Skip to main content
Log in

Time efficient 124I-PET volumetry in benign thyroid disorders by automatic isocontour procedures: mathematic adjustment using manual contoured measurements in low-dose CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Benign thyroid diseases are widely common in western societies. However, the volumetry of the thyroid gland, especially when enlarged or abnormally formed, proves to be a challenge in clinical routine. The aim of this study was to develop a simple and rapid threshold-based isocontour extraction method for thyroid volumetry from 124I-PET/CT data in patients scheduled for radioactive iodine therapy.

Methods

PET/CT data from 45 patients were analysed 30 h after 1 MBq 124I administration. Anatomical reference volume was calculated using manually contoured data from low-dose CT images of the neck (MC). In addition, we applied an automatic isocontour extraction method (IC0.2/1.0), with two different threshold values (0.2 and 1.0 kBq/ml), for volumetry of the PET data-set. IC0.2/1.0 shape data that showed significant variation from MC data were excluded. Subsequently, a mathematical correlation using a model of linear regression with multiple variables and step-wise elimination (mIC0.2/1.0), between IC0.2/1.0 and MC, was established.

Results

Data from 41 patients (IC0.2), and 32 patients (IC1.0) were analysed. The mathematically calculated volume, mIC, showed a median deviation from the reference (MC), of ±9 % (1–54 %) for mIC0.2 and of ±8.2 % (1–50 %) for mIC1.0

Conclusion

Contour extraction with both, mIC1.0 and mIC0.2 gave rapid and reliable results. However, mIC0.2 can be applied to significantly more patients (>90 %) and is, therefore, deemed to be more suitable for clinical routine, keeping in mind the potential advantages of using 124I-PET/CT for the preparation of patients scheduled for radioactive iodine therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Westphal JG, Winkens T, Kuhnel C, Freesmeyer M. Low-activity (124)I-PET/low-dose CT versus (131)I probe measurements in pretherapy assessment of radioiodine uptake in benign thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:2138–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Darr AM, Opfermann T, Niksch T, Driesch D, Marlowe RJ, Freesmeyer M. Low-activity 124I-PET/low-dose CT Versus 99mTc-pertechnetate planar scintigraphy or 99mTc-pertechnetate single-photon emission computed tomography of the thyroid: a pilot comparison. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:770–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Etchebehere EC, Romanato JS, Santos AO, Buzaid AC, Camargo EE. Impact of [F-18] FDG-PET/CT in the restaging and management of patients with malignant melanoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:925–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Freesmeyer M, Dralle H, Winkens T. Diagnosis of small medullary thyroid carcinoma via PET/ultrasound (US) fusion. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:300–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reinartz P, Sabri O, Zimny M, Nowak B, Cremerius U, Setani K, et al. Thyroid volume measurement in patients prior to radioiodine therapy: comparison between three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Thyroid. 2002;12:713–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Isselt JW, de Klerk JM, van Rijk PP, van Gils AP, Polman LJ, Kamphuis C, et al. Comparison of methods for thyroid volume estimation in patients with Graves’ disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30:525–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rago T, Bencivelli W, Scutari M, Di Cosmo C, Rizzo C, Berti P, et al. The newly developed three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) thyroid ultrasound are strongly correlated, but 2D overestimates thyroid volume in the presence of nodules. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006;29:423–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shah PJ, Bright T, Singh SS, Lang CM, Pyragius MD, Malycha P, et al. Large retrosternal goitre: a diagnostic and management dilemma. Heart Lung Circ. 2006;15:151–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozgen A, Erol C, Kaya A. Ozmen MN, Akata D, Akhan O; Interobserver and intraobserver variations in sonographic measurement of thyroid volume in children. Eur J Endocrinol. 1999;140:328–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nygaard B, Nygaard T, Court-Payen M, Jensen LI, Soe-Jensen P, Gerhard NK, et al. Thyroid volume measured by ultrasonography and CT. Acta Radiol. 2002;43:269–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermans R, Bouillon R, Laga K, Delaere PR, Foer BD, Marchal G, et al. Estimation of thyroid gland volume by spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:214–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Licht K, Darr A, Opfermann T, Winkens T, Freesmeyer M. 3D ultrasonography is as accurate as low-dose CT in thyroid volumetry. Nuklearmedizin. 2013;26:53–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang CY, Lei YF, Tseng CH, Shih SR. Thyroid segmentation and volume estimation in ultrasound images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:1348–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofheinz F, Potzsch C, Oehme L, Beuthien-Baumann B, Steinbach J, Kotzerke J, et al. Automatic volume delineation in oncological PET. Evaluation of a dedicated software tool and comparison with manual delineation in clinical data sets. Nuklearmedizin. 2012;51:9–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kollorz EK, Hahn DA, Linke R, Goecke TW, Hornegger J, Kuwert T. Quantification of thyroid volume using 3-D ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27:457–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prieto E, Lecumberri P, Pagola M, Gomez M, Bilbao I, Ecay M, et al. Twelve automated thresholding methods for segmentation of PET images: a phantom study. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3963–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jentzen W, Freudenberg L, Bockisch A. Quantitative imaging of (124)I with PET/CT in pretherapy lesion dosimetry. Effects impairing image quantification and their corrections. Q J Nucl Med Mol Im. 2011;55:21–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Crawford DC, Flower MA, Pratt BE, Hill C, Zweit J, McCready VR, et al. Thyroid volume measurement in thyrotoxic patients: comparison between ultrasonography and iodine-124 positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:1470–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Committee MIRD. Summary of current radiation dose estimates to humans from 123I, 124I, 125I, 126I, 130I, 131I, and 132I as sodium iodide. J Nucl Med. 1997;16:857–60.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Weidemann J, Stamm G, Galanski M, Keberle M. Comparison of the image quality of various fixed and dose modulated protocols for soft tissue neck CT on a GE light speed scanner. Eur J Radiol. 2009;69:473–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Mr. Dominik Driesch for statistical work, and careful examination of the data presented in this publication. Furthermore we would like to thank ASK Scientific for providing services in translation and reviewing the manuscript carefully.

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no conflict of interests. This research was funded exclusively from the regular University Hospital Jena budget. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Freesmeyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freesmeyer, M., Kühnel, C. & Westphal, J.G. Time efficient 124I-PET volumetry in benign thyroid disorders by automatic isocontour procedures: mathematic adjustment using manual contoured measurements in low-dose CT. Ann Nucl Med 29, 8–14 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0903-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-014-0903-0

Keywords

Navigation