Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Respiratory motion handling is mandatory to accomplish the high-resolution PET destiny

  • Editorial Commentary
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Reference

  1. Zaidi H. Recent developments and future trends in nuclear medicine instrumentation. Z Med Phys 2006;16:5–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tawileh M. Development of an optimal external device for respiratory gating in nuclear medicine [PhD thesis in progress].

  3. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Squire OD, Braban LE, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on reducing lung motion artifacts in PET imaging of lung cancer. Med Phys 2002;29:366–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2002;43:876–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weber WA, Ziegler SI, Thödtmann R, Hanauske AR, Schwaiger M. Reproducibility of metabolic measurements in malignant tumors using FDG PET. J Nucl Med 1999;40:1771–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eschmann SM, Friedel G, Paulsen F, Reimold M, Hehr T, Budach W, et al. 18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nahmias C, Hanna WT, Wahl LM, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Towsend DW. Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:744–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wade OL. Movements of the thoracic cage and diaphragm in respiration. J Physiol 1954;124:193–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Towsend DW, Caney JPJ, Yap JT, Hall NC. PET/CT today and tomorrow. J Nucl Med 2004;45:4S–14S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vogel WV, Oyen WJ, Barentsz JO, Kaanders JH, Corstens FH. PET/CT panacea, redundancy, or something in between. J Nucl Med 2004;45:15S–24S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blodgett TM, Casagranda B, Towsend DW, Meltzer CC. Issues, controversies, and clinical utility of combined PET/CT imaging: what is the interpreting physician facing. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:S138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wiley C. Disruptive technology: the conflict over PET/CT. Imaging Economics 2005;18:17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alavi A, Mavi A, Basu S, Fischman A. Is PET–CT the only option? [editorial]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:819–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xing L, Wessels B. The value of PET/CT is being over-sold as a clinical tool in radiation oncology. Med Phys 2005;32:1457–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaidi H. The quest for the ideal anato-molecular imaging fusion tool. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2006;2:e47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Beyer T, Townsend D. Putting ‘clear’ into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:857–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, Seifert B, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu TH, Huang YH, Lee JJ, Wang SY, Wang SC, Su CT, et al. Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004;31:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Goerres GW, Burger C, Kamel E, Seifert B, Kaim AH, Buck A, et al. Respiration-induced attenuation artifact at PET/CT: technical considerations. Radiology 2003;226:906–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL. Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:603–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Papathanassiou D, Becker S, Amir R, Menéroux B, Liehn JC. Respiratory motion artifacts in the liver dome on FDG PET/CT: comparison of attenuation correction with CT and a caesium external source. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1422–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gould KL, Pan T, Loghin C, Johnson NP, Guha A, Sdringola S. Frequent diagnostic errors in cardiac PET/CT due to misregistration of CT attenuation and emission PET images: a definitive analysis of causes, consequences, and corrections. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1112–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Goetze S, Brown TL, Lavely WC, Zhang Z, Bengel FM. Attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT: effects of misregistration and value of reregistration. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1090–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pan T, Mawlawi O, Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Luo D, Liu HH, et al. Attenuation correction of PET images with respiration-averaged CT images in PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2005;46:1481–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Goerres G, Buehler TC, Burger C, Steinert HC, von Schulthess GK. CT based attenuation correction using a combined PET/CT scanner: Influence of the respiration level on measured FDG concentration in normal tissues. J Nucl Med 2002;43:887.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beyer T, Antoch G, Muller S, Egelhof T, Freudenberg LS, Debatin J, et al. Acquisition protocol considerations for combined PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2004;45:25S–35S.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Blodgett TM, McCook BM, Federle MP. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography: protocol issues and options. Semin Nucl Med 2006;36:157–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schafers KP, Raupach R, Beyer T. Combined 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of the head and neck: an approach to metal artifact correction. Nuklearmedizin 2006;45:219–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nahmias C, Lemmens C, Faul D, Carlson E, Long M, Blodgett T, et al. Does reducing CT artifacts from dental implants influence the PET interpretation in PET/CT studies of oral cancer and head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1047–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmadian A, Ay MR, Bidgoli JH, Sarkar S, Zaidi H. Correction of oral contrast artifacts in CT-based attenuation correction of PET images using an automated segmentation algorithm. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008 (in press).

