Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of retrospective image fusion of PET/MRI-DWI with that of PET/CT and MRI-DWI alone in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical and endometrial carcinoma.
Materials and methods
Twenty-seven patients with endometrial (n = 14) and cervical (n = 13) cancer who had undergone preoperative MRI-DWI and PET/CT for staging were retrospectively evaluated. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of PET/CT, MRI-DWI, and PET/MRI-DWI image fusion were calculated on a per-patient basis and on a per-node basis. Histopathological and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard.
Results
On a per-patient basis PET/MRI-DWI had the same sensitivity (87.5 %), specificity (84.2 %), diagnostic accuracy (85.1 %), PPV (70 %), and NPV (94.1 %) as PET-CT, but on a per-node basis PET/MRI-DWI showed better sensitivity (89 vs 70.2 %), specificity (91.6 vs 90.5 %), diagnostic accuracy (91.2 vs 87 %), PPV (68.7 vs 60.4 %), and NPV (97.6 vs 93.6 %) than PET-CT. Comparison of the areas under the ROC curves for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes demonstrated a non-significant difference (p = 0.055) between PET/CT and fused PET/MRI-DWI.
Conclusion
PET/MRI-DWI may be a valuable technique for N-staging patients with endometrial and cervical cancer, but more studies are needed to investigate its potential clinical utility.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al (2001) Estimating the world cancer burden: globocan 2000. Int J Cancer 94:153–156
Takeshima N, Yanoh K, Tabata T et al (1999) Assessment of the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging for early invasive squamous cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 74:165–169
Tanaka Y, Sawada S, Murata T (1984) Relationship between lymph node metastases and prognosis in patients irradiated postoperatively for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol Oncol 23:455–459
Downey GO, Potish RA, Adcock LL et al (1989) Pretreatment surgical staging in cervical carcinoma: therapeutic efficacy of pelvic lymph node resection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 160:1055–1061
Potish RA, Twigg LB, Okagaki T et al (1985) Therapeutic implications of the natural history of advanced cervical cancer as defined by pretreatment surgical staging. Cancer 56:956–960
Lagasse LD, Creasman WT, Shingleton HM et al (1980) Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic and Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 9:90–98
Kupets R, Covens A (2001) Is the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical carcinoma able to predict survival in patients with cervical carcinoma? An assessment of clinimetric properties. Cancer 92:796–804
Chung CK, Nahhas WA, Zaino R et al (1981) Histologic grade and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol 12:348–354
Van Nagell JR, Roddick JW et al (1971) The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathological findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:973–978
Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK et al (2006) Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer: a study of 12,333 patients. Cancer 107:1823–1830
Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW et al (2008) Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of meta-static from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:714–719
Nakai G, Matsuki M, Inada Y et al (2008) Detection and evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with gynecologic malignancies using body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32:764–768
Lin G, Ho KC, Wang JJ et al (2008) Detection of lymph node metastasis in cervical and uterine cancers by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:128–135
Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS et al (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922
Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M et al (2006) Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 238:272–279
Park JY, Kim EN, Kim DY et al (2008) Comparison of the validity of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of patients with uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol Oncol 108:486–492
Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2008) Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Roentgenol 190:1652–1658
Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E et al (2009) Accuracy of integrated FDG-PET/contrastenhanced CT in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer. Eur Radiol 19:1529–1536
Chung HH, Park NH, Kim JW et al (2009) Role of integrated PET-CT in pelvic lymph node staging of cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67:61–66
Signorelli M, Guerra L, Buda A et al (2009) Role of the integrated FDG PET/CT in the surgical management of patients with high risk clinical early stage endometrial cancer: detection of pelvic nodal metastases. Gynecol Oncol 115:231–235
Herrman KA, Kohan AA, Gaeta MC et al (2013) PET/MRI: applications in clinical imaging. Curr Radiol Rep 1:161–176
Yankeelova TE, Petersona TE, Abramsona RG et al (2012) Simultaneous PET–MRI in oncology: a solution looking for a problem? Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1342–1356
Kim SK, Choi HJ, Park SY et al (2009) Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 45:2103–2109
Katajima K, Suenaga Y, Ueno Y et al (2013) Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI. Eur J Radiol 82:1672–1676
Chou HH, Chang TC, Yen TC et al (2006) Low value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J Clin Oncol 24(1):123–128
Ma SY, See LC, Lai CH et al (2003) Delayed (18)F-FDG PET for detection of paraaortic lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. J Nucl Med 44(11):1775–1783
Hricak H, Rubinstein LV, Gherman GM et al (1991) MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study. Radiology 179:829–832
Sugiyama T, Nishida T, Ushijima K et al (1995) Detection of lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma and uterine corpus carcinoma by preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol 21:551–556
Connor JP, Andrews JI, Anderson B et al (2000) Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 95:692–696
Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca G et al (2004) Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231:372–378
Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:2813–2821
Rockall AG, Meroni R, Sohaib SA et al (2007) Evaluation of endometrial carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:188–196
Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI et al (1994) Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology 190:807–811
Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK et al (1997) Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. A meta-analysis. JAMA 278:1096–1101
Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, Knapstein PG et al (1998) Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:75–81
Yang WT, Lam WW, MY Yu, Cheung TH et al (2000) Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 175:759–766
Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D et al (2001) Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology 218:776–782
Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y et al (2012) Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 4(5):207–214
Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952
Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kigawa J et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results. Eur Radiol 18:384–389
Kilgore LC, Partridge EE, Alvarez RD et al (1995) Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of patients with and without pelvic lymph node sampling. Gynecol Oncol 56:29–33
Mariani A, Webb MJ, Galli L et al (2000) Potential therapeutic role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in node positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 76(3):348–356
ACOG (2005) Committee on Practice Bulletins. Manag Endometr Cancer 65:1–9
Chan JK, Cheung MK, Huh WK et al (2006) Therapeutic role of lymph node resection in endometrioid corpus cancer a study of 12,333 patients. Cancer 107(8):1823–1830
Bernardini MQ, May T, Khalifa MA et al (2009) Evaluation of two management strategies for preoperative grade 1 endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 114(1):7–15
Kitchener H, Swart AM, Qian Q et al (2009) Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomized study. Lancet 373(9658):125–136
Benedetti Panici P, Basile S, Maneschi F et al (2008) Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(23):1707–1716
Zhou J, Ran J, He ZY et al (2015) Tailoring pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with stage IA2, IB1, and IIA1 uterine cervical cancer. J Cancer 6(4):377–381
Todo Y, Yamamoto R, Minobe S et al (2010) Risk factors for postoperative lower-extremity lymphedema in endometrial cancer survivors who had treatment including lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 119(1):60–64
Kong TW, Lee KM, Cheong JY et al (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic vs. conventional open surgical staging procedure for endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 21(2):106–111
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
Informed consent was obtained from all participants. As the study was retrospective, approval of the local ethics committee was not sought.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stecco, A., Buemi, F., Cassarà, A. et al. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastases. Radiol med 121, 537–545 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0626-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-016-0626-5