Original Article
Very low-activity stress/high-activity rest, single-day myocardial perfusion SPECT with a conventional sodium iodide camera and wide beam reconstruction processing

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-012-9596-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

A stress (S)/rest (R) 1-day Tc-99m sestamibi protocol is logistically advantageous and facilitates stress-only imaging. However, with conventional 370 MBq (10 mCi) S activity and subsequent 1,110-1,295 MBq (30-35 mCi) R activity there is a risk of S-to-R “shine-through” and underestimation of defect reversibility. New software methods cope with lower counting statistics and should allow for both a reduced S activity and also less likelihood of S-to-R “shine-through.”

Methods

102 prospective patients [49 men, 53 women; mean weight 178 ± 41 lbs (range 98-265 lbs); chest 41.5″ ± 4.0″ (range 32″-52″)] received 192.4 + 18.5 MBq (5.2 ± 0.5 mCi) Tc-99m sestamibi S (25 exercise, 77 regadenoson) activity followed in 30-40 minutes by “full-time” (12 minutes) two-headed NaI camera S SPECT. Immediately thereafter, a 16-minute S SPECT acquisition was also performed in 37/102 patients. Then at 60-80 minute post-S all patients received 1328.3 + 129.5 MBq (35.9 ± 3.5 mCi) Tc-99m sestamibi, and “half-time” (7.5 minutes) R SPECT was acquired. All tomograms were processed with wide beam reconstruction (WBR, UltraSPECT Ltd.) software. A time-adjusted R/S myocardial count density ratio (MCDR) was calculated using automated software. S SPECT quality was visually graded (poor, fair, good, excellent) based upon myocardial definition, cavity contrast, RV visualization, and noise. For comparison, the S/R MCDR was calculated in 581 consecutive patients undergoing a conventional 370 MBq R/1110 MBq S (10 mCi R/30 mCi S) protocol.

Results

S SPECT was normal in 44 patients (43%). Image quality was good-excellent in 93 (91%) patients with 12-minute S SPECT. Also in 37 (98%) patients with 16-minute S SPECT, quality was good-excellent. In patients with >42″ chests 12-minute S SPECT quality worsened with increasing chest circumference, manifested by myocardial “blurring.” Image quality improved by ≥1 grade in the 12/37 patients (32%) also undergoing 16-minute S SPECT. The time- and decay-corrected 12-minute mean R/S MCDR was 5.78, a ratio adequate to minimize S-to-R shine-through, as verified in phantom experiments, and significantly better than a 3.79 S/R ratio achieved in the 581 patients undergoing a conventional R/S protocol.

Conclusions

An approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi S) Tc-99m SPECT processed with WBR provides adequate image quality. For larger patients prolonging image acquisition to 16 minutes is beneficial. For patients with normal S SPECT, a S-only protocol is feasible, affording them a very low (approximately 1.4 mSv) radiation dose. If subsequent R SPECT is necessary, it can be performed with approximately 1,332 MBq (36 mCi) with minimal S-R “shine-through.”

Introduction

A stress/rest single-day Tc-99m sestamibi protocol is logistically advantageous and facilitates stress-only imaging.1, 2, 3 However, with a conventional 370 MBq (10 mCi) stress-injected activity and a subsequent 1,110 MBq (30 mCi) rest activity, there is a risk of stress-to-rest “shine-through” and underestimation of defect reversibility. For example, in a patient with stress-induced ischemia if the stress perfusion distribution is abnormal and if the resting perfusion distribution is entirely normal, the stress defect may be partially apparent in the resting scan if the rest/stress count density is not sufficiently great enough to minimize contribution, i.e., “shine-through,” from the initial stress perfusion scan.

In this study, we report a single-day stress/rest protocol using approximately 185 MBq (5 mCi) stress activity and approximately 6845 MBq (35 mCi) rest activity. We postulate that with this new protocol post-stress perfusion and gated functional image quality will be preserved despite the lower injected activity by means of wide beam reconstruction (WBR) processing, employing iterative reconstruction, resolution recovery, and noise reduction software.4, 5, 6, 7 Moreover, we postulate that the rest-to-stress count density ratio will be sufficiently high to minimize the likelihood of stress-to-rest “shine-through.”

Section snippets

Methods

This research protocol was approved by the St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Institutional Review Board.

Patient Studies

Image quality is summarized in Table 2. Post-stress image quality was judged to be good or excellent in 93% of the 102 patients undergoing 12-minute post-stress SPECT (Figure 2). Of the 37 patients also undergoing 16-minute post-stress SPECT image quality was good or excellent in 97%. However, the proportion of patients with “good-excellent” image quality was statistically similar for 12- and 16-minute acquisitions (92% of 102 vs 97% of 37, chi-squared analysis of proportions P = .51).

Summary of the Present Investigation

We have demonstrated that good or excellent post-stress image quality can be obtained in 93% of patients with 192.4 ± 18.5 MBq (5.2 ±_0.5 mCi) of Tc-99m sestamibi injected activity, a 12-minute SPECT acquisition with a conventional dual-headed NaI detector, and WBR processing. It is important to note that patients weighing >270 lbs and women with a bra cup greater than D were excluded from enrollment into this protocol. We believe that a separate-day protocol is most beneficial in such patients.

Conclusions

Tc-99m sestamibi post-stress SPECT, using approximately 192.4 MBq (5.2 mCi) of injected activity, acquired 20-40 minutes post-injection and processed with WBR provides adequate non-gated and gated SPECT image quality. Prolonging post-stress SPECT acquisition time from 12 to 16 minutes is beneficial, particularly for larger patients. Importantly, however, the present investigation excluded patients over 270 lbs and in women with bra cup sizes greater than D.

If subsequent resting SPECT is

Cited by (0)

Research grant support: Astellas Pharma.

View full text