Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cervical carcinoma: role of imaging

  • Update
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wingo PA, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics 1995. CA: Cancer J Clin 1995;45:8–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer facts and figures, 1994. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1994:15

  3. Gusberg SB, Runowicz CD. Gynecologic cancers. In: Holleb AI, Fink DJ, Murphy GP, eds. American Cancer Society textbook of clinical oncology. Atlanta: ACS, 1991:481–497

    Google Scholar 

  4. LaVecchia C, Franceshi S, DeCarli A, et al. “Pap” smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: quantitative estimates from a casecontrol study. Lancet 1984;2:779–782

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olesen F. A case control study of cervical cancer in Denmark. Int J Epidemiol 1988;17:501–508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink DJ. Change in American Cancer Society checkup guidelines for detection of cervical cancer. CA: Cancer J Clin 1988;38:127–128

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fink DJ. Cancer detection: the cancer-related checkup guidelines. In: Holleb AI, Fink DJ, Murphy GP, eds. American Cancer Society textbook of clinical oncology. Atlanta: ACS, 1991:153–176

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koss LG, Stewart FW, Foote FW. Some histological aspects of behavior of epidermoid carcinoma in situ and related lesions of the uterine cervix. Cancer 1963;16:1160–1211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Burghardt E, Girard F. Cervical cancer: local spread. In: Burghard E, Webb MJ, Monoghan JM, Kinderman G, eds. Surgical gynecological oncology. New York: Thieme, 1993:203–212

    Google Scholar 

  10. Creasman WT. New gynecologic cancer staging. Gynecol Oncol 1995;58:157–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burghart E, Hofmann HMH, Ebner F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer: a basis for objective classification. Gynecol Oncol 1989;33:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hricak H, Quivey JM, Campos Z, Gildengorin V, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: predictive value of clinical and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in assessment of prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:791–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dargent D, Frobert JL, Beau G. V factor (tumor volume) and T factor (FIGO classification) in the assessment of cervix cancer prognosis: the risk of lymph node spread. Gynecol Oncol 1985;22:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dattoli MJ, Gretz HF III, Beller U, et al. Analysis of multiple prognostic factors in patients with stage IB cervical cancer: age as a major determinant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989;17:41–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Nagell JR, Donaldson ES, Parker JC, et al. The prognostic significance of cell type and lesion size in patients with cervical cancer treated by radical surgery. Gynecol Oncol 1977;5:142–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Averette HE, Ford JH, Dudan RC, et al. Staging of cervical cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1975;18:215–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Nagell JR, Roddick JW Jr, Lowin DM. The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findings. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1971;110:973–978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sevin Bu, Averette HE. Staging laparotomy and radical hysterectomy for cancer of the cervix. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynecol 1988;2:761–768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karlan BY, Lagasse LD. Surgical staging. In: Burghard E, Webb MJ, Monoghan JM, Kinderman G, eds. Surgical gynecological oncology. New York: Thieme, 1993:241

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abitol MM, Davenport JH. Sexual dysfunction after therapy for cervical carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974;119:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mendenhall WM, Sombeck MD, Freeman DE. Stage IB and IIAB carcinoma of the intact uterine cervix: impact of tumor volume and the role of adjuvant hysterectomy. Semin Radiat Oncol 1994;4:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Russel I. The evaluation of computerized tomography: a review of research methods. In: Culyer AJ, Horisberger B, eds. Economic and medical evaluation of health care technologies. New York: Springer, 1983:298–316

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Innocenti P, Pulli F, Savino L, et al. Staging of cervical cancer: reliability of transrectal US. Radiology 1992;185:201–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Carter JR, Carson LF, Twiggs LB. Gynecologic oncology. In: Nyberg DA, Hill LM, Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson E, eds. Transvaginal ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book, 1992: 241–264

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gitsch G, Deutinger J, Rheinthaller A, et al. Cervical cancer: the diagnostic value of rectosonography for the judgement of parametrial invasion in regard of inflammatory stromal reaction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993;100:696–697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cobby M, Browning J, Jones A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endosonography in the local staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Br J Radiol 1990;63:673–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernaschek G, Deutinger J, Bartl W, et al. Endosonographic staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Arch Gynecol 1986;239:21–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carter J, Carson LF, Elg S. Transvaginal sonography as an aid in the clinical staging of carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Ultrasound 1992;20:283–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuhara A, Akamatsu N, Sekiba K. Use of transrectal radial scan ultrasonography in evaluating the extent of uterine cervical cancer. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15:507–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levenback C, Dershaw DD, Rubin SC. Endoluminal ultrasound staging of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Iwamoto K, Kigawa J, Minagawa Y, et al. Transvaginal ultrasonographic diagnosis of bladder wall invasion in patients with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:217–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sanders RC, McNeil BJ, Finberg HJ, et al. A prospective study of computed tomography and ultrasound in the detection and staging of pelvic masses. Radiology 1983;146:439–442

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Magee BJ, Logue JP, Swindell R, et al. Tumor size as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the cervix: assessment by transrectal ultrasound. Br J Radiol 1991;64:812–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Walsh JW. Computed tomography of gynecologic neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:817–830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee JKT, Marx MV. Pelvis. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RS, eds. Computed body tomography, 2nd ed. New York: Raven, 1989:851–897

    Google Scholar 

  36. Walsh JW, Goplerud DR. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma. AJR 1981;137:997–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Grumbine FC, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA, et al. Abdominopelvic computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1981;12:286–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kilcheski TS, Arger PH, Mulher CB Jr, et al. Role of computed tomography in the presurgical evaluation of the cervix. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1981;5:378–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Villasanta U, Whitley NO, Haney PJ, et al. Computed tomography in invasive carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:218–224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vick CW, Walsh JW, Wheelock JB, et al. CT of the normal and abnormal parametria in cervical cancer. AJR 1984;143:597–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim SH, Choi Bi, Lee HP, et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of MRI and CT findings. Radiology 1990;175:45–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK, et al. Preoperative staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:633–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Carrington B, Hricak H. The uterus and vagina. In: Hricak H, Carrington B, eds. MRI of the pelvis: a text atlas. London: Martin Dunitz, 1991:104–108

    Google Scholar 

  44. Togashi K, Nishimura J, Sago T, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: staging with MR imaging. Radiology 1989;171:245–251

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ebner F. Magnetic resonance imaging. In: Burghard E, Webb MJ, Monoghan JM, Kinderman G, eds. Surgical gynecological oncology. New York: Thieme, 1993:244–248

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sironi S, Belloni C, Tacchagni G, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1991;180:719–724

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hricak H, Hamm B, Semelka RC, et al. Carcinoma of the uterus: use of gadopentetate dimeglumine in MR imaging. Radiology 1991;181:95–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sironi S, Delobilli F, Scarfone G, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness. Radiology 1993;188:797–801

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hricak H, Lacey CG, Sandles LG, et al. Invasive cervical carcinoma: comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings. Radiology 1988;166:623–631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Greco A, Mason P, Leung AWL, et al. Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix: MRI surgical correlation. Clin Radiol 1980;40:401–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. R. Forstner

    Present address: Zentralröntgeninstitut, LKA, Salzburg, Austria

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, Box 0628, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0628, USA

    K. K. Yu, R. Forstner & H. Hricak

Authors
  1. K. K. Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Forstner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. Hricak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, K.K., Forstner, R. & Hricak, H. Cervical carcinoma: role of imaging. Abdom Imaging 22, 208–215 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900174

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900174

Key words

Search

Navigation