Abstract.
The objective of this study was to evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (d-MRI) as a prognostic indicator of lumbar vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. d-MRI of the lumbar spine was performed in ten patients with multiple myeloma. A fast gradient echo sequence (turbo fast low-angle shot, two-dimensional) was used, together with controlled bolus injection of gadolinium diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA). The maximum increase in signal intensity [amplitude (A), arbitrary units (a.u.)] was assessed for each lumbar vertebra. About half a year later (median: 6.2 months) magnetic resonance imaging was repeated to detect new fractures. Amplitudes of vertebrae which fractured after the initial d-MRI were compared with amplitudes of vertebrae which did not fracture during follow-up. Six of ten patients (7 of 50 lumbar vertebrae) showed new fractures. Five patients fractured one vertebra each, whereas one patient had several vertebrae involved. The initial d-MRI showed significantly higher amplitudes (p<0.0001) in those vertebrae that subsequently fractured (A: 33.1±8.1 vs 16.7±4.2). On retrospective analysis, a cutoff level of 25 a.u. discriminated without overlap between vertebrae that fractured during follow-up and those which did not. The maximum increase in signal intensity (the amplitude) on d-MRI appears to be a prognostic marker capable of predicting vertebral fractures of the lumbar spine in patients with multiple myeloma. d-MRI may therefore be helpful in identifying patients who might benefit from localized radiation therapy or surgical intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Electronic Publication
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scherer, .A., Wittsack, .HJ., Strupp, .C. et al. Vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma: first results of assessment of fracture risk using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Hematol 81, 517–521 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-002-0532-x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-002-0532-x