Skip to main content
Log in

A decision support system improves the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of a computer-based decision support system (DSS) on performance and inter-observer variability of interpretations regarding ischaemia and infarction in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS).

Methods

Seven physicians independently interpreted 97 MPS studies, first without and then with the advice of a DSS. Four physicians had long experience and three had limited experience in the interpretation of MPS. Each study was interpreted regarding myocardial ischaemia and infarction in five myocardial regions. The patients had undergone a gated MPS using a 2-day stress/gated rest 99mTc sestamibi protocol. The gold standard used was the interpretations made by one experienced nuclear medicine specialist on the basis of all available clinical and image information.

Results

The sensitivity for ischaemia of the seven readers increased from 81% without the DSS to 86% with the DSS (p = 0.01). The increase in sensitivity was higher for the three inexperienced physicians (9%) than for the four experienced physicians (2%). There was no significant change in specificity between the interpretations. The interpretations of ischaemia made with the advice of the DSS showed less inter-observer variability than those made without advice.

Conclusion

This study shows that a DSS can improve performance and reduces the inter-observer variability of interpretations in myocardial perfusion imaging. Both experienced and, especially, inexperienced physicians can improve their interpretation with the advice from such a system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005;330:765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Folks RD, Santana CA, Krawczynska EG, Braal LD, Ezquerra NF. Diagnostic performance of an expert system for the interpretation of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1185–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haddad M, Adlassnig KP, Porenta G. Feasibility analysis of a case-based reasoning system for automated detection of coronary heart disease from myocardial scintigrams. Artif Intell Med 1997;9:61–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Khorsand A, Graf S, Sochor H, Schuster E, Porenta G. Automated assessment of myocardial SPECT perfusion scintigraphy: a comparison of different approaches of case-based reasoning. Artif Intell Med 2007;40:103–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fujita H, Katafuchi T, Uehara T, Nishimura T. Application of artificial neural network to computer-aided diagnosis of coronary artery disease in myocardial SPECT bull’s-eye images. J Nucl Med 1992;33:272–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Porenta G, Dorffner G, Kundrat S, Petta P, Duit-Schedlmayer J, Sochor H. Automated interpretation of planar thallium-201-dipyridamole stress-redistribution scintigrams using artificial neural networks. J Nucl Med 1994;35:2041–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamilton D, Riley PJ, Mioloa UJ, Amro AA. A feed forward neural network for classification of bull’s-eye myocardial perfusion images. Eur J Nucl Med 1995;22:108–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindahl D, Palmer J, Ohlsson M, Peterson C, Lundin A, Edenbrandt L. Automated interpretation of myocardial SPECT perfusion images using artificial neural networks. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1870–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gjertsson P, Lomsky M, Richter J, Ohlsson M, Tout D, van Aswegen A, et al. The added value of ECG-gating for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction using myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and artificial neural networks. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2006;26:301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lomsky M, Richter J, Johansson L, Hoilund-Carlsen PF, Edenbrandt L. Validation of a new automated method for analysis of gated-SPECT images. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2006;26:139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Train KF, Areeda J, Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Maddahi J, Kiat H, et al. Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality. J Nucl Med 1993;34:1494.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Train KF, Garcia EV, Maddahi J, Areeda J, Cooke CD, Kiat H, et al. Multicenter trial validation for quantitative analysis of same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi myocardial tomograms. J Nucl Med 1994;35:609.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindahl D, Lanke J, Lundin A, Palmer J, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of myocardial bull’s-eye scintigrams with computer-based decision support system. J Nucl Med 1999;40(1):96–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a scholarship from Medicon Valley Association.

Conflicts of interests statement

Kristina Tägil and Lars Edenbrandt are shareholders in Exini Diagnostics AB, which owns the EXINI heart software used in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Tägil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tägil, K., Bondouy, M., Chaborel, J.P. et al. A decision support system improves the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35, 1602–1607 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0807-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-0807-0

Keywords

Navigation