Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the evaluation of patients with adnexal mass and to define the clinicopathological factors associated with misdiagnosis during frozen section evaluation.
Methods
The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy for adnexal mass were reviewed. Results of the intraoperative frozen section and permanent histology reports were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to reveal factors associated with misdiagnosis.
Results
The study group consisted of 748 patients. Of these patients, 509 (68.0 %) had benign, 43 (5.7 %) had borderline, 196 (26.2 %) had malignant histological diagnosis at permanent section. The overall agreement between intraoperative frozen section and permanent pathology was 96.8 %. Twenty four out of 745 cases (3.8 %) were misdiagnosed by frozen section. Univariate analysis showed that borderline histology (p < 0.0001) and tumor size larger than 10 cm (p = 0.012) were associated with misdiagnosis. According to multivariate analysis, borderline histology (OR: 22.6, p < 0.0001) was the only independent predictor for misdiagnosis during frozen examination.
Conclusion
The frozen section evaluation of the adnexal mass is highly accurate. However, tumor size greater than 10 cm and borderline histology are the factors that adversely influence the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section. Clinicians must be aware of these pitfalls during intraoperative decision making following frozen section report.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Myers ER, Bastian LA, Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Terplan MS, Cline KE, Gray RN, McCrory DC (2006) Management of adnexal mass. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 130:1–145
Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, Mol BW (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol 96(1):1–9
Brun JL, Cortez A, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M, Uzan S et al (2008) Factors influencing the use and accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3):244 e1–244 e7
Usubutun A, Altinok G, Kucukali T (1998) The value of intraoperative consultation (frozen section) in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(10):1013–1016
Heatley MK (2012) A systematic review of papers examining the use of intraoperative frozen section in predicting the final diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 31(2):111–115
Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Edelweiss MI, Stein AT, Bozzetti MC, Zelmanowicz A et al (2005) Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15(2):192–202
Geomini PM, Zuurendonk LD, Bremer GL, de Graaff J, Kruitwagen RF, Mol BW (2005) The impact of size of the adnexal mass on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol 99(2):362–366
Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M (2011) Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology. Gynecol Oncol 123(1):43–46
Taskiran C, Erdem O, Onan A, Bozkurt N, Yaman-Tunc S, Ataoglu O et al (2008) The role of frozen section evaluation in the diagnosis of adnexal mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(2):235–240
Tangjitgamol S, Jesadapatrakul S, Manusirivithaya S, Sheanakul C (2004) Accuracy of frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14(2):212–219
Song T, Choi CH, Kim HJ, Kim MK, Kim TJ, Lee JW et al (2011) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 122(1):127–131
Menzin AW, Rubin SC, Noumoff JS, LiVolsi VA (1995) The accuracy of a frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 59(2):183–185
Houck K, Nikrui N, Duska L, Chang Y, Fuller AF, Bell D et al (2000) Borderline tumors of the ovary: correlation of frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):839–843
Ilvan S, Ramazanoglu R, Ulker Akyildiz E, Calay Z, Bese T, Oruc N (2005) The accuracy of frozen section (intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 97(2):395–399
Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Hammond IG, Leung YC, McCartney AJ (2006) Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 25(3):216–222
Baker P, Oliva E (2008) A practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol 27(3):353–365
Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Koay E, Naran A, Ruba S (2010) Value of cytology in the intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a review of 402 cases and comparison with frozen section diagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol 118(3):127–136
Tempfer CB, Polterauer S, Bentz EK, Reinthaller A, Hefler LA (2007) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 107(2):248–252
Puls L, Heidtman E, Hunter JE, Crane M, Stafford J (1997) The accuracy of frozen section by tumor weight for ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol 67(1):16–19
Wang KG, Chen TC, Wang TY, Yang YC, Su TH (1998) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in gynecology. Gynecol Oncol 70(1):105–110
Gol M, Baloglu A, Yigit S, Dogan M, Aydin C, Yensel U (2003) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in ovarian tumors: is there a change in the course of time? Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(5):593–597
Acknowledgments
This study was presented in part at the 18th International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 19–22 October 2013 (paper poster presentation, #138).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest and have no grants or funds to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basaran, D., Salman, M.C., Boyraz, G. et al. Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section in the Evaluation of Patients with Adnexal Mass: Retrospective Analysis of 748 Cases with Multivariate Regression Analysis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 21, 113–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-014-9795-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-014-9795-5