Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of a breath-holding acquisition method in PET/CT for pulmonary lesions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of a breath-holding (BH) 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) technique for PET/computed tomography (CT) scanning of pulmonary lesions near the diaphragm, where image quality is influenced by respiratory motion.

Methods

In a basic study, simulated breath-holding PET (sBH-PET) data were acquired by repeating image acquisition eight times with fixation of a phantom at 15 s/bed. Free-breathing PET (FB-PET) was simulated by acquiring data even as moving the phantom at 120 s/bed (sFB-PET). Images with total acquisition times of 15 s, 30 s, 45 s, 60 s, and 120 s were generated for sBHPET. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and determination of the statistical significance of differences between sFB-PET images and sBH-PET images were performed. A total of 22 pulmonary lesions in 21 patients (12 men and 9 women, mean age 61.3 ± 10.6 years, 10 benign lesions in 9 patients and 12 malignant lesions in 12 patients) were examined by FB-PET and BH-PET). For evaluation of these two acquisition methods, displacement of the lesion between CT and PET was considered to be a translation, and the statistical significance of differences in maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the lesion was assessed using the paired t test.

Results

In the basic study, sBH-PET images with acquisition times of 45 s, 60 s, and 120 s had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than 120-s sFB-PET images (P < 0.05). In clinical cases, translation of the BH-PET images was significantly lower than that of the FB-PET images (benign: 5.29 ± 4.02 mm vs. 11.79 ± 8.27 mm, P = 0.005; malignant: 4.29 ± 3.36 mm vs. 18.26 ± 12.31 mm, P = 0.003). The SUVmax of the lesions in the BH-PET images was significantly higher than that in the FB-PET images (benign: 2.40 ± 0.86 vs. 2.20 ± 0.85, P = 0.005; malignant: 4.84 ± 2.16 vs. 3.75 ± 2.11, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

BH-PET provides images with better diagnostic accuracy, avoids image degradation owing to respiratory motion, and yields more accurate attenuation correction. This method is very useful for overcoming the problem of respiratory motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kubota K, Itoh M, Ozaki K, Ono S, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection. Eur J Nucl Med 2001;28:696–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhuang H, Pourdehnad M, Lambright ES, Yamamoto AJ, Lanuti M, Li P, et al. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1412–1417.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matthies A, Hickeson M, Cuchiara A, Alavi A. Dual time point 18F-FDG PET for the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med 2002;43:871–875.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Beyer T, Sashin D. Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. Med Phys 1998;25:2046–2053.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med 2003;44:240–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhurst T, Mueller S. Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:588–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pitman AG, Kalff V, Van Every B, Risa B, Barnden LR, Kelly MJ. Effect of mechanically simulated diaphragmatic respiratory motion on myocardial SPECT processed with and without attenuation correction. J Nucl Med 2002;43:1259–1267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Suga K, Yasuhiko K, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Seto A, Matsumoto T, et al. Assessment of regional lung functional impairment with co-registered respiratory-gated ventilation/perfusion SPET-CT images: initial experiences. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:240–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Allen-Auerbach M, Yeom K, Park J, Phelps M, Czernin J. Standard PET/CT of the chest during shallow breathing is inadequate for comprehensive staging of lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2006;47:298–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weckesser M, Stegger L, Juergens KU, Wormanns D, Heindel W, Schober O. Correlation between respiration-induced thoracic expansion and a shift of central structures. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1614–1620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL. Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:603–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2002;43:876–881.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, Squire OD, et al. Reduction of respiratory motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer by respiratory correlated dynamic PET: methodology and comparison with respiratory gated PET. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1644–1648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boucher L, Rodrigue S, Lecomte R, Benard F. Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: feasibility and initial results. J Nucl Med 2004;45:214–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras G, et al. The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1287–1292.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:601–609.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Defrise M. A factorization method for the 3D X-ray transform. Inverse Probl 1995;11:983–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoonjaans F, Zalata A, Depuydt CE, Comhaire FH. MedCalc: a new computer program for medical statistics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1995;48:257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TNH, Schwitter MR, Burger C, von Schulthess GK. PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J Nucl Med 2002;29:351–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiaki Yamaguchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, T., Ueda, O., Hara, H. et al. Usefulness of a breath-holding acquisition method in PET/CT for pulmonary lesions. Ann Nucl Med 23, 65–71 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0206-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0206-4

Keywords

Navigation