Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does partial volume corrected maximum SUV based on count recovery coefficient in 3D-PET/CT correlate with clinical aggressiveness of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

There is much controversy about the correlation between the degree of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake and clinical aggressiveness of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). In this study, we investigated whether partial volume corrected FDG uptake based on count recovery coefficient in 3D-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) correlates with the clinical aggressiveness of NHL and improves diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

Forty-two patients with NHL underwent FDG-PET/CT scans (26 aggressive NHLs and 16 indolent ones). Count recovery curve was obtained using NEMA 2001 body phantom. Scan protocol and reconstructive parameters in the phantom study were the same as those in a clinical scan except for emission time. Relative recovery coefficient (RC) was calculated as RC = A/B (A, maximum pixel count of each hot sphere; B, maximum pixel count of greatest sphere). Partial volume corrected maximum count of standardized uptake value (PVC-SUV) was calculated as PVC-SUV = NC-SUV/RC (NC-SUV: non-corrected maximum count of SUV). Three parameters (NC-SUV, PVC-SUV, and size) between aggressive and indolent NHLs were compared.

Results

Significant differences were shown in all parameters between aggressive and indolent NHLs. Means ± SD of NC-SUV, PVC-SUV, and size was as following: NC-SUV (15.3 ± 6.9, 8.7 ± 7.0; P < 0.01), PVC-SUV (18.2 ± 8.1, 12.7 ± 7.8; P < 0.05), and size (mm, 32.4 ± 18.3, 21.9 ± 10.3; P < 0.05). When an NC-SUV of 9.5 was the cutoff for aggressive NHL, the receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis correctly identified 21 of 26 aggressive ones. Sensitivity and specificity were 81% each, and the positive and negative predictive values were 88% and 72%, respectively. When a PVCSUV of 11.2 was the cutoff, the ROC analysis revealed 81% sensitivity, 63% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 78% and 67%, respectively. At a cutoff for aggressive NHL of a size of 27 mm, the ROC analysis revealed 50% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 81% and 50%, respectively. The comparison of area under the curve in ROC analyses indicated that NC-SUV showed the greatest diagnostic accuracy (NC-SUV 0.84, PVC-SUV 0.72, and size 0.69).

Conclusions

Diagnostic accuracy of PVC-SUV was inferior to that of NC-SUV. These results suggest that NC-SUV, which contains information on both size and FDG density, provides better differentiation between aggressive and indolent NHLs than PVC-SUV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood 1997;89:3909–3918.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hoh CK, Glaspv J, Rosen P, Dahlbom M, Lee SJ, Kunkel L, et al. Whole-body FDG-PET imaging for staging of Hodgkin’s disease and lymphoma. J Nucl Med 1997;38:343–348.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moog F, Banerter M, Diederichs CG, Guhlmann A, Kotzerke J, Merkle E, et al. Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging. Radiology 1997;203:795–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Israel O, Keidar Z, Bar-Shalom R. Positron emission tomography in the evaluation of lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2004;34:166–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutchings M, Mikhaeel NG, Fields PA, Nunan T, Timothy AR. Prognostic value of interim FDG-PET after two or three cycles of chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2005;16:1160–1168.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kazama T, Faria SC, Varavithya V, Phongkitkarun S, Ito H, Macapinlac HA. FDG PET in the evaluation of treatment for lymphoma: clinical usefulness and pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:191–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoder H, Noy A, Gonen M, Weng L, Green D, Erdi YE, et al. Intensity of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4643–4651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Newman JS, Francis IR, Kaminski MS, Wahl RL. Imaging of lymphoma with PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose: correlation with CT. Radiology 1994;190:111–116.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beyer T, Townsend DW, Brun T, Kinahan PE, Charron M, Roddy R, et al. A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1369–1379.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ell PJ, von Schulthess GK. PET/CT: a new road map. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:719–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J. Lymphoma classification-from controversy to consensus: the R.E.A.L. and WHO classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Ann Oncol 2000;11Suppl 1:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffmann M, Kletter K, Diemling M, Becherer A, Pfeffel F, Petkov V, et al. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (F18-FDG) does not visualize extranodal B cell lymphoma of the mucosaassociated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-type. Ann Oncol 1999;10:1185–1189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lapela M, Leskinen S, Minn HR, Lindholm P, Klemi PJ, Soderstrom KO, et al. Increased glucose metabolism in untreated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a study with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. Blood 1995;86:3522–3527.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leskinen-Kallio S, Nagren K, Lehikoinen P, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H. Uptake of carbon-11-methionine and fluorodeoxyglucose in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: a PET study. J Nucl Med 1991;32:1211–1218.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CG, Guhlmann A, Merkle E, Frickhofen N, et al. Lymphoma: role of whole-body 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) PET in nodal staging. Radiology 1997;203:795–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Stumpe KD, Urbinelli M, Steinert HC, Glanzmann C, Buck A, von Schulthess GK. Whole-body positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose for staging of lymphoma: effectiveness and comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Nucl Med 1998;25:721–728.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hickeson M, Yun M, Matthies A, Zhuang H, Adam LE, Lacorte L, et al. Use of a corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:1639–1647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Berthelsen AK, Holm S, Loft A, Klausen TL, Andersen F, Hojgaard L. PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1167–1175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Beyer T, Antoch G, Bockinsch A, Stattaus J. Optimized intravenous contrast administration for diagnostic whole-body 18FFDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005;46:429–435.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yau YY, Chan WS, Tam YM, Vernon P, Wong S, Coel M, et al. Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error? J Nucl Med 2005;46:283–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1519–1527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaskowiak CJ, Bianco JA, Perlman SB, Fine JP. Influence of reconstruction iterations on 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values. J Nucl Med 2005;46:424–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lodge MA, Badawi RD, Gilbert R, Dibos PE, Line BR. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional acquisition for 18F-FDG PET oncology studies performed on an LSO-based scanner. J Nucl Med 2006;47:23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Westerterp M, Pruim J, Oyen W, Hoekstra O, Paans A, Visser E, et al. Quantification of FDG PET studies using standardised uptake values in multi-centre trials: effects of image reconstruction, resolution and ROI definition parameters. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:392–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuya Tsujikawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsujikawa, T., Otsuka, H., Morita, N. et al. Does partial volume corrected maximum SUV based on count recovery coefficient in 3D-PET/CT correlate with clinical aggressiveness of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma?. Ann Nucl Med 22, 23–30 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-007-0084-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-007-0084-1

Keywords

Navigation