Skip to main content
Log in

Computed tomography calcium score scan for attenuation correction of N-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography: effect of respiratory phase and registration method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of coronary calcium scoring (CaScCT) for attenuation correction (AC) of 13N-ammonia PET/CT studies (NH3) is still being debated. We compare standard ACCT to CaScCT using various respiratory phases and co-registration methods for AC. Forty-one patients underwent a stress/rest NH3. Standard ACCT scans and CaScCT acquired during inspiration (CaScCTinsp, 26 patients) or expiration (CaScCTexp, 15 patients) were used to correct PET data for photon attenuation. Resulting images were compared using Pearson’s correlation and Bland–Altman (BA) limits of agreement (LA) on segmental relative and absolute coronary blood flow (CBF) using both manual and automatic co-registration methods (rigid-body and deformable). For relative perfusion, CaScCTexp correlates better than CaScCTinsp with ACCT when using manual co-registration (r = 0.870; P < 0.001 and r = 0.732; P < 0.001, respectively). Automatic co-registration provides the best correlation between CaScCTexp and ACCT for relative perfusion (r = 0.956; P < 0.001). Both CaScCTinsp and CaScCTexp yielded excellent correlations with ACCT for CBF when using manual co-registration (r = 0.918; P < 0.001; BA mean bias 0.05 ml/min/g; LA: −0.42 to +0.3 ml/min/g and r = 0.97; P < 0.001; BA mean bias 0.1 ml/min/g; LA: −0.65 to +0.5 ml/min/g, respectively). The use of CaScCTexp and deformable co-registration is best suited for AC to quantify relative perfusion and CBF enabling substantial radiation dose reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Di Carli M, Lipton M (eds) (2007) Cardiac PET and PET/CT imaging. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zaidi H, Hasegawa BH (2003) Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. J Nucl Med 44:291–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Tay FM et al (2009) Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. El Fakhri G, Kardan A, Sitek A, Dorbala S, Abi-Hatem N, Lahoud Y et al (2009) Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: comparison with (13)N-ammonia PET. J Nucl Med 50:1062–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McQuaid S, Hutton B (2008) Sources of attenuation-correction artefacts in cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT. Eur J Nuc Med Mol Imaging 35:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Loghin C, Sdringola S, Gould KL (2004) Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions. J Nucl Med 45:1029–1039

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koepfli P, Hany TF, Wyss CA, Namdar M, Burger C, Konstantinidis AV et al (2004) CT attenuation correction for myocardial perfusion quantification using a PET/CT hybrid scanner. J Nucl Med 45:537–542

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Navab N, Schwaiger M, Nekolla SG (2007) Artifacts from misaligned CT in cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies: frequency, effects, and potential solutions. J Nucl Med 48:188–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lautamaki R, Brown T, Merrill J, Bengel F (2008) CT-based attenuation correction in 82Rb-myocardial perfusion PET/CT: incidence of misalignment and effect on regional tracer distribution. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bond S, Kadir T, Hamill J, Casey M, Platsch G, Burckhardt D, et al (2008) Automatic registration of cardiac PET/CT for attenuation correction. In: IEEE nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference, Dresden, Germany, 19–25 Oct 2008, pp 5512–5517

  11. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Guha A, Sdringola S (2007) Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: a definitive analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections. J Nucl Med 48:1112–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagel CCA, Bosmans G, Dekker ALAJ, Ollers MC, De Ruysscher DKM, Lambin P et al (2006) Phased attenuation correction in respiration correlated computed tomography/positron emitted tomography. Med Phys 33:1840–1847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pan T, Mawlawi O, Luo D, Liu HH, Chi PM, Mar MV et al (2006) Attenuation correction of PET cardiac data with low-dose average CT in PET/CT. Med Phys 33:3931–3938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook RAH, Carnes G, Lee T-Y, Wells RG (2007) Respiration-averaged CT for attenuation correction in canine cardiac PET/CT. J Nucl Med 48:811–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McQuaid SJ, Lambrou T, Hutton BF (2011) A novel method for incorporating respiratory-matched attenuation correction in the motion correction of cardiac PET-CT studies. Phys Med Biol 56:2903–2915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Sdringola S (2008) Reducing radiation dose in rest-stress cardiac PET/CT by single poststress cine CT for attenuation correction: quantitative validation. J Nucl Med 49:738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buther F, Stegger L, Dawood M, Range F, Schafers M, Fischbach R et al (2007) Effective methods to correct contrast agent-induced errors in PET quantification in cardiac PET/CT. J Nucl Med 48:1060–1068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu T-H, Zhang G, Wang S-J, Chen C-H, Yang B-H, Wu N-Y et al (2010) Low-dose interpolated average CT for attenuation correction in cardiac PET/CT. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A 619:361–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM et al (2007) ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography) developed in collaboration with the Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:378–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wexler L (2008) What is the value of measuring coronary artery calcification? Radiology 246:1–2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghafarian P, Aghamiri SM, Ay MR, Fallahi B, Rahmim A, Schindler TH et al (2010) Coronary calcium score scan-based attenuation correction in cardiovascular PET imaging. Nucl Med Commun 31:780–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Burkhard N, Herzog BA, Husmann L, Pazhenkottil AP, Burger IA, Buechel RR et al (2010) Coronary calcium score scans for attenuation correction of quantitative PET/CT (13)N-ammonia myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:517–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mylonas I, Kazmi M, Fuller L, deKemp RA, Yam Y, Chen L et al (2012) Measuring coronary artery calcification using positron emission tomography-computed tomography attenuation correction images. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 13:786–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK et al (2002) Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Nucl Cardiol 9:240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jacome R, Jimenez M, Romero E, Meave A et al (2012) Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT. J Nucl Med 53:171–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M, Rosenspire KC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert H, Kuhl DE (1990) Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:1032–1042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sadeghi M, Schwartz R, Beanlands R, Al-Mallah M, Bengel M, Borges-Neto S et al (2011) Cardiovascular nuclear imaging: balancing proven clinical value and potential radiation risk. J Nucl Med 52:1162–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ICRP publication 80 (1998) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant SNSF 31003A-135576 and Geneva University Hospital under grant PRD-11-II-1.

Conflict of interest

S.B. and J.D. are employees of Siemens Healthcare. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib Zaidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaidi, H., Nkoulou, R., Bond, S. et al. Computed tomography calcium score scan for attenuation correction of N-13 ammonia cardiac positron emission tomography: effect of respiratory phase and registration method. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 1351–1360 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0207-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-013-0207-9

Keywords

Navigation