Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of scintigraphic defecography in the assessment of bowel function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of defecation in patients with ileal pouch for ulcerative colitis by using the mean of scintigraphic defecography.

Methods

Sixteen patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of good (group A) or poor (group B) pouch function. Emptying efficiency was calculated by scintigraphic defecography and measured as percentage of evacuation. This involves the use of up to 200 ml of an artificial stool made up of methyl cellulose paste labeled with 180 MBq of technetium-99 m (Tc-99 m) methylene diphosphonate. Potential causes of increased frequency in the absence of additional associated symptoms of dysfunction were excluded in all patients. Maximum tolerated volume (MTV) and balloon expulsion tests were also performed on all patients.

Results

No patient in both groups showed evidence of organic pouch dysfunction. Percentage of emptying was higher in patients of group A (n=6) than in group B (n=10) (81±9 vs 71±9%, respectively, P<0.05; correlation, −0.51, P<0.04). Mean MTV was similar in the two groups (group A: 361±118 ml and group B: 338±77 ml, P=0.7). Results of the balloon expulsion test were normal in all patients except for one individual in group B.

Conclusion

In patients with ileal pouch for ulcerative colitis, increased frequency of defecation without any evidence of pouch dysfunction may be correlated with an alteration of emptying efficiency. Scintigraphic defecography is appropriate to use for investigation of this condition with no disadvantages for the patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michelassi F, Lee J, Rubin M, Fichera A, Kasza K, Karrison T, Hurst RD (2003) Long-term functional results after ileal pouch anal restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a prospective observational study. Ann Surg 238(3):433–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kohler LW, Pemberton JH, Zinsmesister AR, Kelly KA (1991) Quality of life after proctocolectomy. A comparison of Brooke ileostomy, Kock pouch and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Gastroenterology 101:679–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg PA, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Morris G, Britton KE (1997) Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function. Gut 40:790–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindquist K, Liljeqvist L, Sellberg B (1984) The topography of ileoanal reservoirs in relation to evacuation patterns and clinical functions. Acta Chir Scand 150(7):573–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen B, Achkar JP, Lashner BA, Ormsby AH, Brzezinski A, Soffer EE, Remzi FH, Bevins CL, Fazio VW (2002) Irritable pouch syndrome: a new category of diagnosis for symptomatic patients with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Am J Gastroenterol 97(4):972–977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Halligan S, McGee S, Bartram CI (1994) Quantification of evacuation proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 37:190–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlbom U, Nilsson S, Pahlman L, Graf W (1999) Defecographic study of rectal evacuation in constipated patients and control subjects. Radiology 210:103–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hutchinson R, Mostafa AB, Grant EA, Smith NB, Deen KI, Harding LK, Kumar D (1993) Scintigraphic defecography: quantitative and dynamic assessment of anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 36(12):1132–1138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Connel PR, Kelly KA, Brown ML (1986) Scintigraphic assessment of neorectal function. J Nucl Med 27:460–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Loening-Baucke V, Metcalf AM, Savage C (1988) Are defecation dynamics important in the pathophysiology of severe idiopathic constipation? Gastroenterology 95:A878

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rao S (2001) Dyssynergic defecation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 30:97–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson-Fawcett MW, Jewell DP, McC Mortensen NJ (1997) Ileoanal reservoir dysfunction: a problem solving approach. Br J Surg 84:1351–1359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott NA, Pemberton JH, Barkel DC, Wolff BG (1989) Anal and ileal pouch manometric measurements before ileostomy closure are related to functional outcome after pouch–anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 76:613–616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ (1987) Restorative proctocolectomy: the four (W) reservoir. Br J Surg 74:564–566

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tuckson WB, Fazio VW (1991) Functional comparison between double and triple ileal loop pouches. Dis Colon Rectum 34:17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Selvaggi F, Giuliani A, Gallo C, Signoriello G, Riegler G, Canoinico S (2000) Randomized, controlled trial to compare the J-pouch and W-pouch configurations for ulcerative colitis in the maturation period. Dis Colon Rectum 43:615–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston D, Williamson MER, Lewis WG, Miller AS, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ (1996) Prospective controlled trial of duplicated (J) versus quadruplicated (W) pelvic ileal reservoirs in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Gut 39:242–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Groom JS, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ (1994) Relationship of small bowel motility to ileoanal reservoir function. Gut 35:523–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pizzamiglio M, Catalano C, Sarrantonio A, Pavone P, Pronio A, Montesani C, Ribotta G, Passariello R (1996) Restorative proctocolectomy: morphological and functional study with coronal CT. Abdom Imaging 21(3):261–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiristioglu I, Akbunar T, Kilic N, Ozel I, Alper E, Dogruyol H (2000) Quantitation of defecation function using radionuclide artificial stool in children with chronic constipation. Eur J Pediatr Surg 10(6):382–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nasmyth DG, Johnston D, Godwin PGR, Dixon MF, Smith A, Williams NS (1986) Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 73:469–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stryker SJ, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Dozois RR, Beart RW (1985) Neorectal function after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 72(Suppl):S76–S79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Williamson MER, Boyce JC, Miller AS, Lewis WG, Sagar PM, Holdsworth PJ, Smith AH, Johnston D (2000) The effect of pelvic ileal reservoir volume and antiperistaltic reflux on emptying efficiency. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1368–1374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Minguez M, Herreros B, Sanchiz V, Hernandez V, Almela P, Anon R, Mora F, Benages A (2004) Predictive value of the balloon expulsion test for excluding the diagnosis of pelvic floor dyssynergia in constipation. Gastroenterology 12:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selvaggi, F., Cuocolo, A., Giuliani, A. et al. The role of scintigraphic defecography in the assessment of bowel function after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. Int J Colorectal Dis 21, 448–452 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0036-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-005-0036-y

Keywords

Navigation