Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid computational phantoms for medical dose reconstruction

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As outlined in NCRP Report No. 160 of the US National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the average value of the effective dose to exposed individuals in the United States has increased by a factor of 1.7 over the time period 1982–2006, with the contribution of medical exposures correspondingly increasing by a factor of 5.7. At present, medical contributors to effective dose include computed tomography (50% of total medical exposure), nuclear medicine (25%), interventional fluoroscopy (15%), and conventional radiography and diagnostic fluoroscopy (10%). An increased awareness of medical exposures has led to a gradual shift in the focus of radiation epidemiological studies from traditional occupational and environmental exposures to those focusing on cohorts of medical patients exposed to both diagnostic and therapeutic sources. The assignment of organ doses to patients in either a retrospective or a prospective study has increasingly relied on the use of computational anatomic phantoms. In this paper, we review the various methods and approaches used to construct patient models to include anthropometric databases, cadaver imaging, prospective volunteer imaging studies, and retrospective image reviews. Phantom format types—stylized, voxel, and hybrid—as well as phantom morphometric categories—reference, patient-dependent, and patient-specific—are next defined and discussed. Specific emphasis is given to hybrid phantoms—those defined through the use of combinations of polygon mesh and non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surfaces. The concept of a patient-dependent phantom is reviewed, in which phantoms of non-50th percentile heights and weights are designed from population-based morphometric databases and provided as a larger library of phantoms for patient matching and lookup of refined values of organ dose coefficients and/or radionuclide S values. We close with two brief examples of the use of hybrid phantoms in medical dose reconstruction—diagnostic nuclear medicine for pediatric subjects and interventional fluoroscopy for adult patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/coping/ccss.

  2. http://dceg.cancer.gov/reb/research/ionizing/medical/4.

  3. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.

  4. Anterior-posterior (AP), posterior-anterior (PA), left anterior oblique (LAO), and right anterior oblique (RAO).

References

  • Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK (2007) American college of radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athar BS, Paganetti H (2009) Neutron equivalent doses and associated lifetime cancer incidence risks for head & neck and spinal proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 54:4907–4926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BEIR (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII—phase 2. National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolch WE, Eckerman KF, Sgouros G, Thomas SR (2009) MIRD pamphlet no. 21—a generalized schema for radiopharmaceutical dosimetry: standardization of nomenclature. J Nucl Med 50:477–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caon M, Bibbo G, Pattison J (2000) Monte Carlo calculated effective dose to teenage girls from computed tomography examinations. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 90:445–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Clairand I, Bouchet LG, Ricard M, Durigon M, Di Paola M, Aubert B (2000) Improvement of internal dose calculations using mathematical models of different adult heights. Phys Med Biol 45:2771–2785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristy M (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristy M, Eckerman KF (1987) Specific absorbed fractions of energy at various ages from internal photon sources, ORNL TM-8381. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Grandmaison GL, Clairand I, Durigon M (2001) Organ weight in 684 adult autopsies: new tables for a Caucasoid population. Forensic Sci Int 119:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Endo A (2008) MIRD: radionuclide data and decay schemes. The Society of Nuclear Medicine, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Ryman JC (1993) Federal guidance report no. 12: external exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Wolbarst AB, Richardson ACB (1988) Federal guidance report no. 11: limiting values of radionuclide intake and air concentration and do)se conversion factors for inhalation, submersion, and ingestion. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Leggett RW, Nelson CB, Puskin JS, Richardson ACB (1999) Federal guidance report no. 13: cancer risk coefficients for environmentla exposure to radionuclides. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckerman KF, Poston JW, Bolch WE, Xu XG (2009) Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry. In: Xu XG, Eckerman KF (eds). Taylor & Francis, London, UK

  • Fontenot JD, Lee AK, Newhauser WD (2009) Risk of secondary malignant neoplasms from proton therapy and intensity-modulated x-ray therapy for early-stage prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:616–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall EJ (2006) Intensity-modulated radiation therapy, protons and the risk of second cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:1–7

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Han X (2008) Medical image segmentation using level set method and digital topology: concepts and new developments. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Han E, Bolch W, Eckerman K (2006) Revisions to the ORNL series of adult and pediatric computational phantoms for use with the MIRD schema. Health Phys 90:337–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimann T (2009) Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation. VDM Verlag, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintenlang DE, Moloney W, Winslow J (2009) Handbook of Anatomical Models for Radiation Dosimetry. In: Xu XG, Eckerman KF (eds). Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK

