Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) all have the potential to directly visualize local and distant relapse of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nevertheless, the role of diagnostic imaging for routine follow-up of CRC patients remains controversial. Although MRI and PET have advantages over CT in the detection of local recurrence, until now only a few surveillance programs recommend the use of annual CT for routine follow-up. The objective of this review is to elucidate the current status of diagnostic imaging for the detection of recurrent rectal cancer based on the recent literature and our own experience. Furthermore, an insight into contemporary surveillance programs and an outlook concerning a novel technical approach to moving-table MRI at 1.5 Tesla for staging purposes are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2
Fig. 3a–c
Fig. 4a, b
Fig. 5a–d
Fig. 6a–d
Fig. 7a–d
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al (2006) Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin 56:106–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jessup JM, Menk HR, Fremgen A et al (1997) Diagnosing colorectal carcinoma: clinical and molecular approaches. CA Cancer J Clin 47:70–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arriola E, Navarro M, Pares D et al (2006) Imaging techniques contribute to increased surgical rescue of relapse in the follow-up of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:478–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abir F, Alva S, Longo WE et al (2006) The postoperative surveillance of patients with colon cancer and rectal cancer. Am J Surg 192:100–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desch CE, Benson AB, Somerfield MR et al (2005) Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 23:8512–8519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kievit J (2002) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer: numbers needed to test and treat. Eur J Cancer 38:986–999

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abulafi AM, Williams NS (1994) Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 81:7–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Titu LV, Nicholson AA, Hartley JE et al (2006) Routine follow-up by magnetic resonance imaging does not improve detection of resectable local recurrences from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 243:348–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller AR (1998) Multidisciplinary management of recurrent colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol 7:209–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ (2001) The impact of recurrent rectal cancer on the quality of life. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:349–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Goldberg RM, Fleming TR, Tangen CM et al (1998) Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group , and the Southwest Oncology Group. Ann Intern Med 129:27–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huguier M, Houry S, Barrier A (2001) Local recurrence of cancer of the rectum. Am J Surg 182:437–439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Cohen AM et al (2005) Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg 241:829–838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Longo WE, Johnson FE (2002) The preoperative assessment and postoperative surveillance of patients with colon and rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82:1091–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giordano P, Efron J, Vernava AM et al (2006) Strategies of follow-up for colorectal cancer: a survey of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Tech Coloproctol 10:199–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R et al (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 41:1127–1133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D et al (2002) Efficacy and cost of risk-adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. J Surg Oncol 28:418–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062–1067

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H et al (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma: randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 38:619–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C et al (1997) A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:666–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L et al (1998) Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114:7–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J et al (2003) Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer 3:26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeffery GM, Hickey BE, Hider P (2002) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Library (CD002200), Oxford

