Skip to main content
Log in

The potential pitfalls of low-activity protocols in PET/CT imaging

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig 2

References

  1. Murray I, Kalemis A, Glennon J, Hasan S, Quraishi S, Beyer T, et al. Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:1643–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mawlawi O, Townsend DW. Multimodality imaging: an update on PET/CT technology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:S15–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber WA, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;37:181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weber WA. Assessing tumor response to therapy. J Nucl Med 2009;50:S1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garry McDermott.

Additional information

A reply to this letter can be found at doi 10.1007/s00259-010-1648-1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDermott, G., Iball, G. & Scarsbrook, A. The potential pitfalls of low-activity protocols in PET/CT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 38, 185–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1649-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-010-1649-0

Keywords

Navigation