Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumour assessment in advanced melanoma: value of FDG-PET/CT in patients with elevated serum S-100B

  • Original article
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the usefulness of PET/CT in melanoma patients with an elevated serum S-100B tumour marker level.

Methods

Out of 165 consecutive high-risk melanoma patients referred for PET/CT imaging, 47 had elevated (>0.2 μg/l) S-100B serum levels and a contemporaneous 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. PET/CT scans were evaluated for the presence of metastases. To produce a composite reference standard, we used cytological, histological, MRI and PET/CT follow-up findings as well as clinical and S-100B follow-up.

Results

Among the 47 patients with increased S-100B levels, PET/CT correctly identified metastases in 38 (30 distant metastases and eight lymph node metastases). In one patient with cervical lymph node metastases, PET/CT was negative. Eight patients had no metastases and PET/CT correctly excluded metastases in all of them. Overall sensitivity for metastases was 97% (38/39), specificity 100% (8/8) and accuracy 98% (46/47). S-100B was significantly higher in patients with distant metastases (mean 1.93 μg/l, range 0.3–14.3 μg/l) than in patients with lymph node metastases (mean 0.49 μg/l, range 0.3–1.6 μg/l, p = 0.003) or patients without metastases (mean 0.625 μg/l, range 0.3–2.6 μg/l, p = 0.007). However, 6 of 14 patients with a tumour marker level of 0.3 μg/l had no metastases.

