Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and metabolic index (MI) from fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

From October 2002 to July 2004, 41 patients with NPC who underwent 18F-FDG PET-CT scan before and after radiotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy using 6MV X-rays. We examined the association of MTV and the results of long-term follow-up of the patients.

Results

Patients having tumors with an MTV below 30 cm3 had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) (84.6:46.7%, P = 0.006) and disease-free survival (DFS) (73.1:40.0%, P = 0.014) than patients with an MTV of 30 cm3 or greater. And the patients with MI below 130 had significantly higher 5-year OS (88.0:43.8%, P = 0.002) and DFS (76.0:37.5%, P = 0.005) than other patients. In the Cox multivariate analysis, MI and metabolic response (MR) were predictive of DFS, and we did not find a significant relationship between standard uptake value (SUV) and OS or DFS.

Conclusions

The present study shows that tumor volume parameters, especially the combination of MTV and SUV in the “metabolic index”, are valuable for predicting long-term survival. High MI may be useful for identifying patients requiring more aggressive treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allal AS, Slosman DO, Kebdani T et al (2004) Prediction of outcome in head-and-neck cancer patients using the standardized uptake value of 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1295–1300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan SC, Chang JT, Wang HM et al (2009) Prediction for distant failure in patients with stage M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the role of standardized uptake value. Oral Oncol 45:52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME et al (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25:579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 80:11–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eschmann SM, Friedel G, Paulsen F et al (2006) Is standardized (18)F-FDG uptake value an outcome predictor in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greven KM, Williams DW 3rd, McGuirt WF Sr et al (2001) Serial positron emission tomography scans following radiation therapy of patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 23:942–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grow A, Quon A, Graves EE et al (2005) Metabolic tumor volume as an independent prognostic factor in lymphoma. J Clin Oncol (ASCO Ann Meeting Proc Suppl) 23:6594

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang SC (2000) Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol 27:643–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Juweid ME, Stroobants S, Hoekstra OS et al (2007) Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25:571–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kao CH, Shiau YC, Shen YY et al (2002) Detection of recurrent or persistent nasopharyngeal carcinomas after radiotherapy with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile single photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography: comparison with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Cancer 94:1981–1986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna SM, James S, Balaram P (2006) Expression of VEGF as prognosticator in primary nasopharyngeal cancer and its relation to EBV status. Virus Res 115:85–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La TH, Filion EJ, Turnbull BB et al (2009) Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1335–1341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SW, Cho KJ, Park JH et al (2005) Expressions of Ku70 and DNA-PKcs as prognostic indicators of local control in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:1451–1457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee P, Weerasuriya DK, Lavori PW et al (2007) Metabolic tumor burden predicts for disease progression and death in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:328–333

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee SW, Nam SY, Im KC et al (2008) Prediction of prognosis using standardized uptake value of 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography for nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Radiother Oncol 87:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C et al (2007) Early 18F-FDG PET for prediction of prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: SUV-based assessment versus visual analysis. J Nucl Med 48:1626–1632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lordick F, Ott K, Krause BJ et al (2007) PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial. Lancet Oncol 8:797–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias C, Hanna WT, Wahl LM et al (2007) Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 48:744–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakao K, Mochiki M, Nibu K et al (2006) Analysis of prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: impact of in situ hybridization for Epstein–Barr virus encoded small RNA 1. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 134:639–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roedl JB, Halpern EF, Colen RR et al (2009) Metabolic tumor width parameters as determined on PET/CT predict disease-free survival and treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Mol Imaging Biol 11:54–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H et al (2005) [18F]Fluorodeoxy-glucose uptake by positron emission tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:1136–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz JK, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F et al (2008) Tumor response and survival predicted by post-therapy FDG-PET/CT in anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71:180–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Song SY, Kim JH, Ryu JS et al (2005) FDG-PET in the prediction of pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced, resectable esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63:1053–1059

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro SG, Buscombe J, Cook G et al (2008) Ensuring the right PET scan for the right patient. Lung Cancer 59:48–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swisher SG, Maish M, Erasmus JJ et al (2004) Utility of PET, CT, and EUS to identify pathologic responders in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1152–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai MH, Shiau YC, Kao CH et al (2002) Detection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinomas with positron emission tomography using 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose in patients with indeterminate magnetic resonance imaging findings after radiotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 128:279–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Rens MT, de la Riviere AB, Elbers HR et al (2000) Prognostic assessment of 2,361 patients who underwent pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer, stage I, II, and IIIA. Chest 117:374–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Tinteren H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF et al (2002) Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359:1388–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LF, Chai CY, Kuo WR et al (2006) Correlation between proliferating cell nuclear antigen and p53 protein expression and 5-year survival rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Am J Otolaryngol 27:101–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wieder HA, Beer AJ, Lordick F et al (2005) Comparison of changes in tumor metabolic activity and tumor size during chemotherapy of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. J Nucl Med 46:2029–2034

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong RJ, Lin DT, Schoder H et al (2002) Diagnostic and prognostic value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:4199–4208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X, Yu J, Sun X et al (2008) The prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by using serial positron emission tomography and computed tomography in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 31:470–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh SA, Tang Y, Lui CC et al (2005) Treatment outcomes and late complications of 849 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62:672–679

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Huiqing Li and Jinsong Zheng for their assistance with this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Ming Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xie, P., Yue, JB., Zhao, Hx. et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET-CT metabolic index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136, 883–889 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-009-0729-7

Keywords

Navigation