Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules in areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis

  • Original article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 18F-FDG-PET, PET/CT, and CT in the diagnosis of benign or malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) in areas with a high incidence of TB.

Methods

Ninety-six patients with a SPN smaller than 30 mm were studied prospectively. PET/CT images were obtained 60 min after intravenous injection of 18F-FDG. The data obtained for each patient were analyzed and the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated and compared using χ2 test.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV in the diagnosis of SPN were 86.7, 72.2, 81.3, 83.9, and 76.5%, respectively, for CT and 88.3, 61.1, 79.1, 79.1, and 75.9%, respectively, for PET. Tuberculosis was responsible for 57.1% (8/14) of false-positives on PET. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV in the diagnosis of SPN were 96.7, 75.7, 88.5, 88.1, and 94.4% for PET/CT. The accuracy of PET/CT was higher than that of either CT or PET alone (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

PET has a high false-positive rate in areas with a high incidence of TB; combined PET and CT (PET/CT) can improve the diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of an SPN.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ost D, Fein AM, Feinsilver SH. The solitary pulmonary nodule. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Winer-Muram HT. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiology. 2006;239(1):34–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leef JL, Klein JS. The solitary pulmonary nodule. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40(1):123–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein JS, Braff S. Imaging evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Clin Chest Med. 2008;29(1):15–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhuang H, Alavi A. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic imaging in the detection and monitoring of infection and inflammation. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;1(32):47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenbaum S, Lind T, Antoch G, Bockisch A. False-positive FDG PET uptake—the role of PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(5):1054–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong SY, Lee KS, Shin KM, Bae YA, Kim B-T, Choe BK, et al. Efficacy of PET/CT in the characterization of solid or partly solid solitary pulmonary nodules. Lung Cancer. 2008;61(2):186–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glaziou P, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Global burden and epidemiology of tuberculosis. Clin Chest Med. 2009;30(4):621–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fletcher JW, Kymes SM, Gould M, Alazraki N, Coleman RE, Lowe VJ, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008;49(2):179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SK, Allen-Auerbach M, Goldin J, Fueger BJ, Dahlbom M, Brown M, et al. Accuracy of PET/CT in characterization of solitary pulmonary lesions. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(2):214–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bakheet SMB, Powe J, Ezzat A, Rostom A. F-18-FDG uptake in tuberculosis. Clin Nucl Med. 1998;23(11):739–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Patz EF, Lowe VJ, Hoffman JM, Paine SS, Burrowes P, Coleman RE, et al. Focal pulmonary abnormalities: evaluation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET scanning. Radiology. 1993;188(2):487–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knight SB, Delbeke D, Stewart JR, Sandler MP. Evaluation of pulmonary lesions with FDG-PET. Chest. 1996;109(4):982–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med. 2001;42(9):1412–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Riad R, Omar W, Sidhom I, Zamzam M, Zaky I, Hafez M, et al. False-positive F-18 FDG uptake in PET/CT studies in pediatric patients with abdominal Burkitt’s lymphoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31(3):232–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bunyaviroch T, Coleman RE. PET evaluation of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(3):451–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Christensen JA, Nathan MA, Mullan BP, Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Lowe VJ. Characterization of the solitary pulmonary nodule: 18F-FDG PET versus nodule-enhancement CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187(5):1361–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK. Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285(7):914–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schrevens L, Lorent N, Dooms C, Vansteenkiste J. The role of PET scan in diagnosis, staging, and management of non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2004;9(6):633–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baldwin DR, Birchall JD, Ganatra RH, Pointon KS. Evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule: clinical management, role of CT and nuclear medicine. Imaging. 2004;16(1):22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bar-Shalom R, Kagna O, Israel O, Guralnik L. Noninvasive diagnosis of solitary pulmonary lesions in cancer patients based on 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose avidity on positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Cancer. 2008;113(11):3213–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gould MK, Sanders GD, Barnett PG, Rydzak CE, Maclean CC, McClellan MB, et al. Cost-effectiveness of alternative management strategies for patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(9):724–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong YJ, Yi CA, Lee KS. Solitary pulmonary nodules: detection, characterization, and guidance for further diagnostic workup and treatment. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(1):57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lodge MA, Badawi RD, Gilbert R, Dibos PE, Line BR. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(1):23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rong Tian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Su, M., Li, F. et al. The value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules in areas with a high incidence of tuberculosis. Ann Nucl Med 25, 804–811 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0530-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0530-y

Keywords

Navigation