Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical utility of a Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) analysis module of a picture archiving communication system (PACS) workstation in comparison to a dedicated PET/CT interpretation workstation.
Materials and Methods
The study included 32 consecutive patients referred for an [18F] Fluro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT at our institution. Images were reviewed at dedicated PET/CT and at PACS-integrated workstations. Mean standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for the liver and the lung. Maximum SUVs were recorded for the bladder and an index lesion with the highest FDG uptake. The time spent for SUV measurements was recorded. Correlation of the SUV measurements was calculated with the Pearson coefficient.
Results
Pearson coefficients between the workstations ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 for bladder and lesion maximum SUVs. For liver and lung average SUVs, the coefficients varied from 0.53 to 0.98. The mean time spent to perform the four SUV measurements was 122.6 s for the dedicated workstations and 134.6 s for the PACS-integrated system.
Conclusion
The correlation of SUV measurements between dedicated PET/CT and PACS-integrated workstations is very good, especially for maximum SUVs. For routine reading of PET/CT scans, a PACS workstation with a PET/CT analysis module offers an excellent alternative to the use of a dedicated PET/CT workstation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SC Huang (2000) ArticleTitleAnatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value Nucl Med Biol 27 IssueID7 643–646 Occurrence Handle11091106 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0969-8051(00)00155-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7htVylsA%3D%3D
RJ Downey T Akhurst M Gonen A Vincent MS Bains S Larson et al. (2004) ArticleTitlePreoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection J Clin Oncol 22 IssueID16 3255–3260 Occurrence Handle15310769 Occurrence Handle10.1200/JCO.2004.11.109
N Rizk RJ Downey T Akhurst M Gonen MS Bains S Larson et al. (2006) ArticleTitlePreoperative 18[F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography standardized uptake values predict survival after esophageal adenocarcinoma resection Ann Thorac Surg 81 IssueID3 1076–1081 Occurrence Handle16488726 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.063
N Avril J Dose F Janicke S Ziegler W Romer W Weber et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAssessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose J Natl Cancer Inst 88 IssueID17 1204–1209 Occurrence Handle8780629 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/88.17.1204 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA2svjtlw%3D
VJ Lowe JM Hoffman DM DeLong EF Patz RE Coleman (1994) ArticleTitleSemiquantitative and visual analysis of FDG-PET images in pulmonary abnormalities J Nucl Med 35 IssueID11 1771–1776 Occurrence Handle7965154 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqD2Mvkslw%3D
WA Weber SI Ziegler R Thodtmann AR Hanauske M Schwaiger (1999) ArticleTitleReproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET J Nucl Med 40 IssueID11 1771–1777 Occurrence Handle10565769 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FivFCquw%3D%3D
H Young R Baum U Cremerius K Herholz O Hoekstra AA Lammertsma et al. (1999) ArticleTitleMeasurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group Eur J Cancer 35 IssueID13 1773–1782 Occurrence Handle10673991 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jvV2ntA%3D%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meirelles, G.S.P., Kijewski, P. & Akhurst, T. Correlation of PET/CT Standardized Uptake Value Measurements Between Dedicated Workstations and a PACS-Integrated Workstation System. J Digit Imaging 20, 307–313 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0861-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0861-8