  31. Mirzaei S, Guerchaft M, Bonnier C, Knoll P, Doat M, Braeutigam P. Use of segmented CT transmission map to avoid artifacts in PET images by a PET-CT device. BMJ Nucl Med 2005;5:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McCord ME, Bacharach SL, Bonow RO, Dilsizian V, Cuocolo A, Freedman N. Misalignment between PET transmission and emission scans—its effect on myocardial imaging. J Nucl Med 1992;33:1209–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pevsner A, Nehmeh SA, Humm JL, Mageras GS, Erdi YE. Effect of motion on tracer activity determination in CT attenuation corrected PET images: A lung phantom study. Med Phys 2005;32:2358–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Mageras G, et al. The CT motion quantitation of lung lesions and its impact on PET-measured SUVs. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1287–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Goerres GW, Kamel E, Heidelberg TNH, Schwitter MR, Burger C, von Schulthess GK. PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002;29:351–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Beyer T, Antoch G, Blodgett T, Freudenberg LF, Akhrust T, Mueller S. Dual modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:588–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sarikaya I, Yeung HW, Erdi Y, Larson SM. Respiratory artifact causing malpositioning of liver dome lesion in right lower lung. Clin Nucl Med 2003;28:943–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Nakatomo Y, Chin BB, Cohade C, Osman M, Tatsumi M, Wahl RL. PET/CT: artifacts caused by bowel motion. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25:221–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Osman MM, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Marshall LT, Leal JP, Wahl RL. Clinically significant inaccurate localization of lesions with PET/CT: frequency in 300 patients. J Nucl Med 2003;44:240–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cohade C, Osman M, Marshall LN, Wahl RN. PET/CT: accuracy of PET and CT spatial registration of lung lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:721–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li T, Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, Xing L. Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET. Med Phys 2006;33:1288–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Klein GJ, Reutter RW, Huesman RH. Four-dimensional affine registration models for respiratory-gated PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 2001;48:756–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thorndyke B, Schreibmann E, Koong A, Xing L. Reducing respiratory motion artifacts in positron emission tomography through retrospective stacking. Med Phys 2006;33:2632–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Menke M, Atkins MS, Buckley KR. Compensation methods for head motion detected during PET imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1996;43:310–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Qiao F, Pan T, Clark JW Jr, Mawlawi OR. A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:3769–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Qiao F, Pan T, Clark JW, Mawlawi OR. Region of interest motion compensation for PET image reconstruction. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:2675–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Qiao F, Pan T, Clark JW Jr, Mawlawi O. Joint model of motion and anatomy for PET image reconstruction. Med Phys 2007;34:4626–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lamare F, Ledesma Carbayo MJ, Cresson T, Kontaxakis G, Santos A, Le Rest CC, et al. List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:5187–204.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Fin L, Daouk J, Morvan J, Bailly P, El Esper I, Saidi L, Meyer M-E. Initial clinical results for breath-hold CT-based processing of respiratory-gated PET acquisitions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008 doi:10.1007/s00259-008-0858-2.

  50. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Pan T, Pevsner A, Rosenzweig KE, Yorke E, et al. Four-dimensional (4D) PET/CT imaging of the thorax. Med Phys 2004;31:3179–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Boucher L, Rodrigue S, Lecomte R, Bénard F. Respiratory gating for 3-dimensional PET of the thorax: Feasability and initial results. J Nucl Med 2004;45:214–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Allen-Auerbach M, Yeom K, Park J, Phelps M, Czernin J. Standard PET/CT of the chest during shallow breathing is inadequate for comprehensive staging of lung cancer. J Nucl Med 2006;47:298–301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pan T, Lee TY, Rietzel E, Chen GT. 4D-CT imaging of a volume influenced by respiratory motion on multislice CT. Med Phys 2004;31:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alessio AM, Kohlmyer S, Branch K, Chen G, Caldwell J, Kinahan P. Cine CT for attenuation correction in Cardiac PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2007;48:794–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chi PC, Mawlawi O, Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Balter PA, Luo D, et al. Design of respiration averaged CT for attenuation correction of the PET data from PET/CT. Med Phys 2007;34:2039–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Slomka PJ, Dey D, Pzetak C, Aladi UE, Baum RP. Automated 3-dimensional registration of stand-alone 18F-FDG whole-body PET with CT. J Nucl Med 2003;44:1156–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. de Juan R, Seifert B, Berthold T, Von Schulthess GK, Goerres GW. Clinical evaluation of a breathing protocol for PET/CT. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1118–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Meirelles GS, Squire O, Larson SM, Humm JL, et al. Deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT of the thorax. J Nucl Med 2006;48:22–6.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nagel CC, Bosmans G, Dekker AL, Ollers MC, De Ruysscher DK, Lambin P, et al. Phased attenuation correction in respiration correlated computed tomography/positron emitted tomography. Med Phys 2006;33:1840–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Meirelles GS, Erdi YE, Nehmeh SA, Squire OD, Larson SM, Humm JL, et al. Deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT: clinical findings with a new technique for detection and characterization of thoracic lesions. J Nucl Med 2007;48:712–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Meirelles GS, Squire O, Larson SM, Humm JL, et al. Deep-inspiration breath-hold PET/CT of the thorax. J Nucl Med 2007;48:22–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doumit Daou.

Additional information

This editorial commentary refers to the article http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0858-2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daou, D. Respiratory motion handling is mandatory to accomplish the high-resolution PET destiny. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35, 1961–1970 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0931-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0931-x

Keywords

Navigation