  • Hurtado JL, Lee C, Lodwick D, Geode T, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2009) Hybrid computational phantoms representing the reference adult male and adult female: Construction and applications to retrospective dosimetry. Health Phys (in press)

  • ICRP (2002) ICRP publication 89: basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection—reference values. Ann ICRP 32:1–277

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRP (2007) ICRP publication 103: recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 37:1–332

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRP (2009) Adult reference computational phantoms. Ann ICRP 39:1–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P, Whalen S, Wayson M, Juneja B, Lee C, Bolch W (2009) Hybrid patient-dependent phantoms covering statistical distributions of body morphometry in the US adult and pediatric population. Proc IEEE 97:2060–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P, Lee C, Johnson K, Siragusa D, Bolch W (2009) Influences of patient size on dose conversion coefficients: a hybrid phantom study for adult cardiac catheterization. Phys Med Biol 54:3613–3629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer R, Khoury HJ, Vieira JW, Lima VJ (2006) MAX06 and FAX06: update of two adult human phantoms for radiation protection dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 51:3331–3346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lee C, Park SH, Lee JK (2006a) Development of the two Korean adult tomographic computational phantoms for organ dosimetry. Med Phys 33:380–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lee C, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2006b) Whole-body voxel phantoms of paediatric patients—UF Series B. Phys Med Biol 51:4649–4661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lodwick D, Hasenauer D, Williams JL, Lee C, Bolch WE (2007) Hybrid computational phantoms of the male and female newborn patient: NURBS-based whole-body models. Phys Med Biol 52:3309–3333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee C, Lodwick D, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2008) Hybrid computational phantoms of the 15-year male and female adolescent: applications to CT organ dosimetry for patients of variable morphometry. Med Phys 35:2366–2382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCRP (2009) NCRP report no. 160: ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelowitz DB (2005) MCNPX user’s manual version 2.5.0. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston J, Bolch W, Bouchet L (2002) Mathematical models of human anatomy. In: Zaidi H, Sgouros G (eds) Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine: therapeutic applications. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, pp 108–132

  • Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG (1998) The visible human dataset: the anatomical platform for human simulation. Anat Rec 253:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stabin MG, Sparks RB, Crowe E (2005) OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 46:1023–1027

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper KA (1999) Bodybuilder. White Rock Science, White Rock, NM

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper KA, Spikes DL, McDowell RG (1996) Variable human anthropomorphic models. In: Cacciapouti RJ (ed) Advances and applications in radiation protection and shielding. American Nuclear Society, p 643

  • Veit R, Zankl M (1992) Influence of patient size on organ doses in diagnostic radiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 43:241–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalen S, Lee C, Williams JL, Bolch WE (2008) Anthropometric approaches and their uncertainties to assigning computational phantoms to individual patients in pediatric dosimetry studies. Phys Med Biol 53:453–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XG, Chao TC, Bozkurt A (2000) VIP-man: an image-based whole-body adult male model constructed from color photographs of the visible human project for multi-particle Monte Carlo calculations. Health Phys 78:476–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu XG, Taranenko V, Zhang J, Shi C (2007) A boundary-representation method for designing whole-body radiation dosimetry models: pregnant females at the ends of three gestational periods—RPI-P3, -P6 and -P9. Phys Med Biol 52:7023–7044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidi H, Xu XG (2007) Computational anthropomorphic models of the human anatomy: the path to realistic Monte Carlo modeling in radiological sciences. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:471–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zankl M (2009) The GSF voxel computational phantom family. In: Xu XG, Eckerman KF (eds) Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry. Taylor & Francis, London, UK

  • Zubal IG, Harrell CR, Smith EO, Rattner Z, Gindi G, Hoffer PB (1994) Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. Med Phys 21:299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesley Bolch.

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation given at the International Conference on Late Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation, 4–6 May 2009, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolch, W., Lee, C., Wayson, M. et al. Hybrid computational phantoms for medical dose reconstruction. Radiat Environ Biophys 49, 155–168 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-009-0260-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-009-0260-x

Keywords

Navigation