  25. Chau I, Allen MJ, Cunningham D et al (2004) The value of routine serum carcino-embryonic antigen measurement and computed tomography in the surveillance of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1420–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cutait R, Alves VA, Lopes LC et al (1991) Restaging of colorectal cancer based on the identification of lymph node micrometastases through immunoperoxidase staining of CEA and cytokeratins. Dis Colon Rectum 34:917–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Carl J, Bentzen SM, Norgaard-Pedersen B et al (1993) Modelling of serial carcinoembryonic antigen changes in colorectal cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 53:751–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of colon cancer. Ann Oncol 16:16–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:18–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ESMO Guidelines Task Force (2005) ESMO minimum clinical recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of rectal cancer. Ann Oncol 16:20–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bleeker WA, Mulder NH, Hermans J et al (2001) Value and cost of follow-up after adjuvant treatment of patients with Dukes’ C colonic cancer. Br J Surg 88:101–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tepper JE, O’Connell M, Niedzwiecki D et al (2002) Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control-final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol 20:1744–1750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schaefer JF, Schlemmer H-PW (2006) Total-body MRI in oncology. Eur Radiol 16:2000–2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Stueckle CA, Haegele KF, Jendreck M et al (2005) Improvements in detection of rectal cancer recurrence by multiplanar reconstruction. Radiologe 45:930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stueckle CA, Adams S, Stueckle KF et al (2006) Multi-detector CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrence of rectal cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 5:285–289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Blomqvist L, Holm T, Goranson H et al (1996) MR imaging, CT and CEA scintigraphy in diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Acta Radiol 37:779–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pema PJ, Bennett WF, Bova JG et al (1994) CT vs MRI in diagnosis of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. J Comp Assist Tomogr 18:256–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Castells A, Bessa X, Daniels M et al (1998) Value of postoperative surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 41:714–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Deveney KE, Way LW (1984) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 148:717–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Stoker J, Rociu E, Wiersma TG et al (2000) Imaging of anorectal disease. Br J Surg 87:10–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Markus J, Morrissey B, deGara C et al (1997) MRI of recurrent rectosigmoid carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 22:338–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Torricelli P, Pecchi A, Luppi G et al (2003) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI with dynamic evaluation in diagnosing the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 28:19–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dicle O, Obuz F, Cakmakci H (1999) Differentiation of recurrent rectal cancer and scarring with dynamic MR imaging. Br J Radiol 72:1155–1159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Akhurst T, Larson SM (1999) Positron emission tomography imaging of colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 26:577–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fukunaga H, Sekimoto M, Ikeda M et al (2004) Fusion image of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 12:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huebner RH, Park KC, Shepherd JE et al (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole-body FDG PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gearhart SL, Frassica D, Rosen R et al (2005) Improved staging with pretreatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography in low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 13:397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moore HG, Akhurst T, Larson SM et al (2003) A case-controlled study of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the detection of pelvic recurrence in previously irradiated rectal cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 197:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H et al (2004) Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 232:815–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF (2006) Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 238:405–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kamel IR, Cohade C, Neyman E et al (2004) Incremental value of CT in PET/CT of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:663–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bhattacharjya S, Bhattacharjya T, Baber S et al (2004) Prospective study of contrast-enhanced computed tomography, computed tomography during arterioportography, and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of colorectal liver metastases for liver resection. Br J Surg 91:1361–1369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Both M et al (2002) Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 224:748–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EFI et al (2005) Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis—meta-analysis. Radiology 237:123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P et al (2005) High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system. Invest Radiol 40:743–753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. MERCURY Study Group (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ, DOI 10.1136/bmj.3897.646400.55

  57. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJM et al (2004) Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging-a meta-analysis. Radiology 232:773–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M (2006) Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol 17:379–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Brown G (2005) Thin section MRI in multidisciplinary pre-operative descision making for patients with rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 78:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kim CK, Kim SH, Chun HK et al (2006) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: accuracy of 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 16:972–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Torkzad MR, Hansson KA, Lindholm J et al (2006) Significance of mesorectal volume in staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of involvement of the mesorectal fascia. Eur Radiol [Epub ahead of print]

  62. Torkzad MR, Blomqvist L (2005) The mesorectum: morphometric assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15:1184–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fautz H-P, Kannengiesser SAR (2006) Sliding multislice (SMS): a new technique for minimum FOV usage in axial continously moving-table acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 55:363–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Ludwig U, Sommer G, Zaitsev M et al (2006) 2D axial moving table acquisitions with dynamic slice adaption. Magn Reson Med 55:423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Sommer G, Fautz H-P, Ludwig U et al (2006) Multicontrast sequences with continuous table motion: a novel acquisition technique for extended field of view imaging. Magn Reson Med 55:918–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Chassin MR, Galwin RW (1998) The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health care Quality. JAMA 280:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Feiburg, Hugstetter Strasse 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany

    O. Schaefer & M. Langer

Authors
  1. O. Schaefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Langer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Schaefer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schaefer, O., Langer, M. Detection of recurrent rectal cancer with CT, MRI and PET/CT. Eur Radiol 17, 2044–2054 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0613-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0613-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation