Elsevier

American Heart Journal

Volume 104, Issue 3, September 1982, Pages 567-574
American Heart Journal

Reproducibility of equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease: Response of left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion to supine bicycle exercise

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(82)90228-9Get rights and content

Abstract

To evaluate the reproducibility of ejection fraction (EF) and regional wall motion (RWM) analyses by rest and exercise equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) in the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD), 18 patients underwent two maximum, multistage supine bicycle exercise studies separated by an interval of 2 weeks. There were no significant differences in EF between the two studies, both at rest (56.0 ± 13.8% vs 58.2 ± 11.7%, p = NS) and with exercise (51.1 ± 17.6% vs 54.3 ± 17.6%, p = NS) and a highly significant correlation was shown between the two groups of values (rest r = 0.90, exercise r = 0.93, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change from rest to exercise (−4.9 ± 12.0% vs −3.8 ± 11.5%, p = NS) between the two studies and the correlation was highly significant (r = 0.69, p < 0.01). The interstudy variabilities were 2.2 ± 6.1% and 1.2 ± 7.3% for rest and exercise, respectively, and 2.0 ± 9.2% for the change from rest to exercise. Ninety-four percent of both rest and exercise regions had similar RWM. Eighty-one percent of the abnormally contracting regions were common to both exercise studies. Utilizing conventional criteria for the diagnosis of CAD, 11 patients had abnormal EF response and nine had abnormal RWM response to exercise on both studies. Combining EF and RWM criteria resulted in the diagnosis of CAD in 15 patients in both studies. We conclude that: (1) there were no significant differences in rest and exercise radionuclide EF and RWM between two supine bicycle exercise studies performed 2 weeks apart in patients with stable CAD and there were significant correlations between the two studies; (2) despite these correlations, the interstudy variabilities emphasize the need for the inclusion of reproducibility studies in all evaluations of interventions by exercise radionuclide ventriculography; and (3) the variations in EF and RWM response to exercise result in a lack of uniformity between the two studies regarding the diagnosis of CAD based on conventional RNV criteria.

References (32)

  • JS Borer et al.

    Sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy of radionuclide cineangiography during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography

    Circulation

    (1979)
  • JA Jengo et al.

    Effects of maximal exercise stress on left ventricular function in patients with coronary artery disease using first-pass radionuclide angiocardiography. A rapid noninvasive technique for determining ejection fraction and segmental wall motion

    Circulation

    (1979)
  • MM Bodenheimer et al.

    Detection of coronary heart disease using radionuclide determined regional ejection fraction at rest and during handgrip exercise: Correlation with coronary arteriography

    Circulation

    (1978)
  • JA Caldwell et al.

    The detection of coronary artery disease with radionuclide techniques: A comparison of rest-exercise thallium imaging and ejection fraction response

    Circulation

    (1980)
  • TJ Brady et al.

    Exercise radionuclide ventriculography. Practical considerations and sensitivity of coronary artery disease detection

    Radiology

    (1979)
  • KM Kent et al.

    Effects of coronary-artery bypass on global and regional left ventricular function during exercise

    N Engl J Med

    (1978)
  • Cited by (39)

    • Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Cardiotoxicity

      2017, Anticancer Treatments and Cardiotoxicity: Mechanisms, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Interventions
    • Value of sequential monitoring of left ventricular ejection fraction in the management of thalassemia major

      2004, Blood
      Citation Excerpt :

      The recognized reliability of MUGA for assessing ventricular function was demonstrated by its selection as the method of choice for several major cardiac intervention studies in the 1980s and 1990s.38-41 The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of less than 3% for resting LVEF in our hands is comparable to that reported by other workers.18,19,21 Although MUGA was the tool available for sequential quantitative monitoring from the early 1980s, quantitative monitoring of LVEF is now possible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),42-44 which also has excellent reproducibility.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration.

    View full text