Skip to main content
Log in

Prospective comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the spine in the diagnosis of haematogenous spondylodiscitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively compare 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of haematogenous spondylodiscitis

Methods

The study included 26 patients (12 women, 14 men; mean age 59 ± 17 years) with clinical symptoms of infection of the spine. Patients who had had prior spinal surgery or any type of antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months were excluded from the study. Whole-body PET/CT 60 min after injection of 4.07 MBq/kg of 18F-FDG and an MRI scan of the spine was performed in all patients. SUVmax in an area surrounding the lesions with the suspicion of infection as well as a background SUVmean in a preserved area of the spine were calculated for quantification. Infection was diagnosed by microbiological documentation in cultures of image-guided spinal puncture fluid or blood. Infection was excluded if symptoms were absent without antimicrobial therapy during a follow-up of at least 6 months.

Results

Spondylodiscitis was confirmed in 18 of the 26 patients. Staphylococcus aureus was found in 8 patients, Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 4, Escherichia coli in 2 and other pathogens in 4. Of the remaining 8 patients, the diagnoses were degenerative spondyloarthropathy in 5 and vertebral fracture in 3. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were 83 %, 88 %, 94 % and 70 % for 18F-FDG PET/CT, and 94 %, 38 %, 77 % and 75 % for MRI, respectively. The accuracies of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI were similar (84 % and 81 %, respectively). The combination of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI detected the infection in 100 % of the patients with spondylodiscitis. 18F-FDG uptake, quantified in terms of SUVmax corrected by the background SUVmean, was significantly higher in patients with spondylodiscitis than in those without infection (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Due to its high specificity, 18F-FDG PET/CT should be considered as a first-line imaging procedure in the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. Quantification of uptake in terms of SUVmax was able to discriminate infection of the spine from other processes in this series of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cottle L, Riordan T. Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect. 2008;56:401–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan IA, Vaccaro AR, Zlotolow DA. Management of vertebral diskitis and osteomyelitis. Orthopedics. 1999;22:758–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Varma R, Lander P, Assaf A. Imaging of pyogenic infectious spondylodiscitis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2001;39:203–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hopkinson N, Stevenson J, Benjamin S. A case ascertainment study of septic discitis: clinical, microbiological and radiological features. Q J Med. 2001;94:465–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. An HS, Seldomridge JA. Spinal infections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;444:27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jung NY, Jee WH, Ha KY, Park CK, Byun JY. Discrimination of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182:1405–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SH, Choi JY, Lee JW, Kim NR, Choi JA, Kang HS. MR imaging assessment of the spine: infection or an imitation? Radiographics. 2009;29:599–612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Modic MT, Feiglin DH, Piraino DW, Boumphrey F, Weinstein MA, Duchesneau PM, et al. Vertebral osteomyelitis: Assessment using MR. Radiology. 1985;157:157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gemmel F, Rijk PC, Collins JM, Parlevliet T, Stumpe KD, Palestro CJ. Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:540–51.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ito K, Kubota K, Morooka M, Hasuo K, Kuroki H, Mimori A. Clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the management and diagnosis of infectious spondylitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:691–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Treglia G, Focacci C, Caldarella C, Mattoli MV, Salsano M, Taralli S, et al. The role of nuclear medicine in the diagnosis of spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16:20–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gratz S, Dörner J, Oestmann JW, Opitz M, Behr T, Meller J, et al. 67Ga-citrate and 99Tcm-MDP for estimating the severity of vertebral osteomyelitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:111–1120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adatepe MH, Powell OM, Isaacs GH, Nichols K, Cefola R. Hematogenous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: diagnostic value of radionuclide bone imaging. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:1680–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fuster D, Sola O, Soriano A, Monegal A, Setoain X, Tomas X, et al. A prospective study comparing whole-body FDG PET/CT to combined planar bone scan with 67Ga SPECT/CT in the diagnosis of spondylodiskitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2012;37:827–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stumpe KD, Zanetti M, Weishaupt D, Hodler J, Boos N, Von Schultness GK. FDG positron emission tomography for differentiation of degenerative and infectious endplate abnormalities in the lumbar spine detected on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Winter F, Gemmel F, Van De Wiele C, Poffijn B, Uyttendaele D, Dierckx R. 18-Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of infection in the postoperative spine. Spine. 2003;28:1314–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guhlmann A, Brecht-Krauss D, Suger G, Glatting G, Kotzerke J, Kinzl L, et al. Fluorine-18-FDG PET and technetium-99m antigranulocyte antibody scintigraphy in chronic osteomyelitis. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:2145–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmitz A, Kälicke T, Willkomm P, Grünwald F, Kandyba J, Schmitt O. Use of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in assessing the process of tuberculous spondylitis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:541–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vanninen E, Laitinen T, Partanen K, Tulla H, Herno A, Kröger H. Late correlative imaging findings of previous acute infective spondylitis. Clin Nucl Med. 2000;25:779–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Skanjeti A, Penna D, Douroukas A, Cistaro A, Arena V, Leo G, et al. PET in the clinical work-up of patients with spondylodiscitis: a new tool for the clinician? Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;56:569–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gratz S, Dörner J, Fischer U, Behr T, Béhé M, Altenvoerde G, et al. 18F-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002;29:516–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hungenbach S, Delank KS, Dietlein M, Eysel P, Drzezga A, Schmidt MC. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake pattern in patients with suspected spondylodiscitis. Nucl Med Commun. 2013;34:1068–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheung WY, Luk KD. Pyogenic spondylitis. Int Orthop. 2012;36:397–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohtori S, Suzuki M, Koshi T, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET for patients with suspected spondylitis showing Modic change. Spine. 2010;15:1599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Domínguez ML, Lorente R, Rayo JI, Serrano J, Sanchez R, Infante JR, et al. SPECT-CT with 67Ga-citrate in the management of spondylodiscitis. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2012;31:34–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by AGAUR 2009 SGR 1049.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Fuster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fuster, D., Tomás, X., Mayoral, M. et al. Prospective comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the spine in the diagnosis of haematogenous spondylodiscitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 42, 264–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2898-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2898-0

Keywords

Navigation