen

    Biochemical pharmacology of sigma receptors

  • P.J. Brent et al.

    The selective sigma (σ) ligands DTG and (+)pentazocine dose-dependently modulate phosphorylation of synapsin I in rat cortical synaptosomes

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1994)
  • S.J. Bunn et al.

    Sigma ligands inhibit the muscarinic-induced increase in phosphatidylinositol accumulation in bovine adrenal medullary chromaffin cells

    Neurochem. Res.

    (1994)
  • J. Carmichael et al.

    Evaluation of a tetrazolium-based semiautomated colorimetric assay: assessment of chemosensitivity testing

    Cancer Res.

    (1987)
  • Q.Y. Chen et al.

    MHC-restricted response of CD8+ and CD4+ T cell clones from regional lymph nodes of melanoma cells

    Int. J. Cancer

    (1991)
  • Cited by (94)

    • Structure-activity relationships of mixed σ<inf>1</inf>R/σ<inf>2</inf>R ligands with antiproliferative and anticancer effects

      2022, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      A similar result was obtained in breast cancer cell lines (i.e., MDA-MB-361, MDA-MB-435, BT20, and MCF7) in which a concentration higher than 10 µM of HP-II displayed better cell growth inhibition when compared to haloperidol.102 Additional studies performed on WiDr, LIM 1215, and MCF-7 cells showed that haloperidol and (±)-HP-II determined rounding of cells, cell detachment, and cell death in a dose-dependent manner, with better results obtained for the MCF-7 cell line, in which a 100 µM concentration of HP-II determined a 98 % reduction of cell proliferation.103 Further studies aimed at understanding the cell death mechanism in WiDr and MCF-7 cells highlighted that the same concentration of HP-II triggered apoptosis through an increased release of Ca2+ from the intracellular compartments.104

    • Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of 6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives as sigma-2 receptor ligands

      2018, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another developing field is that sigma-2 ligands (agonists) bind to siamg-2 receptor and inhibit cancer cell proliferation and trigger cancer cell death via apoptosis pathway [1,4]. Many sigma-2 ligands showed strong inhibitory effects against various cancer cell lines both in vitro and in animal models [35–37]. In addition, sigma-2 ligands also demonstrated strong potentiation or synergistic effects when combined with an anticancer agent [38–40].

    • Cancer nanotheranostics: A review of the role of conjugated ligands for overexpressed receptors

      2017, European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many cancer cell lines overexpress σ receptors (Aydar et al., 2004), such as brain cancer cells (Thomas et al., 1990), renal carcinoma (Bem et al., 1991), colon cancer cells (Bem et al., 1991), both small- and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (John et al., 1995; Moody et al., 2000), melanoma, glioblastoma, neuroblastoma, and prostate cancer (Vilner et al., 1995a) and breast cancer (Crawford and Bowen, 2002). σ ligands were able to suppress the cellular proliferation of human mammary and colon carcinoma and melanoma cells (Brent and Pang, 1995). Human breast tumor biopsies showed elevated levels of σ receptors which were absent in normal tissues (Caveliers et al., 2002).

    • Synthesis and evaluation of tetrahydroindazole derivatives as sigma-2 receptor ligands

      2015, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus sigma-2 ligands may be used as cancer diagnostic agents in combination with PET (positron emission tomography),22–25 SPECT (single-photon emission computed tomography),26–28 and fluorescent/confocal microscopy imaging technologies.14 In addition, various sigma-2 ligands alone or in combination with other anticancer agents, such as gemcitabine or paclitaxel, have demonstrated to inhibit cancer cell proliferation, suppress tumor growth, and induce apoptosis.29–32 Thus sigma-2 receptor may provide a new therapeutic target for the development of novel anti-cancer agents.4,7,33

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text