Abstract
Purpose
No data is available on the different FDG PET and CT findings in the lymph nodes (LN) of patients with HIV and tuberculosis (TB) who respond compared with those who do not respond to anti-TB treatment by 4 months after initiation of TB treatment. These findings were the focus of our study.
Methods
PET/CT scans performed at 4 months after initiation of TB treatment in 20 consecutive HIV patients were analysed. SUVmax values were obtained for all regions of LN involvement. The diameter of the LNs was measured and the CT enhancement (LNs showing peripheral rim enhancement with central low attenuation, PRECLO, in comparison with homogeneously involved LNs) and the calcification patterns of involved LNs assessed. The relationship between the PET and CT findings and the clinical outcome, response or nonresponse, was evaluated.
Results
FDG PET identified 91 sites of LN involvement, 20 of which were not identified by CT. SUVmax values were significantly higher in nonresponders (8 patients, SUVmax 11.2 ± 4.0, mean ± SD) when compared to responders (12 patients, SUVmax 2.6 ± 2.3; p = 0.0001). In ROC analysis (AUC 0.952) a cut-off value of 4.5 for SUVmax yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 95 % and 85 % for discriminating nonresponding from responding LNs. LNs were significantly larger in nonresponders (1.9 ± 0.4 cm) than in responders (1.4 ± 0.4 cm; p = 0.0001); the AUC in the ROC analysis was 0.76. PRECLO LNs were significantly larger (2.2 ± 0.3 cm) than homogeneous involved LN basins (1.5 ± 0.4 cm) and LN basins with calcification (1.4 ± 0.5 cm; p = 0.001). Using the presence of at least one LN basin with PRECLO as a criterion for nonresponse, responders could be separated from nonresponders with a sensitivity of 88 % and a specificity of 66 %.
Conclusion
LNs responding to TB treatment could be differentiated from nonresponding LNs with a sensitivity and specificity of 95 % and 85 % using a SUVmax cut-off value of 4.5 and a sensitivity and specificity of 88 % and 66 % using the presence of at least one LN basin with PRECLO.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arciniegas W, Orjuela D. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a review of 102 cases in Pereira, Colombia. Biomedica. 2006;26:71–80.
Golden M, Vikram H. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:1761–8.
Sharma S, Mohan A. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Indian J Med Res. 2004;120:316–53.
De Backer A, Mortele K, Deeren D, Vanschoubroeck J, De Keulenaer B. Abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy: MRI features. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2104–9.
Pombo F, Rodriguez E, Mato J, Perez-Fontan J, Rivera E, Valvuena L. Patterns of contrast enhancement of tuberculous lymph nodes demonstrated by computed tomography. Clin Radiol. 1992;46:13–7.
Akhan O, Pringot J. Imaging of abdominal tuberculosis. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:312–23.
Golden M, Holenarasipur V. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:1761–8.
Andrea J, Caceres J, Pallisa E, Martinez-Rodriguez M. Radiological manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur J Radiol. 2004;51:139–49.
Itoh H, Shim Y, Lee J, Ahn J, Han M, Noma S. Pulmonary tuberculosis: CT findings – early active disease and sequential changes with antituberculous therapy. Radiology. 1993;186:653–60.
Sathekge M, Maes A, Kgomo M, Stoltz A, Pottel H, Van de Wiele C. Impact of FDG PET imaging on the management of tuberculosis treatment: a pilot study. Nuklearmedizin. 2010;49:35–40.
Matsui T, Nakata N, Nagai A, Takahashi M, Momose T, Ohtomo K, Koyasu S. Inflammatory cytokines and hypoxia contribute to 18F-FDG uptake by cells involved in pannus formation in rheumatoid arthritis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:920–6.
Alavi A, Gupta J, Alberini M, Hickeson L, Adam E, Bhargava P, Zhuang H. Positron emission tomography in non-malignant thoracic disorders. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32:293–321.
Paik J, Lee K, Choe S, Choi Y, Kim B. Augmented 18F-FDG uptake in activated monocytes occurs during the priming process and involves tyrosine kinases and protein-kinase C. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:124–8.
Davis S, Nuermberger E, Um P, Vidal C, Jedynak B, Pomper M, Bishai W, Jain S. Noninvasive pulmonary [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography correlates with bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drug treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;11:4879–84.
American Thoracic Society; CDC; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Treatment of tuberculosis. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52(RR-11):1–77.
Schluger N. Keystone Symposia on Tuberculosis: from lab research to field trials (C6), abstract 041. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 20–25 March 2007.
Van Deun A, Martin A, Palomino JC. Diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis: reliability and rapidity of detection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:131–40.
Ahmad S, Mokaddas E. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Respir Med. 2009;103:1777–90.
Long R. Smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in industrialized countries. Chest 2001;120:330–4.
Mendelson M. Diagnosing tuberculosis in HIV-infected patients: challenges and future prospects. Br Med Bull. 2007;81–82:149–65.
Sathekge M, Maes A, Kgomo M, Pottel H, Stolz A, Van de Wiele C. FDG uptake in lymph nodes of HIV+ and tuberculosis patients: implications for cancer staging. Q J Nucl Med. 2010;6:698–703.
Moon WK, Im JG, Yeon KM, Han MC. Mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis: CT findings of active and inactive disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:715–8.
Je B, Kim M, Kim S, Park D, Kim T, Lee N. Detailed nodal features of cervical tuberculous lymphadenitis on serial neck computed tomography before and after chemotherapy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:889–94.
Prasoon D. Acid-fast bacilli in fine needle aspiration smears from tuberculous lymph nodes. Acta Cytol. 2000;44:297–300.
Conflicts of Interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sathekge, M., Maes, A., D’Asseler, Y. et al. Tuberculous lymphadenitis: FDG PET and CT findings in responsive and nonresponsive disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39, 1184–1190 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2115-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2115-y