Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section in the Evaluation of Patients with Adnexal Mass: Retrospective Analysis of 748 Cases with Multivariate Regression Analysis

  • Research
  • Published:
Pathology & Oncology Research

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section in the evaluation of patients with adnexal mass and to define the clinicopathological factors associated with misdiagnosis during frozen section evaluation.

Methods

The clinicopathological data of patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy for adnexal mass were reviewed. Results of the intraoperative frozen section and permanent histology reports were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to reveal factors associated with misdiagnosis.

Results

The study group consisted of 748 patients. Of these patients, 509 (68.0 %) had benign, 43 (5.7 %) had borderline, 196 (26.2 %) had malignant histological diagnosis at permanent section. The overall agreement between intraoperative frozen section and permanent pathology was 96.8 %. Twenty four out of 745 cases (3.8 %) were misdiagnosed by frozen section. Univariate analysis showed that borderline histology (p < 0.0001) and tumor size larger than 10 cm (p = 0.012) were associated with misdiagnosis. According to multivariate analysis, borderline histology (OR: 22.6, p < 0.0001) was the only independent predictor for misdiagnosis during frozen examination.

Conclusion

The frozen section evaluation of the adnexal mass is highly accurate. However, tumor size greater than 10 cm and borderline histology are the factors that adversely influence the accuracy of intraoperative frozen section. Clinicians must be aware of these pitfalls during intraoperative decision making following frozen section report.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myers ER, Bastian LA, Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Terplan MS, Cline KE, Gray RN, McCrory DC (2006) Management of adnexal mass. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 130:1–145

    Google Scholar 

  2. Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, Mol BW (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol 96(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brun JL, Cortez A, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M, Uzan S et al (2008) Factors influencing the use and accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of epithelial ovarian tumors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3):244 e1–244 e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Usubutun A, Altinok G, Kucukali T (1998) The value of intraoperative consultation (frozen section) in the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 77(10):1013–1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heatley MK (2012) A systematic review of papers examining the use of intraoperative frozen section in predicting the final diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Int J Gynecol Pathol 31(2):111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Medeiros LR, Rosa DD, Edelweiss MI, Stein AT, Bozzetti MC, Zelmanowicz A et al (2005) Accuracy of frozen-section analysis in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors: a systematic quantitative review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15(2):192–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geomini PM, Zuurendonk LD, Bremer GL, de Graaff J, Kruitwagen RF, Mol BW (2005) The impact of size of the adnexal mass on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol 99(2):362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bige O, Demir A, Saygili U, Gode F, Uslu T, Koyuncuoglu M (2011) Frozen section diagnoses of 578 ovarian tumors made by pathologists with and without expertise on gynecologic pathology. Gynecol Oncol 123(1):43–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taskiran C, Erdem O, Onan A, Bozkurt N, Yaman-Tunc S, Ataoglu O et al (2008) The role of frozen section evaluation in the diagnosis of adnexal mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(2):235–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tangjitgamol S, Jesadapatrakul S, Manusirivithaya S, Sheanakul C (2004) Accuracy of frozen section in diagnosis of ovarian mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 14(2):212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Song T, Choi CH, Kim HJ, Kim MK, Kim TJ, Lee JW et al (2011) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 122(1):127–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzin AW, Rubin SC, Noumoff JS, LiVolsi VA (1995) The accuracy of a frozen section diagnosis of borderline ovarian malignancy. Gynecol Oncol 59(2):183–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Houck K, Nikrui N, Duska L, Chang Y, Fuller AF, Bell D et al (2000) Borderline tumors of the ovary: correlation of frozen and permanent histopathologic diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 95(6 Pt 1):839–843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ilvan S, Ramazanoglu R, Ulker Akyildiz E, Calay Z, Bese T, Oruc N (2005) The accuracy of frozen section (intraoperative consultation) in the diagnosis of ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol 97(2):395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Hammond IG, Leung YC, McCartney AJ (2006) Intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a 5-year review with assessment of discrepant diagnostic cases. Int J Gynecol Pathol 25(3):216–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baker P, Oliva E (2008) A practical approach to intraoperative consultation in gynecological pathology. Int J Gynecol Pathol 27(3):353–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart CJ, Brennan BA, Koay E, Naran A, Ruba S (2010) Value of cytology in the intraoperative assessment of ovarian tumors: a review of 402 cases and comparison with frozen section diagnosis. Cancer Cytopathol 118(3):127–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tempfer CB, Polterauer S, Bentz EK, Reinthaller A, Hefler LA (2007) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumors of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 107(2):248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Puls L, Heidtman E, Hunter JE, Crane M, Stafford J (1997) The accuracy of frozen section by tumor weight for ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Gynecol Oncol 67(1):16–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang KG, Chen TC, Wang TY, Yang YC, Su TH (1998) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in gynecology. Gynecol Oncol 70(1):105–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gol M, Baloglu A, Yigit S, Dogan M, Aydin C, Yensel U (2003) Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in ovarian tumors: is there a change in the course of time? Int J Gynecol Cancer 13(5):593–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was presented in part at the 18th International Meeting of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 19–22 October 2013 (paper poster presentation, #138).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest and have no grants or funds to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Coskun Salman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Basaran, D., Salman, M.C., Boyraz, G. et al. Accuracy of Intraoperative Frozen Section in the Evaluation of Patients with Adnexal Mass: Retrospective Analysis of 748 Cases with Multivariate Regression Analysis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 21, 113–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-014-9795-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-014-9795-5

Keywords

Navigation