Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computed tomography of the small bowel in adult celiac disease: the jejunoileal fold pattern reversal

  • Abdominal radiology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The aim of this retrospective study was to establish whether the distinctive intestinal fold pattern of celiac disease (CD), known by barium studies as jejunoileal fold pattern reversal (JFPR) may be recognized at CT. The number of intestinal folds per 2.5 cm, seen at CT, were counted in the jejunum and in the ileum of 22 adult patients with CD and compared with the folds of 30 consecutive subjects in whom an intestinal disease had been excluded. The results were submitted to statistical analysis by Student's t-test. In the control group the number of folds per 2.5 cm were 4.88 (SD ± 0.78) in the jejunum and 2.84 ( ± 0.62) in the ileum; in the CD group the number of folds were 2.42 ( ± 1.61) in the jejunum and 5.11 ( ± 1.24) in the ileum. There was a statistically significant difference in the number of jejunal and ileal folds between the CD patients and the control group (in both cases p < 0.001). The JFPR was seen in 15 patients with CD (68.2 %) but in none of the controls. Our study shows that JFPR is not a normal finding and can be demonstrated by CT in the majority of patients with CD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 21 January 1999; Revised: 25 May 1999; Accepted: 26 May 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tomei, E., Marini, M., Messineo, D. et al. Computed tomography of the small bowel in adult celiac disease: the jejunoileal fold pattern reversal. Eur Radiol 10, 119–122 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050016

Navigation