Conclusion

In melanoma patients with elevated S-100B tumour marker levels, FDG-PET/CT accurately identifies lymph node or distant metastases and reliably excludes metastases. Because of the significant number of false positive S-100B tumour marker determinations (17%), we recommend repetition of tumour marker measurements if elevated S-100B levels occur before extensive imaging is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwimmer J, Essner R, Patel A, Jahan SA, Shepherd JE, Park K, et al. A review of the literature for whole-body FDG PET in the management of patients with melanoma. Q J Nucl Med 2000;44:153–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reinhardt MJ, Joe AY, Jaeger U, Huber A, Matthies A, Bucerius J, et al. Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:1178–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuster D, Chiang S, Johnson G, Schuchter LM, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma? J Nucl Med 2004;45:1323–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsao H, Atkins MB, Sober AJ. Management of cutaneous melanoma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:998–1012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schultz ES, Diepgen TL, Von Den Driesch P. Clinical and prognostic relevance of serum S-100 beta protein in malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:426–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henze G, Dummer R, Joller-Jemelka HI, Boni R, Burg G. Serum S100—a marker for disease monitoring in metastatic melanoma. Dermatology 1997;194:208–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hauschild A, Engel G, Brenner W, Glaser R, Monig H, Henze E, et al. Predictive value of serum S100B for monitoring patients with metastatic melanoma during chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Br J Dermatol 1999;140:1065–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson LO, von Schoultz E, Djureen E, Hansson J, Nilsson B, Ringborg U. Prognostic value of serum analyses of S-100 protein beta in malignant melanoma. Anticancer Res 1997;17:3071–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buer J, Probst M, Franzke A, Duensing S, Haindl J, Volkenandt M, et al. Elevated serum levels of S100 and survival in metastatic malignant melanoma. Br J Cancer 1997;75:1373–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Abraha HD, Fuller LC, Du Vivier AW, Higgins EM, Sherwood RA. Serum S-100 protein: a potentially useful prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol 1997;137:381–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andres R, Mayordomo JI, Zaballos P, Rodino J, Isla D, Escudero P, et al. Prognostic value of serum S-100B in malignant melanoma. Tumori 2004;90:607–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Domingo-Domenech J, Molina R, Castel T, Montagut C, Puig S, Conill C, et al. Serum protein s-100 predicts clinical outcome in patients with melanoma treated with adjuvant interferon—comparison with tyrosinase rt-PCR. Oncology 2005;68:341–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stamey TA, Yang N, Hay AR, McNeal JE, Freiha FS, Redwine E. Prostate-specific antigen as a serum marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. N Engl J Med 1987;317:909–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Libutti SK, Alexander HR Jr, Choyke P, Bartlett DL, Bacharach SL, Whatley M, et al. A prospective study of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose/positron emission tomography scan, 99mTc-labeled arcitumomab (CEA-scan), and blind second-look laparotomy for detecting colon cancer recurrence in patients with increasing carcinoembryonic antigen levels. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:779–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. de Jong IJ, Pruim J, Elsinga PH, Vaalburg W, Mensink HJ. 11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003;44:32–8, discussion 38–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cimitan M, Bortolus R, Morassut S, Canzonieri V, Garbeglio A, Baresic T, et al. [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1387–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dummer R, Panizzon R, Bloch PH, Burg G. Updated Swiss guidelines for the treatment and follow-up of cutaneous melanoma. Dermatology 2005;210:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med 2006;47:885–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner JD, Schauwecker D, Davidson D, Coleman JJ 3rd, Saxman S, Hutchins G, et al. Prospective study of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography imaging of lymph node basins in melanoma patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:1508–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, Elashoff R, Essner R, Glass EC, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early-stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT-I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2005;242:302–11, discussion 303–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Acland KM, Healy C, Calonje E, O'Doherty M, Nunan T, Page C, et al. Comparison of positron emission tomography scanning and sentinel node biopsy in the detection of micrometastases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2674–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wagner JD, Schauwecker DS, Davidson D, Wenck S, Jung SH, Hutchins G. FDG-PET sensitivity for melanoma lymph node metastases is dependent on tumor volume. J Surg Oncol 2001;77:237–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reinhardt MJ, Kensy J, Frohmann JP, Willkomm P, Reinhold U, Grunwald F, et al. Value of tumour marker S-100B in melanoma patients: a comparison to 18F-FDG PET and clinical data. Nuklearmedizin 2002;41:143–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pleines UE, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Rancan M, Joller H, Trentz O, Kossmann T. S-100 beta reflects the extent of injury and outcome, whereas neuronal specific enolase is a better indicator of neuroinflammation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2001;18:491–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Spinella PC, Dominguez T, Drott HR, Huh J, McCormick L, Rajendra A, et al. S-100beta protein-serum levels in healthy children and its association with outcome in pediatric traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2003;31:939–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Molina R, Navarro J, Filella X, Castel T, Ballesta AM. S-100 protein serum levels in patients with benign and malignant diseases: false-positive results related to liver and renal function. Tumour Biol 2002;23:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Banfalvi T, Gergye M, Beczassy E, Gilde K, Otto S. Role of S100B protein in neoplasms and other diseases. Magy Onkol 2004;48:71–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rohren EM, Provenzale JM, Barboriak DP, Coleman RE. Screening for cerebral metastases with FDG PET in patients undergoing whole-body staging of non-central nervous system malignancy. Radiology 2003;226:181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sze G, Shin J, Krol G, Johnson C, Liu D, Deck MD. Intraparenchymal brain metastases: MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 1988;168:187–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, Sherry RM, et al. Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science 2006;314:126–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lens MB, Dawes M. Global perspectives of contemporary epidemiological trends of cutaneous malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2004;150:179–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Eigentler TK, Caroli UM, Radny P, Garbe C. Palliative therapy of disseminated malignant melanoma: a systematic review of 41 randomised clinical trials. Lancet Oncol 2003;4:748–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Martenson ED, Hansson LO, Nilsson B, von Schoultz E, Mansson Brahme E, Ringborg U, et al. Serum S-100b protein as a prognostic marker in malignant cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:824–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jury CS, McAllister EJ, MacKie RM. Rising levels of serum S100 protein precede other evidence of disease progression in patients with malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:269–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Smit LH, Korse CM, Bonfrer JM. Comparison of four different assays for determination of serum S-100B. Int J Biol Markers 2005;20:34–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rinne D, Baum RP, Hor G, Kaufmann R. Primary staging and follow-up of high risk melanoma patients with whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: results of a prospective study of 100 patients. Cancer 1998;82:1664–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Strobel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strobel, K., Skalsky, J., Kalff, V. et al. Tumour assessment in advanced melanoma: value of FDG-PET/CT in patients with elevated serum S-100B. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34, 1366–1375 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0403-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0403-8

Keywords

Navigation